User talk:Holly Cheng/Archive3

Last Man Standing AfD

Hi,

In deleting the "Last Man STanding Coop" page (in accordance with the consensus on its AfD), you left a message saying that you "wouldn't object to seeing this rewritten at the correct capitalization and properly referenced (hint, hint)." Though the article was not originally started by me, I'm interested in putting it back--but obviously without the flaws that were present before. Before I can do that, though, I was just wondering if you could give me a short explanation of what proper references would be. I'll look on Wikipedia for policies relating to this as well, of course, but I am renowned for missing important guidelines. :)

Thanks in advance, and congratulations on your new adminship, --Iten 05:05, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Hi Howcheng, now that I'm an administrator, I just wanted to thank you for your support on my RfA. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 02:34, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Joaquin Murietta

Holy Molly Howcheng, you're right! What a blooper, I got my Joaguins all mixed up. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. Tony the Marine 07:04, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your RFA support

Hi Holly Cheng/Archive3! I have been on a refreshing wikibreak for the last week, so this is a belated thank-you for supporting my adminship nomination. A big congratulations on your own recently as well. Happy new year (if that's your kind of thing)! jnothman ^talk 18:04, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for your afd support at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion in regards to the deletion of Gallery of motorized bicycle. Unfortunatelly it was deleted. --CylePat 22:24, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

thanks

Greetings Howcheng,
I wish to offer my gratitude supporting me on my recent nomination for adminship, which passed with the final tally of 65/4/3. If you would ever desire my assistance in anything, or wish to give me feedback on any actions I take, feel free to let me know. Cheers! Elle vécut heureusement _{toujours dorénavant} (Be eudaimonic) 07:53, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That was not a test

It appears you removed my addition to the Mighty Bruins article because you do not agree with its content not because it was a test. Headsinger 16:45, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

request for assistance / intervention: Chess Life

Hello: I see that you dealt with the Tom Dorsch RfD. The same user (who I know in "real life" & towards whom I cannot aspire to NPOV) is creating some issues WRT the Chess Life article. (You will not that my comments do not assume good faith.) If you have time...I realize that life is short & this matter is trivial. Billbrock 00:17, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Billbrock 04:45, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

mihintale

www.lankalibrary.com is a public website where information about sri lanka is provided, and in this particular case this text is a translation of a book which is written in sinhalese, No where in the site is it mentioned that the information supplied is copyrighted.

mihintale copy rights issue

i have mailed the webmaster of the site www.lankalibrary.com and he has replied to me giving me permission to use any information provided in the site.

thank you.

Threats to Block Chess Biographies

I am a delegate representing the Great State of New York in the United States Chess Federation. Bill Brock, on the other hand, has no position in the USCF. His only notability is that he attacks Sam Sloan all the time, hundreds of times in Newsgroup postings. The issue of the blacklist is not based upon suspicions or idle chatter, convesations or emails. It is in the minutes of official business of the United States Chess Federation. The blacklist was discussed and debated at the meeting of the USCF in Minnesota in May and in Phoenix in August. I do not appreciate Howcheng threatening to block me based upon a complaint by Bill Brock who is a complete nobody in the world of chess. It was also on the complaint of Bill Brock that User:Howcheng deleted the biography of Tom Dorsch who is one of the most notable and best known chess personalities in the world. If Mr. Howcheng continues to intervene is chess related matters he should first learn something about the game and the people involved in it. Sam Sloan 06:55, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I request User:Howcheng block, ban and bar User:Billbrock. All that User:Billbrock ever does on Wikipedia is go around deleting content by User:Sam_Sloan. He did it again this morning. User User:Billbrock used to do the same thing on rec.games.chess.politics until he lost the famous Chess Politics Grudge Match in Chicago on June 26, 2005 and Sam Sloan won $1000 cash from Bill Brock. If user User:Howcheng does not block Brock and withdraw his threat to block Sloan, I shall appeal to the higher authorities to have User:Howcheng removed from being an administrator. User:Howcheng has admitted that he knows nothing abour chess. If he knows nothing about a subject, he should not be making edits concering that subject. Sam Sloan 13:56, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you had spent five minutes researching this question you would not be making your abasimally stupid remarks. With a little research you would have found out that Bill Brock has spent years attacking me, and I have never attacked him. If you search the newsgroup rec.games.chess.politics you will find that Bill Brock has posted 580 times on that group under his persona politikalhack@gmail.com and almost all of his postings were attacks on me. That it just one of his email addresses. It got so notorious that outside third parties put up $1000 cash (one thousand dollars) to see a grudge match between me and Brock. I traveled to Chicago to play the match and I won the $1000.

