This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
yeah man, i'm sorry about that. i tried to fix it after i hit save page but it didn't save again. i worded it wrong and didn't want the bold letters. i tried removing the bold letters and to reword it but once again, wasn't saving. so i apologize. i was trying to put something he said "in character" in one of his own youtube vids on the page and didn't know where to put it in the article. i think that should be mentioned in the article though whether it's in character or not because he has asked his fans to do this. so maybe in the article it could say, lately (or recently) phil theis has attempted to get back into the wrestling business and is asking for help from fans of his work in an almost picketing type of manner. or something like that. none the less, it should be in there. because what he is doing lately is important to the life and career of the man himself and has everything to do with or to be put in the article. so once again, i apologize for the way it came out on the article and i tried to fix and honestly understand how you could take that as vandalism, but it really wasn't. maybe it could have come of that way because, i put it in the wrong section, worded it a little wrong, and because of the bold letters. but i think i worded it a little better hear on your talk page and truly believe that it should be put in the article. the article hardly has anything about him on youtube and that has made the guy a bigger star than ever. what is the deal with that? if someone had no idea who phil theis or damien demento was and they looked at his wikipedia article for research the would be greatly ripped off because the article is so out of date. just like a TV shows character's page gets updated every week after every new show, or a wrestler's page gets updated after every new angle, so should damien demento's. make no sense and is extremely biased. just my personal opinion and i'm all ready aware about how PC you are and that you don't agree with it. so i'd like to once again apologize beforehand.
RE:
Its no problem at all. As I know, you've been busy. Would you like for me to help you in any projects? Thank you for your for acknowledging my progress. ZenlaxTCS19:42, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Your welcome. Also, in the sentence that says Cena faced off against Carlito on RAW, did Orton make a run-in to interfere in the match? ZenlaxTCS20:06, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Good. I was a bit confused, but I've read the report and it stated that Orton was at ringside. One thing does stand out in the article; you tend to mention one month before SummerSlam, it might not be a problem, but you do tend to mention it a lot in the report. I would fix it, but you did indeed ask for opinion on the article, and its your decision if you would like to make the change or not. But overall, the article looks great. Good work, my friend. :) ZenlaxTCS20:28, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You are welcome. It will be a thrill to see SummerSlam become a Good article; you've done a fine job with the article. I'd like to apologize for not contributing my time to you and the rest of the members with Unforgiven (2004), as I saw that all of you put in your hard work into the article. ZenlaxTCS20:46, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed true. But, I would like to add the userbox for Vengeance; whenever the article looks right for Good article. Can I have your input on Vengeance? ZenlaxTCS20:54, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please vote again, the pay-per-views that were bolded have been "rejected." Please do the same thing, and bold the pay-per-view you would not like to do, out of the remaining pay-per-views left. iMatthew200822:22, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
what blog?
even when it's the person's own?
Thank you
Thanks for the barnstar. I enjoy doing copyediting for members of the project, so I try to help out with any articles that are about to be nominated for GA. I'll do my best to make sure I go over the other two before the end of the week. Best wishes, and good luck with the nomination. I'm fairly confident that it will pass once a few minor changes are made. GaryColemanFan (talk) 22:07, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I made the change for #9, as I didn't explain it well and it was a minor thing. As for #6, it seems strange that Porter and Hardy went from being rivals to being teammates with no explanation. Did they get along as teammates, or was this just WWE pairing up people who didn't like each other once again? GaryColemanFan (talk) 00:06, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Another thing I wanted to mention is that the source you gave for the Booker-Cena match in the Aftermath section doesn't support the statement. The source only discusses what happened after the match, and it doesn't mention the interference or the disqualification. I've been looking for a source, but I'm not really sure where to find reliable sources for recent matches. GaryColemanFan (talk) 00:26, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You've done a great job with the fixes for SummerSlam. Perhaps for #6, an explanation could be worked into the text ("Despite their rivalry, WWE paired up Hardy and MVP, who defeated Deuce 'N Domino to retain the WWE Tag Team Championship the following month at Unforgiven."). GaryColemanFan (talk) 01:47, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What about adding a paragraph to summarize the Aftermath? That way, the lead would truly summarize the entire article. It could be something like:
Several of the existing feuds carried on after the event. Notably, CM Punk continued to face John Morrison, defeating him for the ECW Championship the following month. The day after SummerSlam, Orton interfered in a match between Cena and King Booker and intensified the feud by attacking Cena's father. Khali and Batista faced each other at Unforgiven, the following pay-per-view, as part of a triple threat match; Batista was victorious in this match and won the World Heavyweight Championship.
