User talk:Little Monster's Chris Weeks

Welcome!

Hello, Little Monster's Chris Weeks, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 07:45, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Hello, I'm C.Fred. Your recent edit to the page Cheek to Cheek (album) appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The release date shown in the infobox is the first date of release, not the date of release in the home country of the artist. —C.Fred (talk) 07:46, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at The Cherrytree Sessions (Lady Gaga EP), you may be blocked from editing. livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 22:43, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Little Monster's Chris Weeks, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Little Monster's Chris Weeks! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! AmaryllisGardener (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:14, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Dance in the Dark. Binksternet (talk) 19:19, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gagapedia is not a reliable source. You may not cite it, though you may cite any reliable sources listed in an article there. —C.Fred (talk) 21:32, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:57, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 Hours for Repeated addition of unreferenced data. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:22, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Sexxx Dreams, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. This is the same behaviour that got you blocked before. You need to explain your edits and provide reliable sources; otherwise, you risk a longer block. —C.Fred (talk) 01:26, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Artpop with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Haminoon (talk) 01:28, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Artpop, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Artpop was changed by Little Monster's Chris Weeks (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.851588 on 2015-01-25T04:52:21+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:52, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Paparazzi (Lady Gaga song). Snuggums (talk / edits) 05:05, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 07:19, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]