Talk:Say OK

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

R&B and Soul Music Low‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Restore article?

This section is for people to comment on whether they believe this version of the article can be restored, overriding the AFD result of "redirect."Kww (talk) 13:17, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I got no issues with restoring it like that. Note that better ref formatting is, er, better, but for me not a dealbreaker. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 13:29, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, in this way the article is more complete, with well-sourced informations and I think it should be restored.Voices4ever (talk) 14:20, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, it looks fine. Notability was never in question, and there is enough verifiable material to warrant an article. Once it is moved into article space Image:Vanessa Hudgens - Say OK.jpg should be restored and used in the article. Cheers, Amalthea^Talk 22:44, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, that leaves just me as the last editor that argued for redirect. I'll go on record as saying that I oppose restoring the article. Most single articles are basically an infobox, that same infobox restated in sentences, a chart box, and a sentence that basically says For the video, people sang and danced while lip-syncing the lyrics. This article isn't an exception. With the redundancy removed, 99.9% of single articles work best as being a part of the parent album.

That said, I told Kikkokalabud that if he did his part by writing an article that other editors would accept, I'd take him through the steps of restoring an article that had been removed through AFD. He did a good job of that, and, as you can see from the edit history, responded well when I ripped his first version apart. He fixed the problems without getting angry, and I think he learned a lot about how to write a well-sourced article. I'll leave a request with an admin to merge the histories and restore the article.Kww (talk) 23:21, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CD Single

Where is the reference of the CD single? Johnnyboytoy (talk) 02:46, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Music videos

What happened to the images of the music videos??? Johnnyboytoy (talk) 15:38, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]