User talk:Entertainmentnow

Speedy deletion nomination of Jonathan Fudge

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Jonathan Fudge, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. SwisterTwister talk 07:04, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Entertainmentnow, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Jonathan Fudge, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — Abhishek ^Talk 07:04, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Jonathan Fudge

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Jonathan Fudge, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 07:22, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Jonathan Fudge. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 07:24, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jonathan Fudge

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Jonathan Fudge requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 16:05, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Jonathan Fudge

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Jonathan Fudge, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 16:07, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Jonathan Fudge, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Abhishek ^Talk 16:09, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Hairhorn (talk) 16:29, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Jonathan Fudge

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Jonathan Fudge. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 16:35, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Jonathan Fudge, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 16:40, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reported to AIV

Hi Entertainmentnow, this is a notice to let you know that I have reported the issue of you removing speedy deletion templates to administrators. An administrator should assess the report in a short while, and they will take any apprioate actions. Please wait for an administrator before taking any further actions yourself. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 16:42, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Jonathan Fudge, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Abhishek ^Talk 16:58, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours for for repeated removal of speedy deletion templates, as you did at Jonathan Fudge. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. RL0919 (talk) 17:01, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Entertainmentnow (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

68.200.219.47 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Entertainmentnow". The reason given for Entertainmentnow's block is: "repeated removal of speedy deletion templates, including a removal after a fi

Blocking administrator: RL0919 (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Direct block, the correct appeal template is below. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 20:36, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

--- I was simply just trying to edit the article I was working on, and I notices at the top of the page it said that it was spam. I didn't want spam on this article, so I deleted it every time. I continually save my articles and then continue working on the because I don't want my computer to accidentally shut down and have my work deleted. I was just trying to make the article as accurate as possible, because it was already deleted once, and the information on his page is very important to the the growing entertainment industry and balloon idustry because he was published in both the wall street journal and the st pete times.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Entertainmentnow (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here I was simply just trying to edit the article I was working on, and I notices at the top of the page it said that it was spam. I didn't want spam on this article, so I deleted it every time. I continually save my articles and then continue working on the because I don't want my computer to accidentally shut down and have my work deleted. I was just trying to make the article as accurate as possible, because it was already deleted once, and the information on his page is very important to the the growing entertainment industry and balloon idustry because he was published in both the wall street journal and the st pete times.

Decline reason:

While it seems from your appeal that this is largely a misunderstanding, I am declining this appeal for a few reasons. Firstly, the speedy deletion template you were removing has clear instructions on how to properly appeal such a deletion request. It also says that the template should not be removed by the creator of the article, and you received a number of warnings to that effect on this page. Secondly, I believe it would be of great benefit to you to take this time to review some of our policies and guidelines regarding content on Wikipedia, and specifically what content can remain on the site. Articles must demonstrate that their subjects are notable with multiple reliable and verifiable sources, and should be written in a neutral, non-promotional tone. I'd encourage you to review these guidelines for more information on each of these points, and to ask at the Help Desk once unblocked if you still have any questions. You may also use the {{helpme}} template on this page to the same end (it works the same as these unblock templates). Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 20:36, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination of Jonathan Fudge for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jonathan Fudge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Fudge until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mkativerata (talk) 02:45, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Entertainmentnow for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Hairhorn (talk) 15:42, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the links given above. Continued violations of our sockpuppetry policy will result in any other accounts blocked and a possibility of your editing privileges revoked. Elockid ^(Talk) 16:36, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]