Not a problem. Like I said, I am more than willing to help when I have time. I sometimes worry that people take what I say the wrong way, so I hope that my suggestions have come across as constructive feedback rather than criticism. GaryColemanFan (talk) 02:18, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, that's definitely the most frustrating part of the system. I just had an article that I wrote make it into the list of the "Five oldest unreviewed nominations" today. I did my first GA review today, and I'm trying to encourage other editors to do the same so that we can cut down on the backlog in the "Sports and recreation" list. And you never know...the first article I nominated for GA was reviewed within a couple of hours. GaryColemanFan (talk) 03:13, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I believe that you originally mentioned your intention to nominate the article last Saturday, so tomorrow should be fine. I'll also admit to a little impatience on my part, as I gave my notice to nominate WrestleMania X last Friday, but I want you guys to nominate SummerSlam, Unforgiven and No Way Out first, as I've already got SummerSlam (1994), Jos LeDuc and Ion Croitoru nominated. (That's impatience at waiting for your one week to end, not impatience at any of you, but it's good to stick to the policy, as it's been working well so far.) Let's hope the review process can speed up a bit, though. As I mentioned, it would be great if anyone from The Kliq could find time to review a "Sports and recreation" article, as it would speed things up for us. I just finished reviewing an article, and I found the process to be very educational. Anyhow, best wishes for SummerSlam. GaryColemanFan (talk) 04:32, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I can look SummerSlam 2004 over, but it might take a couple of days before I'm able to get to it. Have you given notice on the WP:PW talk page for it? I've already promised Zenlax that I would look over Vengeance 2005 next, and Truco asked me to copyedit No Way Out 2004. I've also got an article that I'm in the middle of writing, and I haven't gotten to it in a couple of days now. Between Pre-GA reviews and completing a GA review, I'm a little burnt out and I might need to take a day off before committing to doing much more right away. Like I said, I'm happy to help and I think it's great that project members are getting articles ready to nominate. I will get to it soon, though. GaryColemanFan (talk) 05:45, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
To avoid another round of voting, please go back to The Kliq's talk page and bold a second PPV you would not like to do. After this we will have three nominations remaining. Thanks! iMatthew200811:56, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, very badly. But it's ok. I want to work on something everyone agrees on. My top choice of the ones left is SummerSlam 2005. iMatthew200821:52, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, sorry about that. I didn't see it. Hey, is the Chavo and Rey thing really notable? Cause, I just had a test and the kilobytes went from 47 to 44. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE)01:40, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I tried the test for a reason. Did Gary say to expand the lead more? Hey, now I'm telling you what Truco told me. You go too much into detail in the matches. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE)01:48, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have no idea how to nominated things for AfD, so i thought I'd ask you. Mr. All-Powerful Admin! ;) OVW Television Champion is the exact same as OVW Television Championship, and from what I can tell, the "OVW Television Champion" one was copied and pasted from the Championship article. Without the editor even going into the edit window. *Sigh* Anyway, thought I'd let ya know, so you could flex those admin muscles. I think you could probably "speedy delete" this, but I'll leave it up to you. Peace, and happy editing! ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 04:01, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Everything looks great. Though, the Cena and Orton aftermath seems quite odd; you write that Orton interfered in a match involving Cena and Booker T, in which Cena won. Where exactly was Cena's father? Was he in the ring with Cena? It might become a confusion statement to the reader. But overall, it looks fantastic. ZenlaxTCS21:01, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I think SummerSlam will be a great addition to the Good article category. It would, however, be better if it became Feature article. ZenlaxTCS21:25, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please do. I wouldn't want you to listen to my message and have SummerSlam fail Feature article, because of my reasoning. Do notify me if you either go with Good article or Feature article so I can help you in anyway. ZenlaxTCS18:04, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. I was reading some reports and it doesn't seem that Edge and Kane had a big feud. So, just stay with the first two feuds. Unless, you want to add it. ZenlaxTCS20:08, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I trust your judgment. Is there anything that you would like for me to do? Only reason I ask, I have nothing to work on. ZenlaxTCS20:13, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Can you undelete Jeroen van Veen (pianist) please?
