User talk:Ktrap1997

December 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Jessie Andrews have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Jessie Andrews was changed by Ktrap1997 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.864322 on 2021-12-30T22:52:21+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:52, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive about ownership of articles, which you showed at Jessie Andrews. The next time you continue to disruptively edit Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Based on three attempts to remove content as her representative despite the conflict of interests warnings below.[1] Morbidthoughts (talk) 00:19, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Ktrap1997. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Jessie Andrews, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 23:10, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"We"

Are multiple people using this account, are you representing an organization without proper disclosure, or is "we" referring to multiple editors (whom?) in Special:Diff/1062858246? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:40, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Special:Diff/1062867655 contains "we" and "us" again; this is strange, please clarify.) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:42, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is no "we" or "us". The initial changes made to Jessie Andrew's account are factual and cited. Her career has shifted and evolved and it has been updated accordingly and the ClueBot reverted it back which shows a "False Positive." Please advise how to override the Clue Bot's False Positive and leave the most recent edits to the page permanently online.

Thank you!

Ah, no worries. Hi Ktrap1997, and welcome to Wikipedia.

While your original edit has been reverted by a bot and you are welcome to ignore that revert, the latest objection came from a human editor, RA0808. The best next step is to start a new section on the article's talk page (Talk:Jessie Andrews) arguing in favor of your changes. Once you have done so, feel free to invite RA0808 to the discussion. Of course, you can also ask them directly, as you have done – but this tends to become chaotic when multiple opinions are needed from multiple users. The ideal way is to keep the content-related discussion on the article's talk page, and to use the user talk page for delivering an invitation only.

General ideas for resolving disputes can be found at WP:Dispute resolution, although the first step should always be creating a discussion on the article's talk page and inviting the other editor to it.

Feel free to ask if any questions about the process arise, for example at the Teahouse. The people there are very knowledgeable about Wikipedia's policies and can help with tough (and simple) questions.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:56, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ktrap1997,

Please read the message above this one on conflict-of-interest. If you are a representative of the subject of a Wikipedia article, you should not be editing that article. Make suggestions on the article talk page. You were doing mass removal of content and that is seen by Wikipedia's programs as a form of vandalism.

If you have questions about any of this, please bring them to the Teahouse where newer editors can receive advice and support from more experienced editors. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:58, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was posting at the same time as ToBeFree who has offered you some sound advice as well. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:01, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]