User talk:Lauriepiper
Proposed deletion of Schpilkas
[edit]The article Schpilkas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Promotional article which spams links to the subject's [non-existent] website. A search for sources turns up some brief mentions, but not enough to cover WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 15:07, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
The article Casey Dunmore has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
A WP:BEFORE shows no secondary coverage. Article appears to be a CV.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Isabelle 🏳🌈 23:48, 15 August 2022 (UTC)