User talk:Laogorus
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Laogorus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Pierre Heymann, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Your first article
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 32.216.147.44 (talk) 13:34, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Pierre Heymann
[edit]The article Pierre Heymann has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Notability has never been established, nor have any acceptable sources (per WP:RELIABLE) ever been added in five years. A Google search isn't helpful: [1]
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 32.216.147.44 (talk) 13:34, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
_____
Well Thank you to care about my honesty, but Pierre Heymann was a professional journalist - as now he retired, the number of his membership - CCiJP : 41103 - is the only real reference for it. But he still works very much on the sites in reference as well as on links'site included, like : www.gouvernancemondialeworldauthority.info ... I added the name and the reference for it on his page (I guess I didn't do it the right way as I am very taken these days) ... For the other references, it is mainly his works as an artist that really count, and it is not only paintings as anyone can see ...
Laogorus, 16 April 2015 _
- You've removed templates from the article re: sources and notability several times, yet it's still unclear whether there are reliable sources to support notability. Can you provide published articles about him and his work, either as a journalist or an artist, per WP:NOTABILITY and WP:CREATIVE? Thank you. 2602:302:D89:D609:254C:4B1E:D6FF:9BBD (talk) 22:22, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Pierre Heymann for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pierre Heymann is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pierre Heymann until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JNW (talk) 22:36, 16 April 2015 (UTC) _____________
Excuse me but I do not understand why the page Pierre Heymann shall be deleted, as it is in accordance to Wikipedia standards as an information about art and artists ... May you show me precisely where you want more references. Thank you. Laogorus on 17 April 2015