Since then, because of numerous complaints about his bad behavior, Bill Brock has stopped posting to rec.games.chess.politics . Instead, he has moved over to Wikipedia. Again, almost all of his postings here have been attacks on me. He even added my name to a list of pedafiles on Wikipedia.

Now, User:Billbrock has found an ally in User:Howcheng. User:Howcheng has become the alter ego and willing agent of Billbrock. If User:Howcheng does not cease and desist from this activity, I will appeal to the higher authorities to remove the administrator status of User:Howcheng and ultimately to block User:Howcheng from Wikipedia. Sam Sloan 07:04, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Howcheng did not look very hard. All he had to do was look at [1] and he would have seen that twice on December 20, 2005 User:Billbrock added my name to a list of pedophiles. Also, User:Billbrock calls me "a felon, habitual liar, and child molester". He has called me the same things hundreds of times in the past, as User:Howcheng would have known if he had only spent five minutes researching this subject before deleting two of my biographies. Sam Sloan 16:09, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, since there was no response from User:Howcheng to your comments, I would like to make a few minor responses to your comments. Firstly, Wikipedia does not care who is a nobody in the world of chess. Secondly, threats to have a dispute arbitrated are not appreciated, and are considered Personal Attacks, which are not tolerated on Wikipedia. If you are not satisfied with the way an administrator has treated you, please feel free to request arbitration or mediation, but do not make empty threats to Administrators just to try and make them do as you tell them. It is not appreciated at all, and I would assume that Arbitrators would not remove his administrator status, nor block him from wikipedia, based on what I would consider a petty edit war, in which he is trying to mediate. Furthermore, it is not up to you to determine who is permitted to make edits regarding what subjects on Wikipedia. You are not in charge in any capacity on Wikipedia, and you should respect that. The behaviour of User:Bill Brock is another issue, however I suggest you change your tone and Assume good faith on User:Howcheng's part, and politely request that he look into User:Bill Brock's contributions. In summary, a change of attitude on your part is in order. Werdna648^T/_C\^@ 12:28, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Salford Jets

If I was mistaken in using the {{db-band}} tag on the Salford Jets page, thank you for correcting me. However, based on my understanding of the tag, that page seemed to be a pretty good example of why that tag was created. If I was wrong, your input will help me understand my mistake. Thank you. Jfiling 07:49, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I see your reasoning on the talk page for the article's deletion. Thank you anyway. Jfiling 07:52, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Salford Jets

I created the link from Piccadilly 1152 to The Salford Jets because the presenter or broadcaster Named "Mike Sweeney" was not linked to the the true Mike Sweeney of Piccadilly Radio, the name was linked to an American sports man with the same name. I felt it only right to give him a better and true link. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jon442 (talk • contribs) 15:31, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Craig James

Very nice work! I'm pleased to have been corrected. Sliggy 19:47, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

mihintale issue

why is the mihintale article still showing that it has a copyrights violation problem ???

thnks

Speedy Images

Since I spent 20 minutes going through tagging the orphan images that various Wikipedians had scanned of their genitals, which weren't linked in any way, I'm curious why you're now marking them all now as not Speedy-candidates, which they are. There is no need for an AFD, WP:WWIN makes it very clear that images not uploaded for the purposes of illustrating an article are simply not welcome on WP. Thus, speedy. Sherurcij ^{(talk) (bounties)} 22:50, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Randal McCloy

Hi, You nominated Randal McCloy as an article for deletion, but did not specify why on the talk page. I believe this page is integral to information about the 2006 Sago Mine disaster; please come back to Randal McCloy to explain your stance. Thanks, appzter 23:42, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry! :) appzter 23:46, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sumela Monestary

I feel that I ought to point out that it was not I who made a mistake with the naming of this article. I simply responded to a request to improve/merge the two articles. As for the reasoning behind not deleting misspelt articles.. perhaps you could explain why the current policy is a good one? I'm amazed. Rob cowie 17:12, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers for the clarification. I disagree with the policy.. but thats life. I see it becoming a problem if the content of wikipedia is ever moved to a more advanced wiki system, say one that provides a 'did you mean' functionality a la Google. If we are already cluttered with redirects for similar spellings, such a feature would not work as intended; it would generate a vast list of each spelling permutation present in the wiki. While I'm on the topic, is there any effort ongoing to create a future wiki system with enhanced functionaility? Is it likely that wikipedia will be moved to a different wiki system (e.g. MoinMoin etc.)? Rob cowie 18:14, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Clarified it