I've been editing wikipedia since 2005, but haven't encountered the following oddity yet. I split up a page describing two equally notable and googlable people with the same name (Jeroen van Veen). These unrelated people existed together on that same page for a year, having nothing in common but the same name. After my split, and my edit summary said where the text came from, a user (who by now has apologized for it) tagged one page for speedy deletion within a minute. I don't know the pianist, but he is prize winning and made dozens of recordings, and is also a composer, producer, artistic director, etc., while the copied text contained 5 links to websites describing his activities. I mentioned this on the talk page and removed the tag, as the speedy deletion tag seemed without merit and one could consider it even vandalism. Nevertheless, within a few more minutes you went ahead and deleted the page based on the unspecified tag alone. How come? Feels like guilty-unless-proven-innocent followed by-shoot-before-you-ask to me. A very counterproductive procedure. Could you revert the delete please? Afasmit (talk) 00:17, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Is it good for it to be in the lead? I mean you repeat alot of the aftermath in the lead and then in the aftermath section, but if its good for the article then leave it. --TrUCo-X22:17, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I recommend you first make sure it passes GA, because Lex, tried to nominate New Year's Revolution (2007) for FA before nominating if for GA, and it failed. Also I think if I nominated NWO 04 straight to FA, It would have failed, look at the nom page now, one objection and then no more responses. Take it to GA, then FA.TrUCo-X22:44, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I dont know if am correct, but on WWE.com, per here, it says "Monday Night Raw’s special three-hour episode celebrating its 15th anniversary drew an incredible 4.4 rating last Monday night on USA Network", it was a 4.4, and in the older version (Before I changed it), it says 4.1, and according to WWE its 4.4, and isnt WWE.com really the most reliable source there can be? NimiTize02:20, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree with the idea that Tomko turning back heel and rejoining the Angle Alliance is all of a sudden non-notable in his article. If this turn and his entire time in the Alliance from that point on is brushed out of his article, someone could read up on it a year or so from now and think Tomko's character stayed independent when in fact he cemented a position in what "was at the time" (as the language will be) the most powerful heel stable in TNA. The articles on Christian's Coalition, the Angle Alliance, and the tag team of A.J. Styles and Tomko certainly haven't seen that information reverted ten thousand times on the personally-I-think-its-application-here-is-ridiculous basis of "non-notability". So how can that be the case on the article for Travis Tomko himself? 172.168.107.202 (talk) 00:30, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
For your excellent contributions to Wiki and for stopping vandalism from over exceeding, I award you The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar. SexySeaShark17:28, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Originial research
The exact some content in a neater matter is original research? Well, ok...if you want an article to look like a 6-year-old typed it, no hair off my ass. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tvp119 (talk • contribs) 20:46, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A few Announcements
Cross posted to all Kliq members
As you may or may not have noticed on The Kliq's talk page, I have added two temporary sections. In "Last Minute Nominations," you are free to add any pay-per-view nominations that you have recently thought of or forgot about earlier. If you have any, please add them. If you do not, please just write none, in that section, so we know that you've seen it at least. Also, in "Bring 'Em Backs," you can choose one pay-per-view that has been voted out, and bring it back into the running. All you have to do it choose the pay-per-view and add it to the "Bring 'Em Backs" section. If you would not like to bring back any pay-per-view, please again, write none, so we know you've seen it. Cheers! iMatthew200821:58, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
