User talk:Conquistador2k6/archive 15

Nomination of Recurring characters of Home and Away for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Recurring characters of Home and Away is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Recurring characters of Home and Away until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ajf773 (talk) 08:48, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot to let you know that I got a copy of this article moved to my userpace. I'm either going to try and source the whole thing or work out a way to merge it with the past list. Also, can you help me figure out who Neighbours character Hennessy (Gregory Costaras) is? I know he's something to do with Darren Stark, but I think his list entry is going to need more than "Darren's associate". - JuneGloom07 Talk 23:14, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Coronation Street characters (2011), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daily Star (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:45, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Malcolm Kennedy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alan Fletcher (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sections

I just noticed your edit to Gemma Ramsay adding several sections. I just do not think there is enough information for those sections at present. Would it be okay to lay off splitting the development section for now?Rain the 1 14:20, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I had thought about splitting them. The departure information is really blended with information on her relationship with Adam, so it was difficult. We need something more to add.Rain the 1 22:01, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Natalie Evans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:29, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Neighbours characters (1990), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Josh Anderson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:17, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

1992 Neighbours characters

Hey. So, I noticed you had started a draft for the Neighbours 1992 character list and were planning on moving Benito Alessi there when it was done, which didn't feel quite right to me. We should be keeping as many character articles as possible, and I knew I hadn't added everything from the Spartels interview, so I had a go at expanding it. I think it passes WP:GNG now and there's always potential for more sources to turn up. I also wanted to let you know that I have plans for a Cameron Hudson article. He was always a character I was interested in moving out of the Willis family list. If I can't find enough info though, will it be okay to move what I do have to your draft? - JuneGloom07 Talk 15:47, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

Hi Conquistador2k6! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia — it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. —J. M. (talk) 19:37, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Charlotte Day

The article Charlotte Day has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced fancruft.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 01:06, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop marking major edits as minor

Hello again. Please stop marking your edits as minor. A minor edit is just a correction, formatting change, wikilink, template or vandalism revert. Any content you add to an article—a single word, sentence, paragraph or anything else—is a major edit. Marking major edits as minor is a breach of etiquette on Wikipedia, so please stop doing it. Thank you.—J. M. (talk) 01:30, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nicholas Colla

The article Nicholas Colla has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

No independent reliable sources, and I can't find any either.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. – Fayenatic London 20:34, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]