Hopefully. :) --Syrthiss 20:16, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Godcasting

Thanks for that. Do you mind looking over my advice at User:Mo0 to see if I am totally making things up with regards to their admin actions? - brenneman ^(t)^(c) 07:50, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Left End

Something broken automagically fixes itself? This is where I would just smile, back away, and ask no more questions. Thanks for double checking that for me. - brenneman ^(t)^(c) 01:10, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delaid update

Delaid has been updated. Please do a forced refresh and view new instructions on User talk:R3m0t/delaid.js. r3m0t ^talk 15:08, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Murrell AfD

Ok, I re-posted the article under http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Go0dspeed/Steve_Murrell.

I wonder if reliable sources mean only web sources. I admit online content is sparse at this point.

Also, can't this article be treated as a 'stub' instead of being trashed? Other people can contribute later on. Are the admins stricter on bios?

I'm starting out here in wikipedia after this site has received much publicity last year :) I would like very much to contribute to this resource.

I would like to be guided as I've read most of the guidelines so far.

Go0dspeed 17:56, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of Ukrainians

Hi, thanks for unprotecting. As soon as it was unprotected and changed back to my last version, the user changed it right back to his older version. I have made attempts to discuss it with him in the TALK page but all I get are negative comments about how I added two people of the same name to the list once (as if this is somehow showing that his outdated version isn't outdated). The names he has disputed with me in the edit war are restored in my version under the section "Foreign Nationals born on Current Ukrainian soil" yet he continues to ignore making any compromise and just reverts as much as he can (though usually once per day so he will not be blamed for 3RR - which he has reported me for many times). You can check my attempts at finding a consensus in the TALK page but I'm often ignored - especially during page locks. If you do not believe my version is more updated, you can check here: [2] to show you all the names that are being deleted without reason and all the misspellings and such that are being restored. Please help me cease this edit war once and for all, since now there's almost nothing to argue about - it's just a bunch of pointless reverts. Antidote 16:36, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

removal of Sean Sinjin

I agree with your comment on the Sean Sinjin removal topic. Would it be possible to remove the 4 entries on November 14th as they are innaccurate and unsupported, and expose someone to unwarranted risk due to the writings of Sean Sinjin?

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cindy the Dolphin

In this AFD, you mentioned your vote was conditional on verification of the legal status of the "marriage". It turns out the "bride" herself, acknowledges, it has no legal signficance [3] in an AP story picked up by MSNBC. Also, FYI, a redundant article was made at Sharon Tendler. Not knowing of the earlier one, a nominated it for deletion (if I knew of the other, I would have done a redirect). So, you may wish to visit Sharon Tendler. --Rob 09:45, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

removal of Sean Sinjin

Can we please remove all November 14th, 2005 history pages for the article 'Sean Sinjin'? They expose the author and because of the politically sensitive nature of the author's work (go to http://www.BetterHuman.org to understand why it is so sensitive), it is quite likely the author and family will be unduly exposed to very dangerous extremist religous reprisal. The information contained on those history pages are not public knowledge and was unfortunately posted by some misguided individual with the ill-intent of passively harming the author. I'm sure you wouldn't want your personal details published on the Internet, so I am asking the same privacy consideration from you, especially in light that the 'articles for deletion' vote indicated a 'majority' to delete for the reason stated above.

Given that he is an avowed atheist who's writing these books, I'm sure he's already getting threats from religious extremists. The contact information is freely available on the IST Corporate web site, and the name "Sean St. John" is listed on Amazon UK as the publisher, so there's no real private information here. The only that's close is the mention of the Palm Beach County Mensa, but considering that IST is located in Jupiter, Florida, that's easily deduced. In addition, there's nothing libelous. There are no grounds for removal of those edits from the history. Sorry. howch e ng {chat} 22:46, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well my friend, so be it. If you were meant to be the individual that reduces the value of privacy and safety to be subject to a random person's careless whim, then I cannot control that. I will endeavor to secure myself and my loved ones in other ways as this world in its current incarnation poses phenomenal risks for someone like myself who is trying to help humankind free themselves from eons of religious tyranny. In the spirit of rampant abuse of privacy, please, for the eternal record of the Internet, would you also like to share your full name on this article? Before you do, however, please remember that the nature of religion is that it drives people beyond passion, beyond reason, sometimes quite literally into insanity as witnessed by a myriad of disastrous historical events. You and your family may inadvertently get caught up into any backlash that is aimed at me, for no other reason than your name appeared alongside mine in an Internet search when some dangerous individual was looking for me. You may do well to refrain from exposing yourself to this risk by not putting your personal information immediately in this article. Agreed?

