Jump to content

User talk:Jeblatenedlja

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Infobox stats

[edit]

Hi, the infobox accounts for league stats only. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:56, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made a change to an article, César Azpilicueta, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:26, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

matythewhite

[edit]

I'm a really fire fan of Chelsea and you can on trabsfermarkt that Azpilicueta play right midfield also So that a source, yea ! Jeblatenedlja (talk) 22:33, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Transfermarkt is not considered a reliable source and you did not even use it in the article. Qed237 (talk) 22:38, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to César Azpilicueta. Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 22:37, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

transfermarkt

[edit]

Haha that is not reliable source Haha funny That ia the first hand of football players and transfers but ok Do what you want If you ever look Chelsea game you will see some changes that you fat office worker can't know

August 2015

[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to César Azpilicueta. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:42, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Jeblatenedlja. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:43, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

maty

[edit]

I just told you You can't even tell me a bench of Chelsea football club But ok Learn people wrong You can't block me but I will report you Jeblatenedlja (talk) 22:46, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at César Azpilicueta. Qed237 (talk) 00:05, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at César Azpilicueta. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. NeilN talk to me 08:49, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 09:02, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]