User talk:Jeeya0211

Welcome!

Hello, Jeeya0211, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Della Beauty Products, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content protocols, and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 13:04, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Della Beauty Products

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Della Beauty Products, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 13:04, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Della Beauty Products (June 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rich Smith was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Della Beauty Products and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Della Beauty Products, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Rich^T|C|E-Mail 13:05, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jeeya0211! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 13:05, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
Hello, Jeeya0211. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.Deb (talk) 15:11, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Della Beauty Products

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Della Beauty Products, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:21, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Della Beauty Products (June 25)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Amkgp was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Wikipedia is not a place for WP:PROMOTION

~ Amkgp 💬 17:18, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Deb (talk) 18:53, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS 31553

https://utrs-beta.wmflabs.org/appeal/31553 is closed.

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. I am declining your unblock request because it does not fully address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. Please describe in greater detail how your editing was unconstructive and how you would edit constructively if unblocked. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. (https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks) As you still have access to your talk page, and as there is no private information associated with your appeal, please post your unblock request to your user talk page for administrator review. Place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your reason here "
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Thank you for your attention to these matters.

--Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:37, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PS-- "I found to be exceptional" is promotional language". --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:37, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Draft:Della Beauty Products has been deleted
Hello, Jeeya0211. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. I'm sorry, but Draft:Della Beauty Products has been deleted as meeting WP:CSD#G11. "This applies to pages that are exclusively promotional and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION." These must be rewritten from scratch from "reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject." See WP:RS.

Wikipedia:Identifying blatant advertising#Typical signs of blatant advertising contains information about content to avoid. For more information on content that may be perceived as promotional, click User:Deepfriedokra/promo. These are just rough guides. Pages can avoid all those pitfalls and still be glaringly obvious ad copy. Sometimes pages meeting WP:CSD#G11 give the appearance of an editor violating Wikipedia:Conflict of interest or WP:PAID. Please read and heed them if they apply to you. Please read Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations.

There is a very common mistake of assuming that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to promotion for commercial gain, but that is not so. Sometimes creators of promotional content are bewildered that it is considered such. If one has been trained to write or spent some time writing corporate documents or mission/vision statements or anything similar, they may simply be blind to the promotionality. It can be hard to unlearn.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and providing verifiable information. That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see Wikipedia:Citing sources . Template:cite has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template {{references}} at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there.

The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:38, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request you to please unblock my account

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jeeya0211 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi I have read the guidelines in-depth and will rephrase my write-up to make it more neutral in outlook. I intend to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia. Specifically, I intend to focus on the manner in which our environment is being harmed by the harmful chemicals found in beauty products. When we clean our face to clear out these chemicals, the water goes into the sea thereby affecting the marine animals there. Switching over to a natural or organic version of beauty products will definitely undo this harm. I understand what I am blocked for and will make productive contributions instead. I will be re-writing from scratch from reliable, third-party sources unconnected to the subject. Request you to please unblock my account. Thank you. Jeeya0211 (talk) 16:19, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No thanks, Wikipedia isn't for this sort of thing. Please find another outlet. Yamla (talk) 16:25, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request

I request you to please unblock my account so that I can contribute once again with meaningful content. I have read the guidelines of Wikipedia carefully and now I will make sure that my content does not sound promotional or is promotional in any way whatsoever.I intend to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia.

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jeeya0211 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have come here to write and contribute. Yes, I tried opening another account but my only reason was to contribute. My previous write-up did sound promotional I agree, but I was new to Wikipedia. Now I have gone through all the details of writing for Wikipedia, won't I get ever get another chance in my life? Please unblock my account, please. I have worked hard at writing a piece and once I publish it, you can see if it still sounds promotional and then block me for life. I am not committing any crime, I just want to contribute. I too won't ever think about contributing. But please I deserve another chance.

Decline reason:

We don't want to "block you for life". We want you to address the concerns given as the reason for the block. The block is not "for life", it is until the issue is resolved. You have not committed a "crime" since Wikipedia is not a government or state. You have violated policies on promotion and advocacy. I hope you find the proper outlet to do what it is that you want to do- but Wikipedia is not that outlet. In addition, you evaded your block by creating another account, which shows you are willing to disregard Wikipedia guidelines when they become inconvenient for you. You don't address this here. You won't be unblocked to contribute about beauty products or the beauty industry, and you won't be permitted to edit in such areas once unblocked before spending six months to a year developing a good edit history that shows you understand Wikipedia guidelines, by editing in topic areas competely unrelated to your conflict of interest. If there are other topic areas you want to edit in, please tell what those might be. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 12:16, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The specific account this user set up to evade their block was RitaPassion. --Yamla (talk) 10:59, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't abusively use another account. I just wanted to contribute which I was being barred from like as though I am a criminal out to find my next prey. I have been going through the Wikipedia guidelines since the past few months and practising my writing so that I can contribute in a favourable manner. Please unblock my account so that I can contribute here as well in a similar manner in which I have been contributing to NDTV India and Hindustan Times and various other publications. I'm sure Wikipedia will benefit from the inputs that I have to offer.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeeya0211 (talk • contribs)