Nanowar copyright violation

There is no violation in Nanowar's article, since their material is licensed under creative commons license (see their home page at www.nanowar.it ).

I don't see anywhere on the site saying that. Do you have a link? Regardless, Creative Commons and GFDL aren't compatible. howch e ng {chat} 22:49, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whistles, looks innocent

[4]... [5]. - brenneman ^(t)^(c) 00:14, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Page protection

Hi Howcheng. I would appreciate a response to my comments at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection#Extended articles about José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero. It appears you are taking sides and I would like some clarification. Thanks, SqueakBox 01:12, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you would like to know what sort of person you defended see the contribs of SquealingPig (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and SquealingPigAttacksAgain (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). The first identity appeared to attack me within minutes of this present dispute first erupting. Is that the sort of person you want to take sides with in a dispute? SqueakBox 01:43, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

curious

can i have the item that i posted transfered to, i belive it's like a page that i can post whatever i want on it somewhere on wikipedia or is once it's deleted is it gone for good?

zack

Burger Ranch (Portugal)

This article is a mechanical copy of the article I created under the name Burger Ranch, without copying the edit history. Problems:

There is no use in having this article twice.
Renames of articles should first be discussed and done through the official paths.
As the main contributor to the original article, I would like that to be acknowledged in the history.

I will restore the tags, however I would appreciate your help in better connecting them to Wikipedia pages and fine-tuning the messages. Sorry that I am not so experienced in all this. Regards, gidonb 03:36, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Howcheng, I just saw how you or someone else solved the problem under Burger Ranch (Israel) and applied the same solution to Burger Ranch (Portugal). Should have thought of this myself. Regards, gidonb 03:40, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dan W. Gray

Hi! I saw that you deleted Dan W. Gray. I just wanted to let you know that I recreated it as an stub on the San Jose mayor. Regards, Punkmorten 19:19, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Marian (Truby) Cronk

Could you explain why you think the site is not a commerical content provider? I tried to read the article at their page, but they require you to register for 11.95. NickelShoe 23:42, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD/Franklin Parks

FYI, the reason I readded the speedy is because I believed that the research I mentioned in my vote established non-notability, and therefore justified the CSD A7 nn-bio per WP:BIO, as football is not a mainly amateur sport and he doesn't play even at the highest level of college football. Does the guideline merit further work in order to establish clearer criteria? VT hawkeye_{talk to me} 00:16, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PAGE JEFF AQUILON

CAN YOU TELL ME HOW TO UPDATE PROPERLY. I USED RELIABLE SOURCES..I DONT KNOW WHAT YOU MEAN??? CAN YOU FIX THIS FOR ME ..THANX:op

Getting Started with RPM

Please do not add commercial links — or links to your own private websites — to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. howch e ng {chat} 07:11, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 >> No..I am not using any External Links/Commercial Links. By the way where did you find the external links?
 >> Sriram 10:20, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Deletion_review#Seth Ravin

An AfD you participated in is now at deletion review. - brenneman ^(t)^(c) 23:36, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Croatian 104th Brigade

1. I'm in Croatia so US court ruling don't apply.

2. So according to this ruling I can steal anything I want, reword it and sell it for profit? Don't think so.

3. These aren't facts since thanks to my broken English thief got my article wrong!

--Ivan Bajlo 00:01, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So what you are saying Wikipedia can legally steal my entire website on which I spent years researching and building it up and get a way with it? What is the point of Copyright then? I don't mind adding parts of my content to Wikipedia but people are starting to steal my stuff to often and copy/pasting it on Wikipedia I might as well close my site and put big sign "STOLEN BY WIKIPEDIA - This site will never be updated again" --Ivan Bajlo 00:12, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, its 1:30 a.m. over here so I'm little cranky. I was planning to move all my articles to Wikipedia one day anyway but for now I don't want to fight edit wars and I need some way of financing my books addiction. ;-) Its just gets me mad when people copy/paste my stuff around and don't even bother to ask for permission or offer to help with my website. I'm doing update of my site so I'm reshuffling everything around so I'll fix both articles on my site and Wikipedia.

