User talk:DCUnitedFan2011

Welcome! Leave a message

The Block

Request

I would like to get unblocked asap. Crew29 22:33 11, October 2005 (UTC)

Huh?

I'm afraid your request confuses me a little. If you can leave a message on my talk page (which you did), you aren't blocked, right? — Dan | Talk 22:42, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked

I unblocked the two IP addresses used by your old username, so now you should be okay as long as you don't try to edit under your old name (in which case the IP addresses will automatically be blocked again). Regards — Dan | Talk 22:52, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Warm Springs

Hi. Thanks for starting the Warm Springs, Nevada article. I tarted the article up a bit, and left a question at Talk:Warm Springs, Nevada. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 23:46, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

New Users

Fawzi2

I was just wondering what the Columbus Crew do and if you have a purpose? I am new to Wikipedia and I am interested in knowing who you are Fawzi2 23:07, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wizardx

Thanks for the talk page welcome, ColumbusCrew29. It was most informative. :-) Wizardx 21:22, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Moved

I just moved this to the user talk page. IP:64.205.154 23:29, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The Crew's Logo

Who the heck thinks the Columbus Crew have a dumb logo!! Crew29 23:56 22, October 2005 (UTC)

My Other Usernames

If anyone is wondering my other uses names include

they redirect here

ColumbusCrew29 16:54, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re: W-League

Thank you for your project idea and going to finsh the W-League articles!

205.188.116.136 01:31, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your Welcome

Your welcome. :-D ColumbusCrew29 01:43, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Stress Done...For Now

Finnaly I can get back to Wikipedia!

ColumbusCrew29 01:14, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

W-League Done

My first project is done; I am now starting my second project! If you want to now what it is click here!
ColumbusCrew29 23:32, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Another 1?!

I should tell you I made another Wikipedia name but it has my e-mail address included!:-)````

Short articles

Hi! While short articles are welcome, they need to be more than a single, incomplete sentence and an external link. These are generally speedy-deleted for lack of content. Thanks! - Lucky 6.9 21:13, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Breaky McWind

The user Breaky McWind has been prventing me to make an important template. I would like to be unblocked, but delete his username.
-Crew29 01:16, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Crew. You can visit Wikipedia:Changing username in order to reopen the account under a different name. Just go to the "Breaky McWind" talk page for further instructions. - Lucky 6.9 01:41, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Changing Username

I don't think it needs to happen.
Crew29 01:10, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Women's Premier Soccer League

I have heard about you project. I would like to help, becuase I am a huge fan of this league, and I gets now attention go to my talk page to respond :).
SoCCeRfaN3948 01:18, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

R.I.P. Katrina The Gecko

I would like to dedicate this section for the death of my leopard gecko Katrina.:-(
ColumbusCrew29 22:51, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Photo at RFK

Dear CAF,

As you may know there is constant changing on wheter to put the D.C. United photo or the Washington Nationals photo on the top at RFK, I have noticed that you have put the "ballpark" picture up, but it gets changed in a matter of days. I strongly think there should be a vote on this. If you agree, go to my talk page and leave a message. Thank you! ColumbusCrew29 23:31, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Columbus. I don't think it makes any sense to have a vote on this — the baseball picture is clearly the better picture as far as image quality and clarity goes. I don't care whether it's a soccer or a baseball picture at the top, but it should be the best picture, and right now, the Nationals one is obviously superior. If someone wants to contribute a high-quality soccer picture under the GFDL, I'd have no problem at all with it going at the top of the article. —Cleared as filed. 02:00, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: RFK

CAF,

I agree with you on the images (their quality). I was just getting a little annoyed by the constant changing of the top image. Crew29 21:53, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Thanks for your vote

My request for adminship passed with a final result of 78/2/0. Hopefully I will live up to everyone's expectations. Please ask if I can ever help out with anything in the future.
Martyman - 09:15, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikibreak

I must of forgotten about the template!
Crew29 13:30, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There May Be Trouble

I don't think he's big harm but this vandaler "Xenom" is sure showing signs of vandalism.
DCUnitedFan2011 20:54, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reason for wanting to delete Antarctica national football team

I noticed that the article for the Antarctica national football team was put up for deletion. However, it has a link to a non-existant page to discuss the deletion. I would like to know what the reason for deletiong the article is, because I think it would be a good article to keep on Wikipedia. --Willy No1lakersfan (Talk - Contribs) 15:19, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

US Open Cup

Working on US Open Cup articles. DCUnitedFan2011 16:37, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

IFAF

I am alos working on IFAF articles.

USA Football

Working on this too!

For your information, I rewrote the entire article on USA Football. As it clearly says here on http://www.usafootball.com/about-us/overview/ the organization does not operate any leagues or teams, nor it is the governing body of American football throughout the entire United States. Regards. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 23:41, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Other Special Accounts I Made

Piczo, Freewebs, Myspace.

