User talk:Grand'mere Eugene/Archives/2017/July
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Grand'mere Eugene. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Max Ritvo has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 22:13, 2 July 2017 (UTC)March for Science Portland
Do you think any of these "See also" links are worth keeping? I was asked to remove them during the GA review, but would appreciate a third opinion. Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:39, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
- I followed the back-and-forth in the GA review, and I was puzzled that the reviewer was so adamant about deleting the See also section. I'm wondering if the reviewer thought the list too politically-oriented, maybe part of the reviewer's NPOV perception, similar to the odd complaint on the Protests against Trump sidebar/footer issue. I personally like See also sections, but I don't know the etiquette of adding back at this point after passing GA. Maybe wait a bit, and add back gently, perhaps starting with 2017 in science and List of environmental protests, which both include links to March for Science Portland, so appropriate and not overtly political. BTW, thanks for including the link to Post-truth politics, which I very much appreciated. Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 04:27, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for your two cents! Much appreciated. ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:34, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Teamwork Barnstar |
| For your team work on Nevertheless, she persisted. Bearian (talk) 00:32, 2 May 2017 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
|
The Special Barnstar |
| Thanks for all your help with 'Deana Haggag' and for teaching us about the copyright issues, etc. We're working hard to get more notable women curators on Wikipedia! Thank you again, and for editing so inclusively on this important platform! Notfacebook7 (talk) 00:42, 18 July 2017 (UTC) |