User talk:Fmalexander

BC Furtney

This article isn't going to be speedy deleted. Please stop tagging it, as this is beginning to be disruptive. Any issue regarding the article should be addressed on its talkpage. If you continue to blank this article and tag it for speedy deletion, your account may have to be blocked. INeverCry 18:19, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to BC Furtney has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: BC Furtney was changed by Fmalexander (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.960334 on 2013-05-30T19:27:29+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:27, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring, as you did at BC Furtney. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. INeverCry 19:55, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason=I am both subject and administrator, attempting to delete page I created [[User:Fmalexander|Fmalexander]] [[Category:Understood, however the jenniferljones and fmalexander accounts are both mine, if that helps.]]

(talk) 20:41, 30 May 2013 (UTC)}}]]

Note that you are not an administrator here, and that you cannot use this criterion as there have been other editors to the article. This criterion is only for histories where the only edits other than minor typo correction, categorisation, etc, are by one account. This is not the case here - as we have told you in our edit summaries and on this talk page. When you get unblocked, you may use Proposed Deletion WP:PROD or Articles for Deletion WP:AFD. Peridon (talk) 21:00, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article in question was largely started by SDBTommy and the last time that it could have been deleted as an author request was before jenniferljones became its second editor. There are some instances where we allow people to have more than one account, but I would suggest to you that you keep to just using Fmalexander. Especially for articles that you have already edited. Ϣere SpielChequers 07:19, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]