User talk:Somerandomer

Dajjal being blind

Thanks for your attention. But I couldn't figure out which eye he will be blind in. "and will be blind in his left eye. His right eye will be present but it will be dark (black)" I reaoned from above sentences that he will have problems with both eyes. --Atamyrat 17:38, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Doctor Who Adventures Magazine

This is a NEW magazine, not a rebranding of DWM! Why have you copied the Doctor Who Magazine article and only changed the image, not the text? Do you intend to do so? You really should develop this in a Sandbox before publishing. At the moment, the article is ripe for deletion. Regards, (aeropagitica) 13:56, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Book monsters

Hi - I redirected the article to List of Doctor Who monsters and aliens, because that article also covers stuff from the books (the Chelonians, for example). --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 15:52, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Userboxes

I suggest creating userboxes in userspace. I can even help you migate them if you like (just comment in my talk). Eventually, most userboxes will be migrated to userspace to fit with the German userbox solution.

There's been a huge discussion/kafuffle about userboxes which you may or may not be aware of - userboxes that display a particular point of view or are "political or polemical in nature are bad for the project" see Wikipedia:Jimbo_on_Userboxes. Not that your userboxes display any particular point of view (except on TV shows) but most userboxes are going to get migrated to userspace sometime. — Nathan ^(talk) _{/ 21:29, 27 July 2006 (UTC)}[reply]

Torchwood character

Thanks for the effort, but it's no longer necessary - I've amended the {{Doctorwhocharacter}} template to reflect the wider Whoniverse. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 13:17, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hello,

for a 15 year old - you are wise beyond your years!

I just wanted to congratulate you on your submission - EXCELLENT!

I'm a Christian who agrees with you entirely

Don't lose the faith - I'm working on it!

cheers,

Bob

I mean who cares what name you call God, as long as it's still the same God there shouldn't be a difference. Obviously some people may oppose the trinity as not all being the same God as that of Islam and Juadism but the three religions origins are so closely linked, historically and divinely. I'm a Muslim and I wish more people of all faiths were more as open-minded about this, since this kind of thing could have stopped the Crusades, the Anti-Semiticism in Pre-WWII Europe and the present Arab/Israeli conflict; after all all these prophets wanted peace, not conflict; so if people actually took the time to see these similarities, they'd see that other half the World's population worshiped the same God, a God that wanted peace no matter if you called him God, Yahew, Jenovah or Allah —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.14.134.135 (talk) 16:43, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject Chaotic

Wikipedia:WikiProject Chaotic, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Chaotic and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Chaotic during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. John Carter (talk) 23:27, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Chaotic project class

Template:Chaotic project class has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 11:22, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject Chaotic/Assessment

Wikipedia:WikiProject Chaotic/Assessment, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Chaotic/Assessment and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Chaotic/Assessment during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 11:07, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Top-importance Chaotic articles

I have nominated Category:Top-importance Chaotic articles (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 11:35, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:High-importance Chaotic articles

I have nominated Category:High-importance Chaotic articles (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 11:36, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Mid-importance Chaotic articles

I have nominated Category:Mid-importance Chaotic articles (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 11:36, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Low-importance Chaotic articles

I have nominated Category:Low-importance Chaotic articles (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 11:36, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:FA-Class Chaotic articles

I have nominated Category:FA-Class Chaotic articles (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 11:37, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:A-Class Chaotic articles

I have nominated Category:A-Class Chaotic articles (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 11:37, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:GA-Class Chaotic articles

I have nominated Category:GA-Class Chaotic articles (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 11:37, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:B-Class Chaotic articles

I have nominated Category:B-Class Chaotic articles (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 11:37, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Start-Class Chaotic articles

I have nominated Category:Start-Class Chaotic articles (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 11:37, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Stub-Class Chaotic articles

I have nominated Category:Stub-Class Chaotic articles (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 11:37, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Template-Class Chaotic pages

I have nominated Category:Template-Class Chaotic pages (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 11:37, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Unassessed Chaotic articles

I have nominated Category:Unassessed Chaotic articles (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 11:38, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Unknown-importance Chaotic articles

I have nominated Category:Unknown-importance Chaotic articles (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 11:38, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chaotic-project-logo.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Chaotic-project-logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:51, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Me

Template:Me has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. EmanWilm (talk) 20:18, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Doctor Who book character

Template:Doctor Who book character has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. WOSlinker (talk) 22:20, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of minor characters in Chaotic

The article List of minor characters in Chaotic has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a list of characters that only appear in one or two episodes. It is not accompanied by any references or real-world information (WP:N). They're not important to the understanding of the series.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 03:24, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nymphadora Lupin listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nymphadora Lupin. Since you had some involvement with the Nymphadora Lupin redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:16, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chaotic-project-type.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Chaotic-project-type.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 17:37, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]