User talk:Timba Taufik

Welcome!

Hello, Golden-Investors, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Golden-Investors/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Ruy (talk) 07:37, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Golden-Investors/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Golden-Investors/sandbox, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ruy (talk) 07:37, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|username Your reason here}} }} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Alexf^(talk) 10:11, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Timba Taufik (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Timba Taufik (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I am sorry to violate Wikipedia's policies, and I accept the reasons given why i was blocked. Honestly i was new on wikipedia and i wasn't well exposed to all Wikipedia's policies, I really promise to change and edit my pages following Wikipedia's guidelines. I Will be so glad if my request is put into consideration

Decline reason:

You forgot to tell us what you'll write about, now that you know it was inappropriate for you to write about Golden Investors. Yamla (talk) 12:52, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Timba Taufik (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Timba Taufik (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I am sorry to violate Wikipedia's policies, and I accept the reasons given why i was blocked. Honestly i was new on wikipedia and i wasn't well exposed to all Wikipedia's policies, I really promise to change and edit my pages following Wikipedia's guidelines. I Will be so glad if my request is put into consideration. I promise not to advertise or promote anything on Wikipedia but just writing about major points of view about something instead of promoting a product or company

Decline reason:

I have renamed your account, which resolves that aspect of the block. However, this request suggests to me that you still intend to make edits related to your conflict of interest, either about your company or its field. We're not going to unblock you to, in the short term, do that. Please tell us how your edits will be consistent with WP:COI and what topics other than your company/its field you will edit about. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 21:24, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Timba Taufik (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry to violate Wikipedia's policies, and I accept the reasons given why i was blocked. Honestly, i was new on Wikipedia and i wasn't well exposed to all Wikipedia's policies, I really promise to change and edit my pages following Wikipedia's WP: COI, and on my next page I promise to write about the definition, history, and references of the company without the intent of advertising or marketing the company, I will be glad if my request is put into consideration.

Decline reason:

You are not listening to us. You will not be unblocked to write about the company. You need to read WP:COI. In your next request, you should tell us what edits you want to make, given that you will not be unblocked to write about the company. If your next unblock request is not an improvement, you risk losing access to this page. PhilKnight (talk) 10:07, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.