Clifton Patriots

Since my soccer team's page could get easily deleted, I made a page here
DCUnitedFan2011 22:54, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Southwestern Youth Association

DCUnitedFan2011, I proposted this article for deletion. I felt that as described, it sounds like a standard youth sports league, which every town in America has. If it can be expanded or is not a standard youth sports league, please describe further. This is a matter for concensus and therefore it will not automatically be deleted. Please reply to me if you have any questions. Regards, Daysleeper47 13:49, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Nomination: Bus Route 12

An editor has nominated the article Bus Route 12 for deletion, under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the nomination (also see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on why the topic of the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome: participate in the discussion by editing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bus Route 12. Add four tildes like this ~~~~ to sign your comments. You can also edit the article Bus Route 12 during the discussion, but do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top of the article), this will not end the deletion debate. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 17:59, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oregon State Pharmacy Association

Hi there. I saw that you created this article but it doesn't really establish any notability or importance about the subject. As an OSU student myself, I don't like deleting anything related to OSU without a discussion first, but as is this article could probably be speedy deleted. I suggest you make some additional edits to the article to establish notability and/or importance, or the article is likely to be speedy deleted soon. Thanks, VegaDark 23:37, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yellowlime

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DCUnitedFan2011 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

preventing me from helping

Decline reason:

You have not been blocked directly. Please follow the instructions below. - auburnpilot talk 20:18, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am very confused by what is going on on this page. I am just observing CAT:RFU listings. Your talk page is there at this moment. Can you provide an explanation or chronology of your username history? Furthermore, impersonating an administrator could get you in trouble. Since you don't seem to have a history of problematic behavior and I see no warnings (especially last warnings), I would guess that unless you have done something you should sit tight until things clear up. There may be an issue with your usernames and the IP Address you are using. A clear explanation may be helpful, especially if you think you may be at an IP Address that is likely to have been blocked based on other IDs. I am not an admin. I am just trying to be helpful. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 19:37, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clearing an autoblock

Please note that we cannot unblock you at this time because you have not given us the information we need to look into your block. It is very likely that you are not personally blocked. If you are prevented from editing, it may be because you are autoblocked or blocked because of your IP address. Without further details there is nothing further we can do to review your block or lift it. If you are still autoblocked by the time you read this message, please follow these instructions:

If you have a Wikipedia account, please ensure that you are logged in.
Your account name will be visible in the top right of this page if you are.
If it isn't, try bypassing your web browser's cache.
Try to edit the Sandbox.
Copy the {{unblock-auto|...}} code generated for you under the "Autoblocked?" section.
Paste the code at the bottom of your user talk page and click save.

If you are not blocked from editing the sandbox then the autoblock on your IP address has already expired and you can resume editing. - auburnpilot talk 20:18, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please read and follow the instructions above -- you can't generate the {{unblock-auto}} parameters manually, so please don't try to. Instead, try to edit any page other than this talk page, which should get you the "you're blocked" message -- at that point, find the "Autoblocked?" section and copy-paste the code produced for you. It will be tempting to tinker, but please, please, just copy and paste. Thanks. – Luna Santin (talk) 22:12, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

new one

Y	Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Autoblock of 68.98.139.9 lifted or expired. Request handled by: Netsnipe ► 12:50, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Amnokgang Sports Group

Hi, do you have a reference for Amnokgang Sports Group? I can't find anything through Google or Naver. Cheers, -- Visviva 11:24, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rodgrigo Gonzalez

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Rodgrigo Gonzalez, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. King of the North East 16:09, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

S.F. Greek Americans

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article S.F. Greek Americans, because another editor is suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page.

Speedy deletion of Template:User DCUnited

A tag has been placed on Template:User DCUnited requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 22:31, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NTPSA 002

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article NTPSA 002, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of NTPSA 002. BPMullins | Talk 04:54, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia meetup

As someone who may live or work near Washington D.C., you may be interested - if you've not heard already - about the meetup scheduled for Saturday, May 17th, at Union Station. For details, please see Wikipedia:Meetup/DC 4.

