User talk:Erbmjha2

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions have removed content without a good reason to do so. Content on Wikipedia should not be removed just because you disagree with it or because you think it's wrong, unless the claim is not verifiable. Instead, you should consider expanding the article with noteworthy and verifiable information of your own, citing reliable sources when you do so. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 17:22, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained mass deletions

Hello, I'm Ohnoitsjamie. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:23, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:11, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i am a resident of india and i have background in journalism.i know well what is relevent and what not.i was just removing wrong facts Erbmjha2 (talk) 18:32, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not mass delete referenced content AriTheHorse 18:40, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Bhagavad Gita. AriTheHorse 18:44, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. JBW (talk) 21:13, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Bhagavad Gita. You may NOT delete things without explanation even if you claim to be an expert. All removals MUST be accompanied by an adequate explanation. RetroCosmos (talk) 12:02, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Hi Erbmjha2! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at List of largest peaceful gatherings that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Shadow311 (talk) 17:54, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: K. Annamalai (February 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tutwakhamoe was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:K. Annamalai and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tutwakhamoe (talk) 00:10, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Erbmjha2! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tutwakhamoe (talk) 00:10, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ram mandir,Ayodhya

A tag has been placed on Ram mandir,Ayodhya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — kashmīrī ^TALK 13:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Vishnu Sahasranama. — kashmīrī ^TALK 13:23, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Kanyakumari have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Kanyakumari was changed by Erbmjha2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.916632 on 2024-03-02T17:23:21+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:23, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Devi Kanya Kumari. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Devi Kanya Kumari was changed by Erbmjha2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.862522 on 2024-03-02T17:32:51+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:32, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! -- Toddy1 (talk) 06:37, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Harivarasanam, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. -- Toddy1 (talk) 06:37, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know about the concept of verifiability? Your edits the article on Harivarasanam suggest not. All material in Wikipedia mainspace, including everything in articles, lists, and captions, must be verifiable. When you add material to articles, please include an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the material. In your edit, you removed information that had citations, and replaced it with sentences that did not. Even if you are sure something is true, it must have been previously published in a reliable source before you can add it.-- Toddy1 (talk) 06:43, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Varanasi, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you.-- Toddy1 (talk) 06:37, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI discussion notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — kashmīrī ^TALK 11:17, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DMacks (talk) 12:49, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mirroring here what I said at ANI: After your block expires, I suggest you seek out a mentor to provide you guidance in how to contribute constructively if you want to be a constructive member of the community. —C.Fred (talk) 12:52, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
please unblock me,i will always verify before editing in future. Erbmjha2 (talk) 13:01, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

please unblock me,i will always verify before editing in future. Erbmjha2 (talk) 13:01, 5 March 2024 Erbmjha2 (talk) 13:01, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Are you able to read the block notice above? It's in plain English. — kashmīrī ^TALK 13:07, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
please unblock me,i will always verify before editing in future. Please ,you can personally also check my every edit.I did forget to give citations and u will understand i never wanted to do any destructive editing,please unblock me,i will always verify before editing in future. Erbmjha2 (talk) 13:10, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your inability or refusal to follow the directions in the block notice reinforce my belief you are simply unable participate constructively here. Please stop wasting our time. DMacks (talk) 13:18, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you feel that you would be able to follow both the directions of the Wiki and the suggestions of the editors, then please seek mentoring after your block expires. edited I like Astatine (Talk to me) 18:28, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]