Jump to content

User talk:Keith D/Archive 70

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 65Archive 68Archive 69Archive 70Archive 71Archive 72Archive 75

19:29, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

please fix   all  new  refs  thanks  as  always T

Please add page 453 to reference number 34 on this page. Thanks again — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.33.125.158 (talk) 06:08, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

I have added it but seems strange for a web page. Keith D (talk) 10:19, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Ref number 29 has the publisher wrong I think - please help if able and thanks for all of your time and effort. T. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.33.125.158 (talk) 07:56, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

NHLE template

Thanks for updating articles with the correct template. One thing you might keep in mind is that because the template gives the author as Historic England, this can change the place in a bibliography where the source should appear alphabetically. I've fixed this for the articles I track that you've edited (Benty Grange, Benty Grange helmet, Benty Grange hanging bowl, Works of Herbert Maryon), but it might help to remember for articles that are less closely watched. Cheers, --Usernameunique (talk) 18:44, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the updates. I had not even considered the alpha order when I started to do this, I will have to keep an eye out in future changes. Keith D (talk) 18:47, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Sorry Keith !! - could you please check new ref - number 30 - on this North England page? Thanks again T. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.33.125.158 (talk) 05:37, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Would really appreciate assistance with this page - I have tried hard. thanks again T.

Wikipedia:WikiProject Portals update #030, 17 Mar 2019

Previous issue:

Single-page portals: 4,704
Total portals: 5,705

This issue:

Single-page portals: 4,562
Total portals: 5,578

The collection of portals has shrunk

All Portals closed at WP:MfD during 2019

Grouped Nominations total 127 Portals:

  1. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/US County Portals Deleted 64 portals
  2. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Districts of India Portals Deleted 30 Portals
  3. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portals for Portland, Oregon neighborhoods Deleted 23 Portals
  4. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Allen Park, Michigan Deleted 6 Portals
  5. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Cryptocurrency Deleted 2 Portals
  6. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:North Pole Deleted 2 Portals

Individual Nominations:

  1. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Circles Deleted
  2. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Fruits Deleted
  3. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:E (mathematical constant) Deleted
  4. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Burger King Deleted
  5. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Cotingas Deleted
  6. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Prostitution in Canada Deleted
  7. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Agoura Hills, California Deleted
  8. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Urinary system Deleted
  9. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:You Am I Deleted
  10. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Cannabis (2nd nomination) Reverted to non-Automated version
  11. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Intermodal containers Deleted
  12. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Adventure travel Deleted
  13. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Adam Ant Deleted
  14. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Benito Juárez, Mexico City Deleted
  15. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Spaghetti Deleted
  16. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Wikiatlas Deleted
  17. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Greek alphabet Deleted
  18. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn Deleted
  19. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Accounting Deleted G7
  20. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Lents, Portland, Oregon Deleted P2
  21. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Ankaran Deleted
  22. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Jiu-jitsu Deleted G8
  23. Portal:University of Nebraska Speedy Deleted P1/A10 exactly the same as Portal:University of Nebraska–Lincoln also created by the TTH

Related WikiProject:

  1. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Quantum portals Demoted

(Attribution: Copied from Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Portal MfD Results)

WikiProject Quantum portals

This was a spin-off from WikiProject Portals, for the purpose of developing zero-page portals (portals generated on-the-screen at the push of a button, with no stored pages).

It has been merged back into WikiProject Portals. In the MfD the vote was "demote". See Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Quantum portals.

Hiatus on mass creation of Portals

At WP:VPR, mass creation of Portals using semi-automated tools has been put on hold until clearer community consensus is established.

See Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Hiatus on mass creation of Portals.

The Transhumanist banned from creating new portals for 3 months

See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Proposal 1: Interim Topic-Ban on New Portals.

Until next issue...

Keep on keepin' on.    — The Transhumanist   10:18, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

19:43, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Appreciation

The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
For the great work on numerous articles and watching out for references Red Director (talk) 19:07, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Many thanks for the barnstar - nice to be appreciated from time to time. Keith D (talk) 22:13, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Advertisement?

Please could you kindly take a quick glance at Impact Wrestling United We Stand which was created today? It looks like an advertisement for an event, to me. Thanks. Storye book (talk) 21:43, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

It does appear to be for a specific event but there are similar ones for previous events of this type so looks like these have been accepted as notable. May be tag for references, notability and categories, you could add advert as well. Keith D (talk) 22:12, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Thank you. Storye book (talk) 16:52, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
I went to tag it, but since I posted my question an editor has been working on it. Previously there was just the header, which on its own did look like an advertisement. It still needs improvement but maybe they haven't finished. Storye book (talk) 17:12, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

18:04, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Tidmington

Just finished this one: Tidmington. A user (https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:Crouch,_Swale#Tidmington) has added a 2001 pop but there's no ref... says there's link rot... very probable. But I so hate no refs with anality. I seem to remember that you have sorted nomis etc. equivalents... can you help here? I can't find anything. I'll have to remove the add if there isn't one. Many thanks. Acabashi (talk) 20:29, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

There is {{NOMIS2001}} template for access to the 2001 census figures but they have not used the parishes for low population figures, as was originally published by ONS, but have gone with a similar scheme as for the 2011 census of amalgamating with an adjacent area. In this case "Burmington/Tidmington Parish" as per
UK Census (2001). "Local Area Report – Burmington/Tidmington Parish (44UE017)". Nomis. Office for National Statistics.
Unsure where they got the figure for 2001 from but should be removed as having no reference at the time of addition. Keith D (talk) 21:36, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Keith, you're a wizard. As you say... seems they lump Burmington + Tidmington together because the pops are so low. I can work this info into the article based on what you have here. Very many thanks. Acabashi (talk) 21:51, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Neighbourhood Statistics did provide the 2001 date for small parishes but it was replaced with NOMIS. Crouch, Swale (talk) 22:05, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
I think we have to go with what is available for our readers today, unless there is an archived page that can be accessed. Acabashi (talk) 22:28, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

16:29, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

Arsenal F.C.

