User talk:Eds Etd

June 2024

Hello, I'm Rkieferbaum. I noticed that you recently removed content from Macedonian diaspora without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Rkieferbaum (talk) 18:47, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ancient Macedonian Tomb (July 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cabrils was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Draft requires more work before submission, including but not limited to reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ancient Macedonian Tomb and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cabrils (talk) 00:40, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Epnesthede! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Cabrils (talk) 00:40, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Macedonian diaspora, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Remsense诉 01:56, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, once again you need to start using edit summaries for your edits. Otherwise, no one understands why you are making the changes you are, and any fiddling that isn't directly obviously from reliable sources is likely to be reverted. Remsense诉 02:07, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not insert fringe or undue weight content into articles, as you did to Clement of Ohrid. An article should not give undue weight to any aspects of the subject but should strive to treat each aspect with a weight appropriate to its significance to the subject. Please use the article's talk page to discuss the material and its appropriate weight within the article. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 04:34, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, you may be blocked from editing. Jingiby (talk) 04:36, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Demetrios1993 (talk) 05:30, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Demetrios1993 (talk) 05:30, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Alexander I of Yugoslavia. Jingiby (talk) 12:08, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Epnesthede, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 05:32, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Alexander I of Yugoslavia shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jingiby (talk) 05:42, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at List of flags of North Macedonia shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jingiby (talk) 14:32, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of flags of North Macedonia. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Jingiby (talk) 05:36, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, wikis, personal websites, and websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight. These sources may express views that are widely acknowledged as pushing a particular point-of-view, sometimes even extremist, being promotional in nature, or relying heavily on rumors and personal opinions. One of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 06:57, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 12:38, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Demetrios1993 (talk) 05:32, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of archaeological sites by country, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cerje. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 20:08, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation

Your edit to Idomenae has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Demetrios1993 (talk) 14:44, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dates

Hello. Please stop changing the dates of establishment and disestablishment of the Kruševo Republic. The content is sourced. While the Ilinden uprising begun in 2 August and thus it is celebrated in North Macedonia, the celebration itself bears no relevance to the date of establishment. The uprising did not only happen on this day anyway. StephenMacky1 (talk) 22:15, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prince Harald

Please do not add original research based on wp:unreliable source into the article concerning this person. There is no one reliable, secondary, independent source on the topic with the so-called Kingdom of Macedonia and this idea seems to be only an ephemeral short-lived proposal. The only secondary source used here is a pushed by you publication from Australian local Macedonian diaspora website. Its author does not hold any university degree and is not a historian. This is not welcomed here. Thanks. Jingiby (talk) 04:34, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Treaty of Bucharest (1913). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. StephenMacky1 (talk) 20:10, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Epnesthede, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 20:12, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jingiby (talk) 20:32, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. Jingiby (talk) 20:35, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello, I'm Cooldudeseven7. I noticed that you recently removed content from Macedonian literature without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Cooldudeseven7 (Discuss over a cup of tea?) 13:43, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Krste Misirkov. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 17:32, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Krste Misirkov, you may be blocked from editing. Jingiby (talk) 18:45, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Krste Misirkov, you may be blocked from editing. Jingiby (talk) 04:54, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Krste Misirkov. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jingiby (talk) 16:58, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 19:35, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Editing while logged out

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Demetrios1993 (talk) 20:41, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Demetrios1993 (talk) 20:42, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Demetrios1993 (talk) 21:10, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 22:02, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Eds Etd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked for disruptive editing as I kept putting my own information in as well as kept logging in and out to make sure no one removed my edits. I did this in order to not get targeted by the other user. I will not continue and will heed warnings when needed in the future as well as cite any piece of info I find important to put. Also I will add any concerns I may have on the talk page of the next wiki article I find lacking. Overall in the future I will be more careful with my edits and if another user removes my edit I will listen to their concerns on the talk page and will the user talk page instead of triggering an edit war as well as respect the three-revert rule Eds Etd (talk) 20:18, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I was blocked for disruptive editing as I kept putting my own information in as well as kept logging in and out to make sure no one removed my edits. I did this in order to not get targeted by the other user. I will not continue and will heed warnings when needed in the future as well as cite any piece of info I find important to put. Also I will add any concerns I may have on the talk page of the next wiki article I find lacking. Overall in the future I will be more careful with my edits and if another user removes my edit I will listen to their concerns on the talk page and will the user talk page instead of triggering an edit war as well as respect the three-revert rule [[User:Eds Etd|Eds Etd]] ([[User talk:Eds Etd#top|talk]]) 20:18, 26 November 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I was blocked for disruptive editing as I kept putting my own information in as well as kept logging in and out to make sure no one removed my edits. I did this in order to not get targeted by the other user. I will not continue and will heed warnings when needed in the future as well as cite any piece of info I find important to put. Also I will add any concerns I may have on the talk page of the next wiki article I find lacking. Overall in the future I will be more careful with my edits and if another user removes my edit I will listen to their concerns on the talk page and will the user talk page instead of triggering an edit war as well as respect the three-revert rule [[User:Eds Etd|Eds Etd]] ([[User talk:Eds Etd#top|talk]]) 20:18, 26 November 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I was blocked for disruptive editing as I kept putting my own information in as well as kept logging in and out to make sure no one removed my edits. I did this in order to not get targeted by the other user. I will not continue and will heed warnings when needed in the future as well as cite any piece of info I find important to put. Also I will add any concerns I may have on the talk page of the next wiki article I find lacking. Overall in the future I will be more careful with my edits and if another user removes my edit I will listen to their concerns on the talk page and will the user talk page instead of triggering an edit war as well as respect the three-revert rule [[User:Eds Etd|Eds Etd]] ([[User talk:Eds Etd#top|talk]]) 20:18, 26 November 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Eds Etd (talk) 20:18, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eds Etd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was putting extra info with citations while constantly having my info falsified by a user who has an open distain for me Eds Etd (talk) 23:38, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you:
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --Chris | Crazycomputers (talk) 03:56, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eds Etd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked for "Disruptive editing" as I kept putting my own information in. I will not continue and will heed warnings when needed in the future as well as cite any piece of info I find important to put. Also I will add any concerns I may have on the talk page of the next wiki article I find lacking Eds Etd (talk) 12:47, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Could you comment on the logged out editing accusation. Also, could you say how you will handle edit disagreements in future. PhilKnight (talk) 17:13, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It might be a good idea to read the edit warring policy and include in your appeal that you understand what edit warring is, and what you will do to avoid edit warring in the future. --Chris | Crazycomputers (talk) 19:51, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]