User talk:Renameduser

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing at Rick and Bubba. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.--Zpb52 (talk) 23:40, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing at User talk:Renameduser. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.--Zpb52 (talk) 00:43, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Nehrams2020 (talk) 00:45, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--Nehrams2020 (talk) 00:45, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Wikipedia:User page says "Policy does not prohibit users from removing comments from their own talk pages, although archiving is preferred", so the other users had no right to revert your edits to your own page; therefore you did not violate any Wikipedia policy. ugen64 (talk) 02:01, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request handled by: ugen64 (talk) 02:01, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Y	Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Autoblock of 12.208.177.119 lifted or expired. Request handled by: Woody (talk) 02:22, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter that you were only deleting your own posts - continually reverting other users' edits is a violation of one of our policies, the 3 revert rule (you can only make 3 "reverts" during any 24 hour period). In this case, it's kind of confusing when people delete certain posts from a discussion but not others - that's why you were being reverted by other users. ugen64 (talk) 02:50, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you apparently can delete your own user talk page, but not your comments from an article's talk page. Therefore, do not keep deleting your comments from Talk:Rick and Bubba, or you'll subject yourself to another block for violating WP:3RR. --Zpb52 (talk) 03:29, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies

Sorry about reverting your blanking of the talk page. It struck me as slightly odd because it was removing warnings (which I thought was against WP policy). Apologies! Thanks, GlobeGores (talk | contribs) 03:37, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To make this all stop...

If you really want to make this go away, as it seems you want to do...stop deleting your posts. Just let it die.--Zpb52 (talk) 03:46, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the removal of your posts... it might be better if you just removed them flat out, or left a note saying something like Removed post.. Your changes make it seem more that Zpb52 is beating a dead horse, when in actuality he was replying to the original form of your comment before you removed it. GlobeGores (talk | contribs) 04:46, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I replied to you on my talk page. GlobeGores (talk | contribs) 05:17, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Renameduser, consider this...

What would Rick and/or Bubba think of all this? I know Bubba would think it's pretty silly. Just chill out for a little bit while we decide whether or not to split off separate articles about Rick and Bubba. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 04:47, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just curious

Just curious, why are you so intent on removing your comments? I don't mind it, as long as mine stay. That's within your rights as an editor. I don't understand it, because it makes you look bad as an editor, but it is within your rights. --Zpb52 (talk) 13:57, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently your position has changed

Till now your post and actions have been to refuse to let me delete my post. I have not once deleted your post (Unless it was by accident), I was only trying to remove my own. Now you say you don't mind it? If it is within my rights to do so why was there ever an issue. Why did you report me for reverting my deletes if it was within my rights to do so. As far as "looking bad as an editor", if the people that are very knowledgeable about a subject are over ruled by procedure and a laughable "3 person vote" then the whole system is a joke, and I simply want no part of it. If you are an example of how the process works then that makes wiki less encyclopedic and more opinion of those users that know how to work the system. This may be why Wiki is not considered a reliable source by the general public. I now understand and will not bother wiki or zpb again.(Renameduser (talk) 14:17, 23 January 2008 (UTC))[reply]

That's probably for the best. Goodbye. --Zpb52 (talk) 14:20, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- It may the best for me, not having to deal with people of your mentality, but not for other legitimate wiki users. You created this situation by your own apparent lack of wiki knowledge, shown by your reversal on what is within my rights as an editor, yet you have yet to offer an apology or acknowledgement of your error?(Renameduser (talk) 14:30, 23 January 2008 (UTC))[reply]