User talk:Eyedentification

Lil Snvrk moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Lil Snvrk. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ... discospinster _talk 19:19, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. PhilKnight (talk) 17:54, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The AIV report: https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=1237209610&oldid=1237209416 PhilKnight (talk) 17:57, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eyedentification (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sockpuppet, I do know Lil Snvrk personally though. IF it counts as conflict of interest, then the Draft:Lil Snvrk page can wait until further sources are made. There are many verifiable sources relating to Lil Snvrk actually being signed to the Opium label. It was not vandalism. Eyedentification (talk) 18:49, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

What you are describing would seem to fall into WP:MEAT and WP:COI. Yamla (talk) 18:52, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Both your account and suspected other account have said there are many verifiable sources for the rapper being signed to the label, but neither of you have produced them. PhilKnight (talk) 19:03, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Every single time you say that this "Lil Snvrk" has "many verifiable sources", that nobody has ever heard of (very suspicious considering he is supposedly part of a big record label where every artist signed to it has millions of listeners), it is always either:

A self published "sourced" such as apple music or spotify where ~~you~~ , ahem "lil snvrk", publishes ~~your~~ their music on and say it's on the Opium label --- which anyone can do
A source that literally contains no information whatsoever or is a generic source to a website where not a single mention of "lil snvrk" is anywhere to be seen.

I reccomend seeking help, I'm not a doctor but you seem to suffer from major grandiose delusion as well as some variant of delusional misidentification syndrome, so yes, please do yourself a favor and see someone soon,,,I say that with genuine concern. Lil Sad Lil Happy (talk) 21:37, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]