So I should go ahead and create it? Can you do some copy-editing for NWO 2004, as requested in its FA nomination, I am not to good with that, that's if you are able to do so.TrUCo-X22:50, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Cool. Cause, right now I don't think I can nominate it, cause of school and stuff. But, by next month, I'll have free time. Man, was high school hard for you? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE)01:38, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe he might listen to you since you are an admin, but there is an issue at Image:WrestleManiaXXIVposter.JPG. The uploader keeps removing the tag I placed. The problem is he is trying to say he can release the image under the GNU license (basically releasing it into the public domain) even though the image is copyrighted by WWE but he keeps removing the disputed license tag I placed. TJSpyke23:36, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Wow is this IP wrong, anyway, the hardcore title list is done. You think we should nominate it for FL, or first see what the WP:PW community says?--TrUCo-X00:33, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I have alerted the WP:PW community, should I wait for responses, or should I go ahead and nominate it now?--TrUCo-X01:00, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If there are some things to be done with during its nomination and if you fix them and it passes then you can display, if not, we can always work on another list.--TrUCo-X01:06, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I will not be available much today. I have to go now, because I hae a rehearsal for the next four hours. Then I'll be home for about 4 or 5 hours, then I'm going out for the night. So, I'll be on as much as I can in those 4-5 hours I'm home. iMatthew200813:40, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, just making sure you know that this isn't going to be The Kliq's last project. It's D.M.N. and bulletproof's last project with us. iMatthew200818:23, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"Last Minute Nominations" and "Bring 'Em Backs" have closed. Please go back to the Kliq page and vote for the next round. P.S. I heard Batista was removed from the roster page, and was released. iMatthew200818:45, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I recommended that we have fifteen questions, and the following fifteen users answer one questions each: Me, You, Truco, Blue, Nici, Zenlax, Hybrid, Chronic, Nikki, Alex, D.M.N, Gavyn Sykes, Naha, GCF, and TJ Spyke, Now that I think about it, it is way too much for one interview. lol. iMatthew200812:35, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You cannot just copy and paste what I gave you back onto the article space. I told you to signify his importance, and you still haven't done that. I will give you 7 days to either improve the article, or signify why he is important. If you cannot expand the article any further or fail to signify his importance, I will once again delete it per CSD A7. Sorry for saying "signify his importance" so many times. --Cheers, LAX11:45, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please read before you write. I did not just copy and paste, but added two third-party external links. The text should've been sufficient because it showed that he is notable according to the current notability guidelines, having released two or more albums on a major label (point 5) and having won in a major music competition (point 9). Still, I've added some text on his international concerts and recitals and recording activity. He is also likely "the most prominent representative of minimal music" in his city (Utrecht) (point 7) and possibly in his country. I should not be forced to write and defend a bio when simply splitting up an article describing two people. Afasmit (talk) 00:36, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for me being inactive for a long time am not slacking off or anything, my bro was in a car injury and I was inactive for a while, sitting at the doctors worry for my brother. I will be active around 3-6 pm Monday-Thursday and Friday I'll be active all day and more. Sorry for this. NimiTize23:37, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not to sound like a dick, but are you ever going to complete the AM for RAW for WrestleMania XIX? Or do you want me to do it?--TrUCo-X18:35, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Plus, he just created his account like a week or so ago, and all of a sudden, he knows how to create a signature, and a few of the Wikipedia policies. Hmm.. iMatthew200820:25, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the GA pass. If there's anything that comes to mind later on about the article, just drop a note on my talk page, and I'll be happy to address it. Thanks. JKBrooks85 (talk) 23:18, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What do you mean it's not a reliable source? It holds the actual proof. Much more than some article someone found on the internet which lacks any such proof. If you actually took the time to look at the clip (which you did not as you re-edited this page far too quickly), you'd see that proof. The Dixie Chicks are NOT the ones who performed that night. And if you want this Wikipedia article to be accurate, you'd make the proper changes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.169.141.235 (talk) 19:08, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Another source
Okay, since YouTube doesn't work for you, I have other sources which say the same thing.
