User talk:Rutebega

Archives

artificial intelligence

note that i posted this text on the artificial intelignece tlak page as well.

ok i will state my original rationale in creating this section as well as the subsections.

first a bit of background: as you may know AI programs are different in many ways from conventional programs in the sense that thay are networks. as such thay are Massively parallel and have certain computational requirements on software as well as hardware level in order to perform their intended function. much research has been dedicated to find suitable hardware for this perpose. and the amount of opinions on that research even more so.

as of the time of this writing, (Thursday, June 11, 2020) thare are 3 main approaches to hardware designed for ai reaserch and application

1) conventional hardware von Neumann architecture specifically graphics processing units. if you look at the Wikipedia article: AI accelerator under the section "history of ai acceleration" it covers the topic quite well. 2)memristors (and yes, i know the use of memristors in AI is controversial but that shouldn't be a reason to leave it out ?) 3)neuromorphic hardware: (see the wikipedia article Neuromorphic engineering) like the one's Brainchip Inc and intel are currently manufacturing. it should be noted that neuromorphic computing is recognized as an essential technology for the future of AI so much so that the human brain project(https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Human_Brain_Project) has an entire research section dedicated to it. see the wikipedia articles spinnaker and brainsclaes

my intention was to take this specific aspect of AI (hardware) and include it in the general article of AI. the subsections represent the aspects of the specific topic as explained above.

update 1:59pm same day : it seems that the hardware section i wrote has been deleated in its place a sub-subsection titled "hardware imrpovments" under subsection evaluating progress. the paragraph written dosent mention enuromorphic or other alternative computing arcitectures in any way. also why cant it just be a section on its own? its noteworthy enough

-RJJ4y7 — Preceding unsigned comment added by RJJ4y7 (talk • contribs) 14:51, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

LF Top Songs

LF Top Songs - popular project official pages https://posts.google.com/share/ZazhHI6x, please do not delete ~~ 1hitsmusic —Preceding undated comment added 20:00, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

1hitsmusic (talk · contribs), please join the deletion discussion to explain why it should not be deleted. Do not remove the deletion template as you have here. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing. If you have questions, see our Guide to Deletion or ask me here. This essay may also help. Thank you. —Rutebega (talk) 20:14, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page LF Top Songs cannot be deleted because it represents the official music brand. ~~ 1hitsmusic —Preceding undated comment added 20:24, 6 July 2019 (UTC) I guess this is how I am supposed to contact people on the site? Well I removed content I found blatantly unreasonable or terribly bias. I did not find it offensive as much as intellectually dishonest. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheRedTomahawk (talk • contribs) 01:00, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Rutebega,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikipedia and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 16:29, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

can i be administrator

Can i be admin Thoriso Kaekae (talk) 08:14, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Content removal

Hi Rutebega. I removed the listing for the "Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency" under "The Reagan Cabinet" because it was not given cabinet ranking under the Presidency of Ronald Reagan. It wasn't given cabinet ranking until 1993, during the Presidency of Bill Clinton. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.2.40.212 (talk) 01:11, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@99.2.40.212: Ah, that would make sense. That information would be useful to have on the US Cabinet or EPA Administrator pages, but alas, wikipedia is not finished. I've reinstated the changes I reverted. Certain kinds of edits it really helps to leave an edit summary so nobody thinks you're just deleting willy-nilly, especially since you'll receive a lot more scrutiny as an IP user. I appreciate you setting me straight; keep up the good work. —Rutebega (talk) 22:11, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Having an issue uploading a new version of an image

I'm trying to upload a clearer version of File:Darkseid Final Crisis Vol 1 6 Variant.png, but I'm only able to see the older version appear.--Teridax122 (talk) 17:42, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Teridax122, sorry for the delayed response; I think it was just that you were reverted/your newer version was deleted. The Darkseid image you're working on is copyrighted, so it has to comply with Wikipedia's policy on non-free content. Normally, uploading a higher resolution would be welcomed, but with non-free images, it's often required that they only be detailed enough for the needs of the article(s), usually just to identify whatever is pictured. Let me know if you have any more questions. —Rutebega (talk) 16:04, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A survey to improve the community consultation outreach process

Hello!

The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate in a recent consultation that followed a community discussion you’ve been part of.

Please fill out this short survey to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.

The privacy policy for this survey is here. This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.

Thank you for your participation, Kbrown (WMF) 10:45, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Earl Thomas Conley discography

the album is not called don't make it easy for me it's called don't make it easy Wweman3853 (talk) 03:34, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Wweman3853 Do you have a reliable source? —Rutebega (talk) 03:37, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes here it is https://music.amazon.com/albums/B015J9F6A0 Wweman3853 (talk) 03:45, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Wweman3853 I question whether amazon.com is truly a reliable source, especially if it directly contradicts billboard, but you are welcome to bring it up on the talk page. —Rutebega (talk) 03:58, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Hartheim killing centre, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The *Show preview* button is right next to the *Publish changes* button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 03:28, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Hello Rutebega, I was wondering if you could please take a quick second to change your signature to [[User:Rutebega|Rutebega]] ([[User talk:Rutebega|talk]])? Your current signature uses ... tags, which create obsolete HTML lint errors. The new signature will look exactly like your old one. Thank you so much! House Blaster^talk 17:49, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks for the heads up, I wouldn't have known! —Rutebega (talk) 18:01, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about it! If we needed to know everything about this place before editing, I don't think we would have any editors left! Best, House Blaster^talk 19:52, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]