User talk:JackTracker/Archives/2015/June

Content requires reliably published sources, not just some website

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 22:38, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 22:41, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Re: Can you help me?

Hey, Josu4u. I have reverted the page to you version, but I am not sure if it will be reverted again by TheRedPenOfDoom. If he does, it's better if you stop reverting it again (WP:3RR). All the best! Josephjames.me (talk) 11:36, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

June 2015

Hello Josu4u. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that you shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1), or content (CSD A3), moments after they are created, as you did at Xander verbakel. It's best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks. Adam9007 (talk) 21:25, 26 June 2015 (UTC)