Lilly Greenough

Howdy! In regards to Lilly Greenough, I marked it as nn-bio because the text made no claim of notability, which is the litmus for nn-bio speedy versus AfD on folks that meet deletion criteria (per WP:CSD). No biggy, an AfD will work too. Best regards, - CHAIRBOY (☎) 19:29, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I saw in the intro paragraph that she had been reviewed in some journal, so that to me qualifies as some claim of notability. That's why I sent it to AfD instead. Regards, howch e ng {chat} 19:31, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A note, the "The Hants Journal" is a community webzine in a small town in Canada. Their top story this week (www.hantsjournal.ca) is about a local music teacher who was given a plaque by his band. :) Again, no biggy, VfD will sort it out in the end. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 19:46, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

rv on Talk:Multiple inheritance

Your revert to an earlier version replaced comments that had been removed by the author of the comments (Pangloss) because the changes had been made to the page. I'm not sure why you reverted... -- Doug Bell (talk/contrib) 19:48, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Luis Herrera Estrella

I wanted to drop you a note to let you know I disagreed with your finding of no copyvio regarding this article, and placed my argument on the talk page. Let me know if that changes your mind. --Syrthiss 23:05, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

Dear Howcheng, thank you for responding to my reports re:copyright violations.. i do appreciate it. (ps. out of curiosity, does the author of said articles get notified of the violation?) Andjb 08:36, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you as well for the "Sprotect" on the WWII rank articles. I am at my 3rd revert on the SS ranks article and was wondering if you could revert to the last good version of that page as well (but we dont need a protection over there...yet). The anon IP user hit both the WWII rank article and SS rank page at the same time. I was also curious if you knew where to find the block templates (the ones with the big red Xs on them). I am a new admin and am trying to learn how it all works. Thanks! -Husnock 18:55, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Further problems on WWII and SS pages

The user who was blocked and reverted is now logging on under a further sockpuppet: User:Roitr. This guy won't seem to take no for an answer. Any suggestions? -Husnock 19:29, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Roitr is back with a vengence, again adding disputed edits to teh SS ranks and comparative WWII article. This guy will not go away until he is permanently blocked, I feel, and then will continue with further sockpuppets. Thanks for your assistance with this. -Husnock 21:02, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocks

I notice you just indef blocked User:Tt1 and User:Roitr, one of these you had blocked for 24 hours and the other was blocked by another user for 24 hours, as there were no unblocks the 24 hour blocks are currently effective as the shorter of the blocks. --pgk^(talk) 19:41, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the WP:AN discussion on the issue. Indefinite blocks for simply evading a 24 hour block are probably not appropriate. - Taxman ^Talk 20:51, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But my entry was true. That is realy said.

World Wide Web War I

Nice job on closing out the WWWWI AfD. What a disaster that was. I'm just glad the reasonable people beat out all of the fans from those various pages. --Cyde Weys 15:54, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Philadelphia Request

Hi,

I would appreciate you looking at this page and making some comments in favor of the merger.

Category talk:Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Thanks! evrik 16:57, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Howcheng for inviting me to talk to you about any issues concerning my articles. I have created an article on All Saints Catholic High School, and would like for it to be accessible from the Main Page. If you could help me in this endeavour, it would be greatly appreciated.

Sincerly,

 --Darth mhaw 00:18, 20 January 2006 (UTC)Darth Mhaw[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Torc, P.A.C. Bloos

Can you explain how you got a no consensus on this when it seems clearly 4-1 in favor of deletion? I've listed it at WP:DRV. User:Zoe|^(talk) 00:56, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Interstate 76 (east) and Interstate 4

We're having a problem with SPUI removing the {{routeboxint}} from these pages. We've tried discussions on the talk page and a Mediation Cabal, which suggests that we leave the routebox in the page. However, SPUI continues to revert. Although I am an admin, I came to you because I could be viewed as biased in this situation, and because you do work with road pages. Could you please take a look? Thanks, --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 02:14, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's being taken care of- thanks anyway. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 02:54, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Zapatero and your permanent locking of these articles after editing them