In this case, I did notice you were finished with Backlash. Right now, I am currently adding sources to the statements. ZenlaxTCS19:36, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Its no problem at all. I was, however, going to add them, but you caught me with your message. Now, before I remove the template, is there anything else to add to the article? ZenlaxTCS19:41, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Its alright. If the decision was for a reason, then I respect that reason. Quite honestly, I wasn't around at the time the decision was made and I would like to apologize for not being part of the discussion. ZenlaxTCS20:11, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Its alright and no you are not sounding like a dick. I think you can manage. I'll look for something else to work on. ZenlaxTCS19:18, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No, the Jericho and Benjamin was not a main feud. The tag team between Michaels and Hogan versus Hussan and Davairi was one of the feuds on the Backlash card. ZenlaxTCS19:08, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know exactly. But remember, that their tag team led to Michaels turning on Hogan. But, it'd still be notable to add. ZenlaxTCS19:14, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, all I know is that Michaels asked Hogan to be his tag team partner, in which Hogan accepted. Which led to a tag team match at Backlash. Sorry, I was not watching the feuds leading up to Backlash. ZenlaxTCS19:23, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I'm new to the whole Wikipedia editing and Talking thing (so I don't know if there's a way to reply, if there is), I just try and make edits to fix errors in articles if I can.
And all three of those articles mention Farmer's Daughter as playing before the main event. Did you really check them? I'll quote them in respective order:
1. "Before the main event, Farmer's Daughter performed "O Canada". "
2. "Notes: Owen pinned Austin. Farmer's Daughter sang "Oh Canada." The Premier of Alberta Ralph Klein was in attendance, along with the entire Hart family. An incredible match. The wrestling was great, but the crowd's reaction was unbelievable, and it added so much to the experience. Austin got into it with the Hart family, and in the confusion, Owen got the rollup pin."
3. "Some band named Farmer's Daughter (I have no idea who they are either) sings the Canadian national anthem."
Also, the reference that's currently in the Wikipedia article has an author who says he never even heard The Fink make the announcement as to who performed O Canada, as "the audio on his tape wasn't great." And that he only "found out" that is was the Dixie Chicks later on (which is wrong). So where did he get HIS source from? If you ask me, that reference is far more unreliable.
Ron Killings is still being reported as having signed a WWE contract. As there is no reliable source for anything of the sort, be prepared for his name to be continually added to the WWE Roster article, and information about his return being added to his article. There is also, apparently, an audio interview with Killings where he states he will be returning to WWE with his old K-Kwik gimmick. Recent SmackDown! taping spoilers indicate that Killings has already debuted under the name Kwik Killings in a Dark match. However, no reliable source for this information has been found yet.
The article collaboration for March 3 through March 16 is Ric Flair. Please help to improve it to match the quality of an ideal Wikipedia professional wrestling related article. The next article for collaboration will be chosen on Sunday, March 16.
NOTICE: If you are actively editing and contributing to articles under the scope of WikiProject Professional Wrestling, we suggest you add your name to the list of active members.
Since the last newsletter, the number of stub articles has dropped by 45 while the total number of wrestling articles continues to grow. A list has been placed on the stub article subpage of stub articles of well-known wrestlers that should be fairly easy to improve. Please check it out and see what you can help with (even if you can only add a few details or a couple of references).
Professional wrestling articles by quality and importance
Yes sir. ;) Um, does that sentence make sense with That same night, Cena went onto unveil a spinner belt version of the WWE title? Oh, do I have to add that JBL was going to destroy it, but he didn't. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE)02:06, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
True, but your "I'm sorry, but I don't really care" was pretty funny. ;) As I saw it on the recent changes thing. Hey, if you have time, can you look over the Cena and JBL feud? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE)01:27, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I am wanting to know why you need seperate infoboxes for different promotions pay-per-views? Just use one for all so you don't have to create different ones. Mr. C.C. (talk) 06:21, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I see that the infobox was deleted. I see pay-per-view articles are using the wrestling events infobox. If you want, you can just put the items from the pay-per-view infobox into the wrestling events infobox? Mr. C.C. (talk) 18:26, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
My brother was in a car accident and I'm currently at the doctors. To all Kliq members I PROMISE that I will be back right after Wrestlemania (if I go). Sorry for the inconvenience, but life is life, right? Sorry :( be back soonNimiTize19:25, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What is your reason for revert?
