User talk:FredericoHibertus95

Welcome!

Hello, FredericoHibertus95, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Mohamed Salah have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Mosmof (talk) 05:39, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm Qed237. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living person on Mohamed Salah, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. QED237 (talk) 13:01, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:PsyHangoverCover.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:PsyHangoverCover.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 11:45, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:เพื่อนตำรวจ 2014.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:เพื่อนตำรวจ 2014.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 16:00, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:เพื่อนตำรวจ 2014.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:เพื่อนตำรวจ 2014.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:16, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox dates

Hi, when updating club stats in the infobox you should update the |pcupdate= or |club-update= parameter by adding five tildes (~~~~~), which generates the specific time the update was made. Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 13:58, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Asia's Got Talent

Regarding your edit to the said article, it's nice to add the Indonesian acts seen only on the ANTV broacast of the show since we from outside Indonesian aren't aware of them, but we have leave some mark to distinguish them from the at-large/AXN version. So leave the astersiks be. Terimah kasih. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 12:42, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Juan Mata. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in loss of editing privileges. See #Infobox dates QED237 (talk) 18:08, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015–16 Premier League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aleksandar Mitrovic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to 2015–16 Premier League, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 21:44, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Geoffrey Kondogbia, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. See #Infobox dates Qed237 (talk) 21:38, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox dates

Hi, when updating club stats in the infobox you should update the |pcupdate= or |club-update= parameter by adding five tildes (~~~~~), which generates the specific time the update was made. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 13:49, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stats in football players' infoboxes and update of career stats

Hi.

When you update the stats in football players' infoboxes please remember that you should also update the timestamps as of when the stats are correct. This is done by updating |pcupdate= (or |club-update=) parameter when updating club appearances and goals, or |ntupdate= (or |nationalteam-update=) when updating national team appearances and goals. The easiest way to do this is to use five tildes, which automatically converts to the current time. For example |club-update=~~~~~.

When you update the career statistics please remember that you should also update that timestamp as well to a time when the stats are correct. This is done by manually updating the date above or below the statistics table. By doing this we show when the stats were last updated and it prevents other editors from accidentally updating the stats again.

This is done to show other editors when the stats were last updated and prevent them from accidentally updating the stats again, and also it shows readers that it has been updated.

Please keep this in mind. Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 14:06, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep this in mind. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:36, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re your recent edit to Jesse Lingard's infobox. The timestamp you removed was correct, and the Lingard article has generally used the full date-and-time format, so I'll restore it.

As mentioned above, the as-of timestamp should be set to a date/time at which the stats are unambiguously correct. If you're bringing the stats up to date, it's preferable to use the five tildes, to produce the current time and date. If you prefer to use a date alone – some articles do tend to use that format – then please use a date after the date of the subject's last match, and before their club's next match. Thank you for listening. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 12:02, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2015–16 Premier League, you may be blocked from editing. Qed237 (talk) 19:40, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Paul Pogba. Stats already updated for today's match. Please consult with sources first before attempting to update. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:10, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Chris Smalling, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Failing to consult cited sources when updating stats - omitted midweek European appearance Mattythewhite (talk) 16:07, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Goleo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Goleo.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:06, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:EURO 1984 mascot.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:EURO 1984 mascot.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:05, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:EURO 1980 mascot.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:EURO 1980 mascot.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:05, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:RenatoSanches.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:RenatoSanches.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 18:08, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Whpq: user reuploaded the image, claiming fair use. SLBedit (talk) 00:55, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Renato-Sanches.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Renato-Sanches.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 04:11, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:RenatoSanches.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:RenatoSanches.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 04:11, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Renato Sanches.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Renato Sanches.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 04:12, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Uploading images you find on the web

You cannot copy files you find on the internet and claim you hold the copyright and have released it under a free license. This is a copyright violation. Continued activity like this may result in you being blocked from editting. -- Whpq (talk) 04:13, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Amazing-race-asia-season-5.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Amazing-race-asia-season-5.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 04:15, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations

Please note that copyrighted images you find on the Internet cannot be used in articles except in narrow circumstances - for these please see WP:NFCC. Images of living people and galleries of non-free images are specifically disallowed. Thanks, Black Kite (talk) 09:23, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly you didn't read what I said above, and simply re-uploaded and put the non-free images in a gallery page. Please do not do this again - you are simply wasting other editor's time and may be blocked if it happens again. Black Kite (talk) 10:07, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use images

Non-free content may on;y be used in the article for which a valid non-free usage rationale has been provided. The use of the mascots in the FIFA World Cup mascot is not valid and I have undone your edit. Do not put them back without discussion. -- Whpq (talk) 17:53, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, FredericoHibertus95. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Ashley Young, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Incorrect stats update, not consulting source, above. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:30, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Player stats

Hi

Just to say, I have had to correct a few of your updates because you have missed League Cup appearances. Don't just simply add one appearance on to the last update, it is very possible that the player has made multiple appearances since his stats were last updated.