Perhaps you would care to unlock the 5 articles you edited and then locked nearly 2 weeks ago. Or are you planning on keeping them locked forever in a further defiance of policy. Admins are not above policy and I have no idea why you insist on keepiong these articles locked for so long. The editorial dispute got sorted ages ago. Please can you give me an expanation of why you edited the articles and then protected them for 11 days and counting, SqueakBox 16:18, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User_talk:Zapatancas#Peace treaty proposal. 11 days would seem excessive protection given other editors might want to edit it. I don't right now so I wasn't asking for help for me but to uphold wikipedia's free editing policy for all those potential editors who deserve the freedom to edit these articles. After your editing and then locking the article you then appeared to forget about it, which is where my good faith got stretched. Anyway thanks for unlocking them and have a nice weekend, SqueakBox 18:16, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Help needed for the 2nd bid for deletion of Afshar experiment article

Dear Howcheng, less than a month ago, there was a decisive Keep vote (16 Keeps to 1 Delete) for the Afshar experiment article. Now another ill-wisher has initiated a ridiculous 2nd bid. I would appreciate if you could kindly end this abrasive abuse of Wikipedia procedures by promptly closing the vote. Best regards. -- Prof. Afshar 09:22, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sam Higginbottom

Hi, just a quick note to ask you to let me know when you remove my speedy delete tags from articles. I had not submitted that particular copyvio to WP:CP because I believed it was a speedy candidate, and therefore I only submitted it today. Thanks though, for correcting me on my mistake. Thanks, Werdna648^T/_C\^@ 12:19, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bruising

Just checking if you feel like you're taking one at DRV, and to tell you "chin up" and all if you were. I'd have deleted the articles if I were an admin and I closed them, but I think that we should be encouraging people to use their brains on closes.

So this is actually a quasi "good job". Just because I disagree with the outcome doesn't mean I think you should be taking quite the hammering you're taking! Next time, more prose all around, and please for the love of pete don't start counting votes!

brenneman ^(t)^(c) 14:39, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Yeah, I'm back... Sort of. Thanks for the kind words. 12.166.53.130 is me, and so are bunch of IPs which start with "71.250". I guess I just couldn't stand seeing the quality US soccer/MLS articles going down in my self-exposed exhile... (None of it your fault, as I see you are doing a fantastic job.) Which doesn't mean I'm back in full force as before, just a few things here and there. Especially List of foreign MLS players and Category:Soccer players in the United States by club. DR31 _(talk) 23:10, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kobe Bryant

Hmm regarding the kobe/smush 12-12 three's subject, i just didn't think it was too important to be placed in his own career achievements column. all said though, sorry if it caused you any problems, i won't take it out again. =) i hope you liked the extra tidbits in his career section though, i wrote that one day when i felt like expanding it more. by the way, he was pretty phenomenal tonight huh? 81 is something to behold~! -- MCDRLx 10:11, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Afd

Thanks for helping close the Gastrich Afd's. Can you give me a list of who's votes you discounted so that I can do the same for other Afds. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 19:29, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I will discount everyone except God of War out of the votes you didn't count. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 19:47, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pics

I would very much appreciate it if you could help me by incorporating some pictures into an article; their links can be found in the discussion page of Horseheads High School. Thanks! (Courier new 04:41, 24 January 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Mazzio's/Flash

Ha, I go to the Mazzio's site today and I can see the Flash now. Maybe they realized it wasn't working in FF and fixed it cuz it certainly wasn't doing anything for me the other day. Anyway, thanks for checking that. howch e ng {chat} 01:14, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Though that music on their main page just about drove me insane ;) ! -- Jonel | Speak 01:24, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Context

I see you editted this template, but didn't include the changes I requested at Template_talk:Context#Please_add_category_sort_key. – Doug Bell ^{talk•contrib} 02:14, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

George Madeira rewrite...

Any problems if I rewrite the George Maderia article? My father has been doing research on Mr. Maderia for the past few years and has accumulated substantial research. I expect the length would substantially increase.

Also, is it kosher to put in off-line references for most footnotes? Most of the source material is G. Maderia's unscanned ancient newspaper articles under various pseudonyms.

Charles Merriam

subst

Thank you for reminding me. :-) *sigh* --Zsinj 19:59, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Cambridge University Labour Club

I'd speedied the article after an editor complained about the AfD nom and then speedying of Hull University Labour Club as nn-club. Since neither he nor I could figure out the difference in notability between the two, I speedied Cambridge's and am in the process of AfDing Oxford's Labour club. They seem just about as notable as the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's College Democrats, in that they're not notable at all. -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 20:08, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WTF, none of these meet speedy criteria by anyone's imagination. Hull should not have been speedied - and speedying the others to even the score is bizzare logic. --Doc ^ask? 23:01, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]