User talk:Youngmordy

Welcome!

Hello, Gardi.mongol, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Daniel Middleton, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Wgolf (talk) 21:46, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Daniel Middleton

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Daniel Middleton requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wgolf (talk) 21:46, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Daniel Middleton

The article Daniel Middleton has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. KonveyorBelt 22:04, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Hello, I'm Konveyor Belt. I noticed that you removed a Biographies of Living Persons PROD, from Daniel Middleton‎, and I wanted to let you know that I have replaced it. Please don't remove these Biographies of Living Persons PRODs from articles unless they contain at least one reliable source or were created before 18 March 2010. If you oppose the deletion of an article under this process, please consider adding reliable sources to the article or commenting at the respective talk page. Thank you. KonveyorBelt 22:10, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tottenham Hotspur F.C.. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:01, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Daniel Middleton for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel Middleton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Middleton until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KonveyorBelt 22:13, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Real Madrid C.F., without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. QED237 (talk) 22:23, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Toni Kroos, you may be blocked from editing. --Jaellee (talk) 19:40, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Toni Kroos. Amaury (talk) 19:48, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013-14 FC Erchim season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Sports Stadium. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2014–15 Premier League. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. QED237 (talk) 12:26, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Real Madrid C.F.. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 11:32, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Christian Fuchs, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. JMHamo (talk) 14:59, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Arturo Vidal. Mattythewhite (talk) 08:00, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ulaanbaatar Unaganuud

Hi, please stop creating this page, it is an exact duplicate of Ulaanbaatar University and is completely unnecessary. Fenix down (talk) 08:12, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well Ulaanbaatar University was chenged their name Ulaanbaatar Unaganuud and i want to change the Wikipedia name but i don't know how to so i created anothor page. Sorry about that but how do you change title name can you tell me.

I'm not seeing a change of name here, they're just referred to as UBU FC. If you think per WP:COMMONNAME there is a need to move, then you should go through the proper requested move process. Not sure how much interest there is in a discussion on this minor club, so in this instance if you can show me sources confirming a name change I will move it. Fenix down (talk) 08:45, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This from the MFF seems quite clear about their official name. I don't thnk we should be using a transliteration of their Mongolian name. Fenix down (talk) 07:26, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Soyombiin Barsuud

Hi Gardi.mongol, do you know where Soyombiin Barsuud play? I can't find anything online. Are they based in UB? Fenix down (talk) 07:19, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes,well Mongolian teams or not that popular so i think you can't find anything online. I know Soyombiin Barsuud because i am Mongolian. There based in UB, Mongolia.

Thanks, the season map should be updated accordingly. Feel free to do it if you get there before me. Fenix down (talk) 07:30, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2015 Mongolia Premier League

Hi, Could you please not update the infobox until the end of the season. It is meant to be a summary of the season, not a live update. Could you please also not change the format of the league table. The source is quite clear that the current stage is a group stage and seems identical to last season. If you have a different source (it needn't be in English) please update, but you shouldn't change the article so it is no longer in line with the sources provided. Thanks. Fenix down (talk) 07:30, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at 2015 Mongolia Premier League. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. I have asked you several times not to update the infobox with live stats as it is meant to be a summary of the season at its close. this is beginning to get disruptive. Fenix down (talk) 07:43, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at 2015 Mongolia Premier League. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Fenix down (talk) 12:28, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple Accounts

Hi, I was on the history page of the Mongolian National Premier League and noticed that a number of editors have been editing this and other articles in similar areas with remarkably similar user names. I have to ask myself whether these accounts are linked. Per WP:SOCK, WP has a clear policy that the use of multiple accounts by the same user is expressly forbidden except in certain circumstances. In this instance, it appears that these accounts are all contributing to the same page or discussion with multiple accounts, something which is not allowed. As such, could you please let me know whether you have any connection to any of the accounts below:

If you do, could you please provide reasons as to why you need separate accounts. Thanks. Fenix down (talk) 11:41, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of most viewed non Vevo videos on YouTube

