User talk:SCC California

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, SCC California! Thank you for your contributions. I am Wikih101 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Wikih101 (talk) 03:08, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SCC California, you are invited to the Co-op!

Hi there! SCC California, you are invited to The Co-op, a gathering place for editors where you can find mentors to help you build and improve Wikipedia. If you're looking for an editor who can help you out, please join us! I JethroBT (I'm a Co-op mentor)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 18:06, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Suds Jain

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Suds Jain requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GILO A&E⇑ 19:51, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Suds Jain for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Suds Jain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suds Jain until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:53, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, SCC California. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 07:31, 30 November 2018 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi SCC California! You created a thread called Image removal by bot at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Our Children's Trust) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Our Children's Trust.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hi, this article is quite short and could use more information on the organization's history and founder. I have added some citations that could help with that. Thanks!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Citrivescence}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Citrivescence (talk) 13:54, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act of 2019, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clean Air Act (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:18, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice at the top of your talk page

Just to let you know, there's a notice at the top of your talk page for July 14. It's now July 19, so you don't need it anymore.

Don't worry about the edit I made. It was not important and you can revert if you want, as you have done. --Comment by Selfie City (talk about my contributions) 18:02, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know - I completely forgot about the notice. SCC California (talk) 18:33, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Carbon fee and dividend, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Delaney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:09, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Adding a graph based on all the National polling data

Hello, I was wondering if it was possible for you to add a graph above the National polling section of the Nationwide opinion polling for the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries page. To give you an idea of what it could look like, here is a page on Opinion polls in Canada : https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_2019_Canadian_federal_election#National_polls. While it may be weird for me to ask this, especially since there is already a graph for the poll aggregators, I noticed that the poll aggregators don't include every poll. Therefore, having a graph based on all the polling data would remedy this situation.

Comment by MikkelJSmith (talk) 23:39, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - unfortunately, I don't know how to make these graphs. We previously had these ones on the US page, which were made my Mélencron, but they stopped updating it back in the beginning of July so we switched to this format. Best SCC California (talk) 00:44, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 United States House of Representatives elections in California, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kevin McCarthy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:32, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

538

Hey,

I was wondering what you do you think of including 538? They've been doing updates every few days for about a few weeks now. The thing though is that they currently do them through Nate Silver's Twitter : https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/1202417527143272448

I'm guessing it still counts as a reliable source since it's technically 538? That's what we did for info that came from Twitter during the Canadian election (i.e. if it came from a journalist from a trusted publication we used them). P.S. I lost my previous account if you were wondering. - MikkelJSmith (talk) 00:35, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have no problem with that if the data is updated regularly, but I recommend posting it at Talk:Nationwide opinion polling for the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries. Thanks - SCC California (talk) 22:50, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

SCC California, I'll do it right now. Thanks for the advice. MikkelJSmith (talk) 00:23, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]