Jump to content

User talk:DrMadStudio

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Jamiespilsbury)

Blocked

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Graham87 (talk) 11:38, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Removing messages from your own talk page (as you have done recently) is all well and good, but doing so from another account's talk page is not, especially when you have no explicit connection to that account. It is the final straw in a long line of incompetence from you, whether or not you do actually own the other account. Graham87 (talk) 11:38, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear user,
It's unfortunate to see you go to extreme massacres by blocking me. Just because I was clearing out my notifications, that were starting to become clogged up with old messages. I'm really not bothered by this predicament in all honesty, and blocking me makes no difference to me whatsoever. I hardly ever make edits on Wikipeida these days anyway. That's the way the cookie crumbles, and that's the way the cake gets sliced.
Good day,
DrMadStudio DrMadStudio (talk) 11:58, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DrMadStudio (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was blocked for no vaild reason, while I was clearing out my notifications that were becoming clogged with old messages from over the years. I don't know who this user is who got me blocked. But it was completely uncalled for, and was done unprovoked. All this just because I made a simple little error on a article. Regardless what happens, it really makes no difference to me. I hardly make edits anyway like some users do. This was a case of bad judgment, from someone who doesn't even know me.DrMadStudio (talk) 19:49, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were removing messages from another user's talk page but have not addressed this. Yamla (talk) 19:58, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


I don't pretend to be an expert of Wikipeida. There are some things about it that will never make sense to me. As I said, my notifications were becoming overcrowded with old messages that no longer had any use for me. I had no intention of stepping on anyone else's toes. But if it has come to this, than so be it. Beggars can't be choosers, and all things must past. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DrMadStudio (talkcontribs)

What does that have anything to do with you removing messages from someone else's talk page? --Yamla (talk) 20:17, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If I had removed messages from someone else's talk page it was done by accident. I've never had any trouble like this before on Wikipedia, so why would I start something now? I've got nothing to gain from it. As stated before, my edits on here were few and far between anyway. And I'm not honestly not bothered getting blocked. If there's nothing else, I'll see myself out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DrMadStudio (talkcontribs)