User talk:JoeyofScotia

Recent edit to Gateshead

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Gateshead, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 06:49, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Jeremy Corbyn, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:52, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Grampa Simpson

Hello. Please don't game the system by reverting an entire edit when all you want to do is undo part of it. Doing so is viewed as disruptive and could get you blocked from editing. Also, according to MOS:OVERLINK, names of major geographical locations (i.e. countries) should not be linked. Thank you. Linguist 111 If you reply here, please ping me (type {{ping|Linguist111}} before your message). 13:38, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Touch up

Hi User:JoeyofScotia, can you add a bit to Maiorana page about origin of marjoram (here [1]), thanks if you can.--Theo Mandela (talk) 08:35, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited River Wharfe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brittonic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, JoeyofScotia. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wigan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Le Vigan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Lumberjack (Jackyl song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rock (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bush mad love single.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bush mad love single.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:35, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of rock music performers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mad Season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pluscarden Abbey

Your recent edit in the above article contains several plagiaristic expressions. Can you revisit and correct these please. Thanks. Bill Reid | (talk) 15:10, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Bill Reid I edited Pluscarden Abbey. Hopefully, any plagiarism has been removed. JoeyofScotia (talk) 13:44, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Aye, thanks for that. Bill Reid | (talk) 15:30, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Source for Maghull

Have reverted and added a CN while I look into the Mayweed claim. Do you happen to know anything about the Key English Place-Names from Nottingham University? Seems legit but have never used it before. Koncorde (talk) 19:05, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Koncorde: English place-names from Nottingham is legitimate, and is based on reliable sources, of which include Mawer's "Place-names of Northumberland and Durham"; I have used this as a citation multiple times.

The "mayweed" claim was mentioned in the "Brittonic Language In The Old North" (Maghull was so mentioned as it may contain a Brittonic element), but where Alan James received this from I am presently unsure.

JoeyofScotia (talk) 23:31, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers Joey. Koncorde (talk) 03:34, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Never Enough (The Cure song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cassette (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:38, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Hello, I'm FlightTime. Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Bon Scott even if you provide a/some source(s), you'll still need to start a discussion on the article talk page to allow editors who regular watch that page a chance to discuss the reliability of the source(s) you provided. One reason is, genre sources can easily be considered an opinion and not fact. Genre's are a touchy subject here on Wikipedia and without discussion/consensus, regardless of your source(s), your addition or removal will most likely be reverted. Your edit has been reverted and archived in the page history for now.

Unsourced genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive.

Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 18:46, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:Sunshine on Leith single cover.png

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

File:Sunshine on Leith single cover.png

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete or generic . Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact source (such as web page, or printed document) where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:35, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of roots rock bands and musicians, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cracker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:32, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Strathtyrum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaelic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:18, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited River Lossie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Welsh.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Heritage Party (UK) logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Heritage Party (UK) logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:29, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dunmallet

I noticed your addition to Celtic toponymy and followed up the reference, hoping to add it to the Dunmallet article: but I can't see Dunmallet anywhere in your source. Did you add the wrong reference? I note that you said you consulted it on 28 March 2021: please be sure to check your sources on the day you add the content to Wikipedia, in case the source has disappeared or changed, and record the access-date so that people can see when you used the source. Thanks. PamD 11:07, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@PamD:, Dunmallet is in the source by another name (Dunmallard). I will add the various etymological explantations for this name in due course. --JoeyofScotia (talk) 11:10, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I've clarified the original post. Still puzzled by your "access date". Did you copy the ref from another article? PamD 12:12, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@PamD: I copied the reference from an article where I had used it previously.JoeyofScotia (talk) 12:13, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, it might be better practice if you quickly check that the web link still works and then add today's date. Then if it does disappear and someone's trying to track it down they've at least got a more recent target date. And if you check the link and find it doesn't work today, you can dig around in your area of expertise and track it down to its new location, or find an archived copy. PamD 16:21, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pictish/Common Brittonic

I’ve just noticed that in the last few weeks you’ve made fundamental changes to the relationship between Pictish language and Common Brittonic and now spinning that out to other articles like Cornish. This appears to be based on one PhD thesis from a lecturer at Glasgow University. Generally, PhD theses don’t qualify as a reliable source in WP because they are not necessarily subject to the same level of peer review as a published piece. But more than that there is a significant WP:UNDUE problem with what you have done. We don’t base articles on the opinion of one source unless that source has been generally accepted as the mainstream view. The crux of our WP:NPOV policy is “Neutrality requires that each article or other page in the mainspace fairly represent all significant viewpoints that have been published by reliable sources, in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint in the published, reliable sources.” What evidence do you have that this PhD thesis is now the dominant view on whether Pictish is a different language to Common Brittonic? DeCausa (talk) 13:54, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize if my edits have the appearance of having based too much on one source.

There is little consensus around Pictish, because it is only attested as a few hundred linguistic fragments. The thesis by G Rhys has been cited in the numerous subsequent works on Pictish language, toponomy, etc (including this 2020 example by Prof Katherine Forsyth, https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/222539/1/222539.pdf, who has herself produced significant material surrounding the nature of Pictish), and the implication of this is that the work enjoys a level of acceptance among researchers. --JoeyofScotia (talk) 19:48, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think that’s the point: “there is little consensus around Pictish”. That’s exactly what our articles should reflect. But the edits you have made project the only view as being the one put forward in this PhD thesis. There’s no harm in putting it forward as one of the hypotheses but (and I have to say that a PhD thesis is not a strong source in WP terms) to categorically state it as the accepted position is factually incorrect and infringes the neutrality requirement of WP:NPOV. DeCausa (talk) 19:57, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of Shetland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brittonic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Billie Joe Armstrong, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. AppalachianCentrist (talk) 02:50, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Celtic language decline in England, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lanchester.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Mesa

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Mesa, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:43, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Glen

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Glen, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:02, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of canyons, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alva.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:07, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Oasis (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Damned.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Art of Survival (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Desert rock.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]