User talk:LilSpiffy

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LilSpiffy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The block is no longer necessary because I was blocked describing other user's activity as we use the same computer and share the same IP address

Decline reason:

Sorry, the technical evidence shows that you were accessing the same networks at the same time. Both accounts have made similar edits to the same articles. It's very unlikely that the accounts belong to separate individuals. Mike V • Talk 15:56, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LilSpiffy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The block is no longer necessary because I understand what I am blocked for and promise to follow the rules next time

Decline reason:

In regard to your comment below, refer to WP:BROTHER. PhilKnight (talk) 21:23, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please explain? Were you in fact running both of those accounts yourself? Crow^Caw 16:24, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The other account belongs to my brother so while im not around sometimes he uses my account if i forgot to log out reason being we are using the same computer, I was only aware of this recently as I was getting many warnings from administrators. LilSpiffy (talk) 16:28, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please observe that according to WP:BLANKING, declined unblock requests may not be removed while the block is still active. Favonian (talk) 11:36, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request for unblocking of user account

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LilSpiffy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Greetings, my user account has been blocked for more than a year now. I was requesting that it be unblocked as I got to read and understand the Wikipedia policies. To show I have learnt from my mistake I created another account which I used to create quality Wikipedia articles. I also have been working on developing Southern Africa articles with a group of other users. I admit I did something wrong. So I was requesting to countinue being part of the Wikipedia community of editors creating information for the whole world. @Ponyo: LilSpiffy (talk) 09:51, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Are you serious?!? You were blocked for sockpuppetry and so you choose to state you decided to engage in more sockpuppetry and block evasion?!? How on earth does this show you can be trusted not to engage in sockpuppetry in the future?!? Yamla (talk) 12:15, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi LilSpiffy! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 18:15, Tuesday, October 18, 2016 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, LilSpiffy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi LilSpiffy! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 10:23, Thursday, November 9, 2017 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Alternative Accounts

This is an alternative account of TheBeastdot.

This is an alternative account of Newboyreloaded.

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LilSpiffy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Being blocked from the English Wikipedia for two year. I request to be unblocked as the block is no longer necessary because I finally understand what I'm blocked for and have read the terms and policies to understand them, therefore I will not be involved in any socket puppetry of any sort, and will start making productive contributions to Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

Apparently standard off clock started in October. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:17, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Two years? You were editing with TheBeastdot (talk · contribs) earlier this year. --Yamla (talk) 12:33, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Been blocked in the English Wikipedia for two years but not on other Wikimedia Projects @ Yamla (talk · contribs) --LilSpiffy (talk) 12:37, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The fact this (recently renamed) account has not been blocked on other Wikimedia projects is irrelevant when it comes to Yamla's comment, as your most recent sock here was blocked last October, and that is when the WP:STANDARDOFFER clock started ticking. If you're clean since then, that's a good sign, but you need to be completely clear and aboveboard about when you were last actively sockpuppeting for a fair consideration of your request to be made. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 12:59, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying. Since the block of the accounts no sock puppetry has been made. @ The Bushranger (talk · contribs) -- LilSpiffy (talk) 13:12, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

English Wikipedia:The mentioned last account was blocked at 17th October 2016. I was requesting the fellow admins to re-review the unblock request and give a chance to show worthiness to the @ Dlohcierekim (talk · contribs) and team. -- LilSpiffyTalk 17:07, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]