You only need one open request at a time; please do not make additional requests until the open one is addressed. Subsequent comments should be standard, unformatted comments like this. Please avoid creating additional sections of this page, and just edit the existing section by clicking "edit" in either the section header or at the top of this page. This is easier to do in the full desktop version (even on a phone in a browser). 331dot (talk) 12:11, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I got that. Thanks for your advice. I would be extremely grateful if you could help me out so that I can contribute informative write-ups on Wikipedia.Jeeya0211 (talk) 17:17, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have penned down a few more topics of interest on political leaders around the world who do not exist on Wikipedia yet. I wish to contribute in that area in my next article. I am unable to do so because of the block. It is completely unrelated to beauty products which I agree sounded totally promotional. I have learnt my lesson and gone through the guidelines as well. You can consider my request this time and then when my article is reviewed and if it is unaccepted, you could block me indefinitely like it is now and I won't pester you again. But just for this time let me prove my worth. Jeeya0211 (talk) 10:11, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

{unblock|reason= I have penned down a few more topics of interest on political leaders around the world who do not exist on Wikipedia yet. I wish to contribute in that area in my next article. I am unable to do so because of the block. It is completely unrelated to beauty products which I agree sounded totally promotional. I have learnt my lesson and gone through the guidelines as well. You can consider my request this time and then when my article is reviewed and if it is unaccepted, you could block me indefinitely like it is now and I won't pester you again. But just for this time let me prove my worth. Jeeya0211 (talk) 14:51, 7 November 2020 (UTC)}[reply]

Tentatively how many days do I have to wait please for my account to be reviewed for unblocking?

Unblock request

I have penned down a few more topics of interest on political leaders around the world who do not exist on Wikipedia yet. I wish to contribute in that area in my next article. I am unable to do so because of the block. It is completely unrelated to beauty products which I agree sounded totally promotional. I have learnt my lesson and gone through the guidelines as well. You can consider my request this time and then when my article is reviewed and if it is unaccepted, you could block me indefinitely like it is now and I won't pester you again. But just for this time let me prove my worth. Jeeya0211 (talk) 09:50, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider my request for unblock.

Please review the latest one. Sincere request. == Unblock request ==

I have penned down a few more topics of interest on political leaders around the world who do not exist on Wikipedia yet. I wish to contribute in that area in my next article. I am unable to do so because of the block. It is completely unrelated to beauty products which I agree sounded totally promotional. I have learnt my lesson and gone through the guidelines as well. You can consider my request this time and then when my article is reviewed and if it is unaccepted, you could block me indefinitely like it is now and I won't pester you again. But just for this time let me prove my worth.Jeeya0211 (talk) 09:53, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You now have three (!!!) open unblock requests. This is abusive and will count against you. Which single one do you wish us to review? --Yamla (talk) 10:54, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You still haven't answered the question. Which single unblock request do you wish us to review? One more chance. --Yamla (talk) 11:37, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I left only the most recent unblock request active. --Yamla (talk) 14:00, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jeeya0211 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have penned down a few more topics of interest on political leaders around the world who do not exist on Wikipedia yet. I wish to contribute in that area in my next article. I am unable to do so because of the block. It is completely unrelated to beauty products which I agree sounded totally promotional. I have learnt my lesson and gone through the guidelines as well. You can consider my request this time and then when my article is reviewed and if it is unaccepted, you could block me indefinitely like it is now and I won't pester you again. But just for this time let me prove my worth.Jeeya0211 (talk) 17:29, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I think the best way forward for you is the standard offer. Go six months without block evasion, and edit another Wikimedia project during that time. This will demonstrate your ability to follow instructions and contribute constructively. Once you've built up a reputation on that project, make a request via UTRS, as below, and ask for your talk page access to be restored on English Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:13, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As you continue to abusively open multiple simultaneous unblock requests, I have revoked your talk page access. Another admin will be along eventually to review your open requests. --Yamla (talk) 17:35, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.