User talk:Gjergj Ceka

August 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Epirus (ancient state) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Epirus (ancient state) was changed by Gjergj Ceka (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95392 on 2013-08-22T01:04:12+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:04, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Epirus. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Widr (talk) 04:52, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dhërmi, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Dhërmi was changed by Gjergj Ceka (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.874414 on 2013-08-22T10:31:57+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:32, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Greece, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Greece was changed by Gjergj Ceka (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.862053 on 2013-08-22T13:50:55+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:51, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Palasë shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 17:30, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gjergj Ceka ‎, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 17:38, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 4:44 pm, Yesterday (UTC−4)