User talk:Jackbluebury

Welcome!

Hi Jackbluebury! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:10, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Misuse of WP:RFPP

Please stop spamming RFPP until you have a better understanding of our protection inquiry. I'd suggest warning disruptive editors first, then reporting to WP:AIV if they continue making disruptive edits after be sufficiently warned. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:31, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

Hello. I noticed you are very new to Wikipedia. Please try to step away from back-office tasks until you are more experienced as an editor. In general, Its best to avoid Wikipedia:Page Pages in general. Take it from me, I got yelled at by ferret (an admin) here for it. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 15:32, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Im confused Jackbluebury (talk) 15:37, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

— TNT (talk • she/her) 15:42, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jackbluebury (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

So i signed in with the only account i had and i will not vandalise, i will use reliable sources. Jackbluebury (talk) 12:17, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed sock. This is not your only account. Stop wasting our time. Yamla (talk) 12:18, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.