User talk:Thajdkakdjfakjkaj

This user may have left Wikipedia. Thajdkakdjfakjkaj has not edited Wikipedia since 11 November 2017. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome!

Hello, Gmk7, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users - please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions or place {{helpme}} on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Happy editing! • Gene93k (talk) 14:37, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion for Nicolau Pereira

Hello. I notice that you started a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicolau Pereira but you have not stated a reason why Nicolau Pereira should be deleted. Please add a deletion rationale to the discussion. • Gene93k (talk) 14:37, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gmk7, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Gmk7! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hamming code

Thanks for your edit on Hamming code. Note that the notation (n,k,d) is correct for block codes and is conflicting with (n,M,d). Both of them are used in the literature. In any case, since the Hamming code is linear, I agree with the change to [n,k,d]. Also see Block_code#Popular_notation. ylloh (talk) 03:08, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Francis Xavier with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 19:59, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am deleting the notice in the manner prescribed by the guidelines (strike through) because of the explanation that the removal of content was unintentionally made in connection with other changes. Happy editing. Donner60 (talk) 20:08, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]