The article List of most viewed non Vevo videos on YouTube has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Far too much discrimination, as this "division" of YouTube videos is not a natural selection or one that sources focus on. Also approaching a POV Fork of the main YouTube video list

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MASEM (t) 14:56, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, List of most viewed non Vevo videos on YouTube

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, List of most viewed non Vevo videos on YouTube. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – List of most viewed YouTube videos expect Vevo videos. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at List of most viewed YouTube videos expect Vevo videos – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Peter Rehse (talk) 20:38, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of most viewed non Vevo videos on YouTube for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of most viewed non Vevo videos on YouTube is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most viewed non Vevo videos on YouTube until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MASEM (t) 14:21, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016 Mongolian Futsal League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MFF. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at UBU FC, you may be blocked from editing. That's not how you move articles, doing so means the hitory of the article gets split between the two pages. Please don't do this again. If you want to move an article, please use WP:RM. Fenix down (talk) 11:36, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Template:2015–16 Premier League table, you may be blocked from editing. Qed237 (talk) 16:05, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Fenix down (talk) 16:39, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Hello, I'm Qed237. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Template:UEFA Euro 2016 Group C table has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Qed237 (talk) 15:30, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Template:UEFA Euro 2016 Group F table. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 20:49, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Pogba

Until Paul Pogba's transfer to Manchester United is officially confirmed (which may not happen at all), please do not make edits suggesting it has happened, such as your recent changes to the 'List of most expensive association football transfers' page. They are unhelpful and incorrect until the transfer is officially confirmed. The Raincloud Kid (talk) 02:39, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Fenix down (talk) 07:46, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked you again because your recent editing continues to be disruptive. You really need to stop moving articles against consensus, and especially when you are not doing it right. Changing pages manually to redirects means the page history is lost at thenew target. I would seriously recommend that you begin to engage with other editors, youre talk page is essentially a long list of warnings about your behaviour in articles from a number of editors. Fenix down (talk) 07:55, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Gardi.mongol. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Canion Shijirbat

The article Canion Shijirbat has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. reddogsix (talk) 15:32, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2016 BunDucksLiga

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 2016 BunDucksLiga requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.), but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. SorryNotSorry ✽ ✉ 14:31, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Names

Hello, I appreciate your desire to improve articles about Mongolian footbal. However, when you alter the spellings of names, it breaks the wiki links and causes "red links". Please leave the spellings as they are currently transliterated so that we can avoid this. Thanks.--Gri3720 (talk) 02:42, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of SB (Group)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on SB (Group) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, society, or group, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hitro talk 08:35, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Gardi.mongol. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at 2018 FIFA World Cup squads, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:13, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:2017 Mongolian Premier League table

Template:2017 Mongolian Premier League table has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hhkohh (talk) 02:35, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Gardi.mongol. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop with the uncited changes

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 15:12, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Name Spellings

Hello, when editing on English language Wikipedia articles please use the English transliterated spellings as per the sources. Thank you.--Gri3720 (talk) 11:15, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Uuganbat Batmönkh

The article Uuganbat Batmönkh has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. qedk (t 桜 c) 14:30, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Davaajav Battör

The article Davaajav Battör has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. qedk (t 桜 c) 14:31, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mönkh-Erdene Enkhtaivan

The article Mönkh-Erdene Enkhtaivan has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. qedk (t 桜 c) 14:32, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dölgöön Amaraa

The article Dölgöön Amaraa has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. qedk (t 桜 c) 14:32, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sündorj Janchiv

The article Sündorj Janchiv has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. qedk (t 桜 c) 14:32, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

National Goalkeeper Academy of Mongolia moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, National Goalkeeper Academy of Mongolia, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Barkeep49 (talk) 16:15, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stop with the uncited changes

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Gri3720 (talk / edits) 20:00, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:National Goalkeeper Academy of Mongolia concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:National Goalkeeper Academy of Mongolia, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of AIESEC in NUM

The article AIESEC in NUM has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

insufficient evidencefor notability of this university organization

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 10:11, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:National Goalkeeper Academy of Mongolia

Hello, Youngmordy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "National Goalkeeper Academy of Mongolia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DannyS712 (talk) 08:14, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]