Thank you. It was my mistake. --DrSeehas (talk) 18:00, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - April 2019

Delivered April 2019 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.

19:50, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

Still a stub?

Hello!

Thank you for editing my page on Gorgasia. I was wondering in your editor opinion if the Gorgasia page that you recently edited is still considered a stub? I am doing this for a school assignment and when deleting a paragraph deleted the stub tag portion of the page by mistake. Our goal of the assignment was to get our articles to no longer be recognized as a stub. Do you think I accomplished this or should the stub tag be reassigned?

Thank you.


Joey — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jwbuzzell (talkcontribs) 15:24, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I would certainly not class it as a stub, but at least a Start-class, could be a C-class depending on the project use of that status. Looks like someone has already added a C-class for one of the projects. Keith D (talk) 16:41, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Asking for your comment

Hi. Could you please comment on Talk:USS_Cole_(DDG-67). I have tried to make the claim that is sourced to US official in Fox news, which is that the Houthis are Iranian-backed, between quotations so that we don't make Wikipedia biased by stating the allegation as a fact in Wikipedia voice I have got reverted and the explanation is +3000 and mostly about me having a point of view although I am not actually pushing any point of view. I am simply trying to make Wikipedia more unbiased. I believe since I have seen you around that area many times that you have an opinion about this so I asked you here. It would be great if you commented there. Thanks. SharabSalam (talk) 18:09, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

ETA This is the edit that got reverted. Notice that there are already a quotation mark around "Cole" and other words but not around Iranian-backed--SharabSalam (talk) 18:24, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
I would partly agree with the revert as there should not be italics around Iranian-backed Houthi rebels. The spacing & extra full stop removal where valid edits. Cole would always be italicised as it is the name of a ship which are italicised per WP:ITALICS. Keith D (talk) 18:34, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Alright Cole was not between qoutations my bad I thought that it was quotation marks. In my edit I put Iranian backed Houthis between quotation marks like this "Iranian backed Houthi rabels" which is because it is stated in Wikipedia voice and this is an allegation and has been denied by both Houthis and Iran also by many experts. One of them said that this allegation is "nonsense" even in the article of Houthi movement or Saudi Arabian–led intervention in Yemen the consensus was that the the statement that Houthis are supported is just an allegation and that it should not be regarded as a fact thus I think that we should use quotation marks and not say Iranian-backed Houthis in Wikipedia voice but by the voice of the US official--SharabSalam (talk) 18:55, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
As it is a direct quote from the source then it should be in quote marks to indicate this. Keith D (talk) 21:31, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Hi Keith, I am the other half of the discussion on the the USS Cole talk page. It's unfortunate that SharabSalam didn't notify me of this discussion because it appears he is being somewhat disingenuous. The full quote from the US defense official in the source is;

The Navy sent the USS Cole to the Gulf of Aden following an attack earlier this week on a Saudi warship off Yemen by Iranian-backed Houthi rebels[1]

... It's not just the last four words that should be put into quotes. My explanation for the revert is detailed on the article talk page and has not been represented here. I appreciate you offering advice, but I would invite you to join the discussion there so that you aren't misrepresented as well. Thanks again. Cheers - wolf 16:43, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

References

Administrators' newsletter – April 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2019).

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Two more administrator accounts were compromised. Evidence has shown that these attacks, like previous incidents, were due to reusing a password that was used on another website that suffered a data breach. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately. All admins are strongly encouraged to enable two-factor authentication, please consider doing so. Please always practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.
  • As a reminder, according to WP:NOQUORUM, administrators looking to close or relist an AfD should evaluate a nomination that has received few or no comments as if it were a proposed deletion (PROD) prior to determining whether it should be relisted.

18:24, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Talk:John Wormald Appleyard

Please could you kindly give a third opinion on the above talkpage, in the discussion about a primary sources tag? Thank you. Storye book (talk) 08:53, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Update. Thank you for your contribution Storye book (talk) 08:05, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Plesae check new refs in both Darnton Lupton and Hugh Lupton sections - there is a gap in the latter section over the last line. Thanks again T.

23:00, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

19:08, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Hey dude, I would appreciate it if you stop reverting the incorrect statement that "University of Bologna is the oldest university in the world" because it is not and never was! That premise is false on many basis and does not stand up to academic and historical facts. The oldest existing, and continually operating educational institution in the world is the University of Karueein, founded in 859 AD in Fez, Morocco as mentioned by numerous academic books and encyclopedias. The second oldest university in the world is the Al-Azhar University in Cairo, Egypt founded in 970 way before University of Bologna. If you continue to revise the editing Wikipedia will permanently block and ban both your user name and I.P address. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Afg96 (talkcontribs) 16:14, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

I think you may want to look again as all I did was correct a cite date error and did not change any factual information in the article. Keith D (talk) 16:22, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

22:27, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Archive 65Archive 68Archive 69Archive 70Archive 71Archive 72Archive 75