User talk:Karma Calculation

Welcome

Hello, Karma Calculation, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Mr.Sarcastic (talk) 08:33, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

stop your vandalism

You have been warned by multiple editors. You cannot revert long standing content or remove sources unless you can discuss and show there are contradictory sources. Since you are not ready to even compromise, discuss and keep harassing I am reverting the page back to its stable state earlier.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at :CKP, you may be blocked from editing. MyrddinGaius (talk) 07:56, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:ONUS Karma Calculation (talk) 08:13, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You need to discuss on talk page why you disagree and then I will agree to remove and you will get positive response. If you vandalize without discussion, it is harassment. I think you have some issues with Pathare Prabhus as you keep removing their mention.MyrddinGaius (talk) 08:18, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:OWNERSHIP WP:NPA Karma Calculation (talk) 08:21, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I know all those. Do you understand the meaning of discussion. It is obvious you are a north Indian kayastha. I could not care less. I am not Hindu. Please use talk page to explain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MyrddinGaius (talk • contribs) 08:23, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:STALK (talk page stalker) WP:NPA Karma Calculation (talk) 09:02, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

please stop vandalism on wikipedia

Please discuss on talk page. Do not vandalize.MyrddinGaius (talk) 10:41, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:TPG WP:ONUS Karma Calculation (talk) 10:47, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No tell me what you dont like there? I think you should focus on Maratha and Chitragupta Kayastha or Kayastha pages as the labels above apply to them. we can look at improving them together bbut through discussion on talk page not by coming and removing content. MyrddinGaius (talk) 10:53, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:UNTRUE Karma Calculation (talk) 11:01, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

what is untrue? Kindly explainMyrddinGaius (talk) 11:03, 16 May 2020 (UTC) I have been very patient with you. Since you keep pointing to all these rules that you yourself violate, can you help editing the other pages mentioned above? Your name "Karma calculation" shows that you are here for some kind of revenge (I dont know why or for what though). Should we discuss on talk page and edit them ? MyrddinGaius (talk) 11:07, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have temporarily removed content that some senior editors had added until the senior editors review the material that you found objectionable. If you vandalize just one more time, I will be happy to add it back since it is properly sourced. This is your final warning against harassing hardworking editors. MyrddinGaius (talk) 11:10, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:NPA Karma Calculation (talk) 11:13, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No one is attacking you personally. You delete sourced content that has been there for ages and is academic and approved. It is very relevant and has been around for long. You seem to have created this account only for vandalizing that page MyrddinGaius (talk) 11:53, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:NPA WP:UNTRUE WP:CONFLICTING Karma Calculation (talk) 12:03, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Karma Calculation. Are you saying that the comment about north Indian kayastha groups was WP:UNTRUE or WP:CONFLICTING? How should I know(it is sourced and not contradicted)?And I dont know who added it. . I had removed it any mention about other kayastha groups. But there was no need to be so vindictive that you had to keep vandalizing despite me removing the comments you did not like. Did you even go through the history of the page ? Most of the editors of this page do not seem to be from the ckp caste - some are not even Indian or Hindu. I think the editors are either marathi brahmin or maratha or white (non-Indian). Just check yourself. But since something was written that you did not like, you decided to vandalize the entire community page that hardworking editors have painstakingly spent time gathering sources etc. For small communities this is so difficult. I am requesting you to please stop . This will be my final message on your talk page. Have a nice day. MyrddinGaius (talk) 12:30, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

तुला चांगले माहित आहे WP:UNTRUE WP:CONFLICTING Karma Calculation (talk) 16:03, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you need any help editing north Indian chitragupta groups let me know. Lot of it is complete nonsense and not based on WP:RS but I do not want to add anything negative so I am quiet. I am not editing on wikipedia except preventing vandalism. And speak in english so I understand - I cannot read Hindi. If you vandalize any more Mr.Srivastav, I will not tolerate and will report you and your sockpuppets to admin. i am ready to and had already removed any mention of north indian kayastha group from that page so senior editors can discuss. but you relentlessly kept vandalizing. If you do not have much knowledge about them then I will edit those pages but do not want to as I am not a negative person.MyrddinGaius (talk) 17:09, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I went through that entire page carefully. There is nothing negative about any other caste. Only in the beginning that comment about north Indian Kayastha being different origin etc and I dont think it is malicious as it is an exact quote from reference. It was added long time back not recently by some senior editors- I don know who. But seniors can decide - that is why I moved to talk section and removed it from lead section. But you continued to vandalize :-( . Anyway, on monday when the page ban is lifted, I will remove that part about north Indian kayastha . Hopefully that will stop your vandalism. If senior editors scold me then you will have to defend me. If you continue to vandalize you will be reported again to admins. If you have enmity with some caste, Wikipedia is not the way to resolve it. MyrddinGaius (talk) 20:04, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you need my support on any other page, tell me. If I agree I will support. But for Heaven's ake do not vandalize Wikipedia.MyrddinGaius (talk) 20:07, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Your recent editing history at Chandraseniya Kayastha Prabhu shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Mr.Sarcastic (talk) 11:21, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:IAR Karma Calculation (talk) 11:23, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:05, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]