User talk:Gandhijr

Welcome to Wikipedia

Hello Gandhijr, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.
Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard — a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.
Guide to Wikipedia — A thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia.

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

Community portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Gandhijr, good luck, and have fun. Correct Knowledge^«৳alk» 17:03, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Verifiability vs. OR

Sorry, but you need to understand that Wikipedia is not about trying to figure out what's true, applying analysis and understanding of situations to determine the real, underlying truth. Doing that is original research, and not allowed. Rather, what we do is report what reliable sources say. If you can find a reliable source that says the opposite of the NYT article, then we can include both opinions. But you can't just argue based on your own personal understanding of the facts involved. Qwyrxian (talk) 03:23, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gandhijr REPLY:

I have provided article from well renowned Indian scholarAsghar Ali Engineer who recently passed away and has been working on the draft for codification of Muslim Personnel Law. Here is the link to the article ^[1]. You point to an article written regarding the hindu muslim hatred and not about Muslim personnel law that too by an author who probably never even looked at the Muslim personnel law to understand what it is.

Not sure how you blame me that i am pushing some agenda. Not even Bangladesh has Sharia Law. Both India and Bangladesh declared themselves as secular nations and use the British Muhammadan Law as foundation for the legal system.Gandhijr (talk) 03:54, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We could possibly add another source with a contradictory statement, though I'm not sure that newageislam counts as a reliable source. But if it does, then we have to include both the NYT assessment and Engineer's assessment. I don't mean to say that you're pushing an agenda (that's an WP:NPOV problem), but this is a WP:OR issue--we have to go by what the sources say, and when sources contradict, we include both opinions, unless we can really conclusively show that one side is in the vast minority. Qwyrxian (talk) 04:39, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GANDHIJR REPLY TO QWYRXIAN: Here is the link for rediff article where anjum Choudary wants a march in delhi demanding sharia law ^[2] India is lucky that it does not have such fanatics as anjum choudary and we need to present the right picture for the people who come here to read about Islam in India. Gandhijr (talk) 03:44, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Illegal immigration in India may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Bangladeshis]] form the largest group of migrants in India followed by [[Pakistani]] and [Nepalese]]. <ref name="censusindia.gov.in"/>.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:02, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Fabtran

Hello, Gandhijr. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Fabtran".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Vin09 (talk) 04:49, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Atul Kochhar

Please note that the riot around the offensive tweet is already covered in the section "Restaurant". There is no need to have the info double in the article. The Banner talk 19:30, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://www.countercurrents.org/engineer020509.htm

[2] ttp://www.rediff.com/news/report/indian-muslims-oppose-move-to-impose-sharia-laws/20120227.htm

[1]

[2]