It is easy for any edit to be reverted saying it is "unconstructive." I think your edit to the German people article was very unconstructive. 71.237.70.49 (talk)
Changes to the "Dollar" page.
Why do you have an automatic reversion set up for this page? There is no way you could have read the edits and made an informed reversion to my edits.
I disagree with what you left on my talk page. I was not vandalising, I was merely helping the wiki. I will take you to ArbCom if you continue to harass me. WikiMafia1 (talk) 10:19, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I am starting a project on the Cleveland Force article, and was wondering the best way to do it. Would I copy the article to a temporary storage area and then unveil it, or work on it "on the fly" as it were?
You can post your reply to my talk page THX!Hx823 (talk) 22:40, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hannah Montana 2: Meet Miley Cyrus
I replaced the promotional wallpaper for "Hannah Montana 2: Meet Miley Cyrus" and put it an accurate actual CD cover. What's wrong with that? I really don't get it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Calliegal (talk • contribs) 23:08, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry, I thought you were capitalizing the image name for no apparent reason. If you feel I was wrong, be bold and revert. –Cheers, LAX23:11, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi again. I try to edit a semi-protected page, and it says "This page is currently semi-protected, and can be edited only by established registered users" but I am a registered member. How can I edit it? Thanks calliegal_x (talk) 23:09, 13 March 2008 (UTC)Calliegal[reply]
Rashomon and Seventeen Other Stories -the Chronology Chapter. Trans. Jay Rubin. Penguin Classics (2004). ISBN0143039846 Parameter error in {{ISBN}}: checksum
What makes you put note on my page claiming un-constructivity???
Ok thanx. Hey can you help me fix some of the problems outlined in NWO'sFAC, there a couple, and if you do, you will absolutely be credited if it passes that is. Help?TrUCo-X21:19, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have created a new layout for The Kliq's pages. I took the "Projects," "Member Interviews," and "Awards" sections and created their own individual sub-pages. The links are located in the navigation bar. The layout has been added to all of the Kliq's sub-pages, as well as the mainpage. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to bring them up at The Kliq's talk page. iMatthew200801:34, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That's fine. I wanted to inform you that next week I won't be able to work on Backlash, as I am going out of state. I hope you can understand. ZenlaxTCS13:52, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry. What I'm trying to say is that I may not be able to contribute my time to the group project. The other part is that I don't want you, Blue, Truco, iMatthew, Nici and bulletproof to think that I just joined the group for the heck of it. Do you understand what I'm saying? ZenlaxTCS20:04, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, that's only for the collaboration of the project that will be started next week. Any other projects that are brought to mind, I'm sure I can help. Just, not this one. I hope you know what I meant. ZenlaxTCS20:16, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
SummerSlam
I didn't take too many pictures from the show, but I uploaded the best ones I took from the show. They're a little blurry, but I hope they can help you out with the page anyway.
All of you thank you very much for nice responses to my brothers injury, its really serious, but I have returned to Brooklyn, NY my hometown, and I guess I wont see the grand stage of them all (:(((((((((( )' But since I reuturned, I will be making my countinues (?) edits to PPV's and what not, once again thank you for your nice responses ;)
IDK if its needed or not, but adding a second ref to all refs in the BG section (there is only 1 per sentence).--TrUCo-X00:34, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Haha, Blue asked me the same thing. I created an account, but that website needs SERIOUS expansion..lol. Why don't they just copy and paste from here...lolz--TrUCo-X02:26, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I'm not really trying to make a point, but when users come to my talk page, thats the first thing they'll see. But I'll ask Blue or Matt on there option, because I dont like to be very insulting. NimiTize14:40, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