Cheers

--Stuart1234 (talk) 10:15, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Zlatan Ibrahimović. Qed237 (talk) 20:21, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rising Star Indonesia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 17:14, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:MellyGoeslaw.png

Thanks for uploading File:MellyGoeslaw.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 15:45, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:BebiRomeo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:BebiRomeo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 15:46, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:BebiRomeo.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:BebiRomeo.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 17:03, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BebiRomeo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BebiRomeo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 17:04, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:MellyGoeslaw.png

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:MellyGoeslaw.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 17:07, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MellyGoeslaw.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MellyGoeslaw.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 17:07, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Please do not upload images of living persons that you have found on other websites as you did at File:BebiRomeo.jpg and File:MellyGoeslaw.png. Such images are non-free and cannot be used in biographies of living persons as they fail the first criteria of our non-free content policy. --AussieLegend (✉) 17:14, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Anmar Almubaraki, without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Giant Snowman 08:25, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Anmar Almubaraki. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Giant Snowman 16:13, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not

Please do not change content, as you did at : 2017 Liga 1. , Indonesia Soccer Championship A is not League, its just a Turnament. Tommy Syahputra (talk) 08:56, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Persija Jakarta (IPL), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AFC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disruptive editing Wikipedia, as you did at 2017 Liga 1, you may be blocked from editing. TommySyahputra (talk) 07:06, 28 November 2024 UTC [refresh]

Please do not continue to add add collapsible content to the tables in Rising Star Indonesia. If you had follwoed the link to MOS:SCROLL in this edit summary you would have seen that MOS:SCOLL says "Collapsible templates should not conceal article content by default upon page loading. This includes reference lists, tables and lists of article content, image galleries, and image captions." Please also note that I have made some edits to bring this article in line with the Manual of Style. Please be sure to read the edit summaries and do not revert the changes without justifying change in your edit summaries. --AussieLegend (✉) 15:43, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bastian Schweinsteiger

Hi, I've reverted your changes on Bastian Schweinsteiger and Manchester United as the move hasn't been completed yet, as it's waiting on a medical and a successful application of a visa. Darkson (I survived the 525!) 18:24, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rising Star Indonesia. AussieLegend (✉) 18:37, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You should take this last warning very seriously. You have received numerous warnings and have not responded to any of them, instead ignoring everything and removing MOS compliance and re-introdcucing errors that have been corrected. This is your fifth and final warning that you have received for your disruptive edits. --AussieLegend (✉) 18:45, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 19:17, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FredericoHibertus95 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not doing something wrong and user named AussieLegend and Widr blocking me for no reason, i am just editing Rising Star Indonesia, adding tables for the judges to make the judges list looks simple, is it wrong ???, while other user, making vandalism to wikipedia, their still active and not being blocked, i do not understand why do you become so mean to me, Yamla ?, PLEASE UNBLOCKED ME, I'M SORRY IF MY EDITING CLAIMED AS VANDALISM. ONCE AGAIN I'M REALLY SORRY IF I DOING WRONG THINGS. WIKIPEDIA IS MY LIFE. WIKIPEDIA IS THE REASON WHY I'M SPEND MY TIME UNTIL NIGHT JUST FOR GETTING THE INFORMATION.

Decline reason:

In addition to the disruptive editing, you've been abusing multiple accounts (SPI). If you continue to create new accounts such as WikiEazy and ZespriKiwi, they will continue to be blocked, and this account will remain blocked. —DoRD (talk) 12:24, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FredericoHibertus95 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

WikiEazy is my brother's account and ZespriKiwi is my nephew's account that they use in same computer with me, so both accounts have nothing to do with me so please unblock ZespriKiwi and WikiEazy.

Decline reason:

If, after all the warnings and explanations here on this talk page, you are still insisting that you have done nothing wrong, then you do not possess the competence to edit here (and that's without even looking at the socking issue). Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:17, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This sounds like WP:BROTHER and, in any case, is simply not believable. --Yamla (talk) 18:55, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/FredericoHibertus95, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 16:45, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]