You are receiving this automated message because your userpage appears in Category:Wikipedians in Virginia. Melon‑Bot (STOP!) 18:10, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Everton FC America

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Everton FC America, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

A proposed American soccer team that never played a game - non-notable

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Giant Snowman 13:31, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

D.C. Meetup, Saturday, June 6, 2009

The 7th DC Meetup dinner will be held this Saturday, June 6th, starting at 5 p.m. The event will be at Bertucci's, near George Washington University and the Foggy Bottom metro station. It will follow the Apps for Democracy open source event at GWU. For details or to RSVP if you haven't already, see Wikipedia:Meetup/DC 7. (You have received this announcement because your user page indicates that you live in Maryland, Virginia, or DC.)
Delivered by The Helpful Bot at 19:41, 2 June 2009 (UTC) to report errors, please leave a note here. '[reply]

Back

Dang, it's been a while. Hard to believe I made this four years ago. How times flies. DCUnitedFan2011 (talk) 04:47, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

D.C. Meetup, Saturday, September 26

The 8th DC Meetup dinner will be held this Saturday, September 26, starting at 6 p.m. The event will be at Burma Restaurant (740 6th St, NW near the Gallery Place-Chinatown Metro station). For details or to RSVP if you haven't already, see Wikipedia:Meetup/DC 8. (You have received this announcement because your user page indicates that you live in Maryland, Virginia, or DC.) --EdwardsBot (talk) 06:52, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Ashleigh of Clifton, Clifton, Virginia

I have nominated Ashleigh of Clifton, Clifton, Virginia, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashleigh of Clifton, Clifton, Virginia. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SchuminWeb (Talk) 03:42, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dino-Sue

The article Dino-Sue has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Minor exhibit at Disney's Animal Kingdom. Not classified as attraction or listed on park guide maps. Non-notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Uncle Dick (talk) 02:24, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Boneyard Playground

A tag has been placed on The Boneyard Playground, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

It is not very notable, it's just a playground

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Astros4477 (talk) 03:07, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fossil Fun Games

A tag has been placed on Fossil Fun Games, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Not notable.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Astros4477 (talk) 03:08, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fossil Fun Games

The article Fossil Fun Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not very notable. Contains no references.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Astros4477 (talk) 18:32, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Boneyard Playground

The article The Boneyard Playground has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not very notable. Contains no references.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Astros4477 (talk) 18:33, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Black Watch S.C. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Black Watch S.C. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Watch S.C. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. C 679 11:03, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Central Delaware SA Future

The article Central Delaware SA Future has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can find no current coverage or mention. I suspect the team folded several years ago, if it even played at all.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wkharrisjr (talk) 20:45, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Clifton Creek Ridge, Virginia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clifton Creek Ridge, Virginia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clifton Creek Ridge, Virginia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Orlady (talk) 16:37, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Virginia Youth Soccer Association

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Virginia Youth Soccer Association requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Epeefleche (talk) 08:47, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Affection Section

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Affection Section requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.), but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Epeefleche (talk) 08:52, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vancouver Thunderbirds

The article Vancouver Thunderbirds has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not a notable team

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:19, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vancouver Thunderbirds for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vancouver Thunderbirds is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vancouver Thunderbirds until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:00, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of New Mexico Thunder for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New Mexico Thunder is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Mexico Thunder until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vrac (talk) 00:34, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wichita Jets for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wichita Jets is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wichita Jets until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 07:50, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

College soccer task force

Come join Wikiproject Football's College soccer task force on Wikipedia! We will be working to improve quality of content of college soccer-related articles on Wikipedia! You can click here or use the shortcut WP:CSOC! Hope to see you there!! :-) Cobyan02069 (talk) 00:19, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:WPSLsoutheast

Template:WPSLsoutheast has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 16:31, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:USL Premier Development League Great Lakes Division stadiums

Template:USL Premier Development League Great Lakes Division stadiums has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jay eyem (talk) 06:10, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:USL Premier Development League Heartland Division stadiums

Template:USL Premier Development League Heartland Division stadiums has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jay eyem (talk) 06:11, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:USL Premier Development League Mid Atlantic Division stadiums

Template:USL Premier Development League Mid Atlantic Division stadiums has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jay eyem (talk) 06:11, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:USL Premier Development League Mid South Division stadiums

Template:USL Premier Development League Mid South Division stadiums has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jay eyem (talk) 06:11, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:USL Premier Development League Southeast Division stadiums

Template:USL Premier Development League Southeast Division stadiums has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jay eyem (talk) 06:12, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sports Network (arena)

The article Sports Network (arena) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to be non-notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Edward Mordake (talk) 15:47, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of National Professional Paintball League

The article National Professional Paintball League has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable league without sufficient depth of coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 14:34, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of National Professional Paintball League for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article National Professional Paintball League is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Professional Paintball League until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 04:44, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Florida Ridge Hills

The article Florida Ridge Hills has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established with substantive sources, all Google results are Wikipedia mirrors, so WP:V is an issue here.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92^Talk 01:11, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Miami Surf

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Miami Surf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, society, or group that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. SITH (talk) 12:20, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:RhodesFootball2007

Template:RhodesFootball2007 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. S.A. Julio (talk) 05:58, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Colchester Hunt, Virginia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Colchester Hunt, Virginia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colchester Hunt, Virginia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Waddles 🗩 🖉 01:48, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]