User talk:Citrivescence/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Citrivescence. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Disambiguation link notification for October 6
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Read with Kid Fury and Crissle West, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fuse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:24, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Binge Mode podcast poster.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Binge Mode podcast poster.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
Ways to improve Catherine Cohen
Hello, Citrivescence,
Thank you for creating Catherine Cohen.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Thank you for developing the new article on Catherine Cohen.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 13:19, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
November 2019 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:57, 29 October 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
New Page Review newsletter November 2019
Hello Citrivescence,
This newsletter comes a little earlier than usual because the backlog is rising again and the holidays are coming very soon.
- Getting the queue to 0
There are now 805 holders of the New Page Reviewer flag! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog but it's still roughly less than 10% doing 90% of the work. Now it's time for action.
Exactly one year ago there were 'only' 3,650 unreviewed articles, now we will soon be approaching 7,000 despite the growing number of requests for the NPR user right. If each reviewer soon does only 2 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by every reviewer doing only 1 review every 2 days - that's only a few minutes work on the bus on the way to the office or to class! Let's get this over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.
Want to join? Consider adding the NPP Pledge userbox.
Our next newsletter will announce the winners of some really cool awards.
- Coordinator
Admin Barkeep49 has been officially invested as NPP/NPR coordinator by a unanimous consensus of the community. This is a complex role and he will need all the help he can get from other experienced reviewers.
- This month's refresher course
Paid editing is still causing headaches for even our most experienced reviewers: This official Wikipedia article will be an eye-opener to anyone who joined Wikipedia or obtained the NPR right since 2015. See The Hallmarks to know exactly what to look for and take time to examine all the sources.
- Tools
- It is now possible to select new pages by date range. This was requested by reviewers who want to patrol from the middle of the list.
- It is now also possible for accredited reviewers to put any article back into the New Pages Feed for re-review. The link is under 'Tools' in the side bar.
- Reviewer Feedback
Would you like feedback on your reviews? Are you an experienced reviewer who can give feedback to other reviewers? If so there are two new feedback pilot programs. New Reviewer mentorship will match newer reviewers with an experienced reviewer with a new reviewer. The other program will be an occasional peer review cohort for moderate or experienced reviewers to give feedback to each other. The first cohort will launch November 13.
- Second set of eyes
- Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work, especially while some routine tagging for deletion can still be carried out by non NPR holders and inexperienced users. Read about it at the Monitoring the system section in the tutorial. If you come across such editors doing good work, don't hesitate to encourage them to apply for NPR.
- Do be sure to have our talk page on your watchlist. There are often items that require reviewers' special attention, such as to watch out for pages by known socks or disruptive editors, technical issues and new developments, and of course to provide advice for other reviewers.
- Arbitration Committee
The annual ArbCom election will be coming up soon. All eligible users will be invited to vote. While not directly concerned with NPR, Arbcom cases often lead back to notability and deletion issues and/or actions by holders of advanced user rights.
- Community Wish list
There is to be no wish list for WMF encyclopedias this year. We thank Community Tech for their hard work addressing our long list of requirements which somewhat overwhelmed them last year, and we look forward to a successful completion.
To opt-out of future mailings, you can remove yourself here
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
December events with WIR
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:42, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Gambo
You previously participated in Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Gambo and mentioned sources in a different language than English. The article is back at AFD again at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gambo (carcass). If there are reliable sources, please link to them and say what they are. Dream Focus 10:46, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Emily Rosaline Orme
Hello this article is now enhanced somewhat, but the invisible link to draftspace remains, and seems to interfere with the visual editing ( or it could be my errors as a relatively new user) would you be willing to remove this draftspace link now? Thanks in anticipation Kaybeesquared (talk) 22:26, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Kaybeesquared: Hi, you should be able to go ahead and remove those lines of code yourself. Click edit on the page, then click the "source editing" option next to the pen icon in the top right corner. Remove the code there above the infobox text and it should get rid of the link. Please let me know if you run into any problems with that. Thanks! Citrivescence (talk) 20:15, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Citrivescence: Thanks that seems to have worked when REMOVE button didn't - thanks for the help!
Kaybeesquared (talk) 20:57, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
New Page Review newsletter December 2019
- Reviewer of the Year
This year's Reviewer of the Year is Rosguill. Having gotten the reviewer PERM in August 2018, they have been a regular reviewer of articles and redirects, been an active participant in the NPP community, and has been the driving force for the emerging NPP Source Guide that will help reviewers better evaluate sourcing and notability in many countries for which it has historically been difficult.
Special commendation again goes to Onel5969 who ends the year as one of our most prolific reviewers for the second consecutive year. Thanks also to Boleyn and JTtheOG who have been in the top 5 for the last two years as well.
Several newer editors have done a lot of work with CAPTAIN MEDUSA and DannyS712 (who has also written bots which have patrolled thousands of redirects) being new reviewers since this time last year.
Thanks to them and to everyone reading this who has participated in New Page Patrol this year.
| Rank | Username | Num reviews | Log |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rosguill (talk) | 47,395 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 2 | Onel5969 (talk) | 41,883 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 3 | JTtheOG (talk) | 11,493 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 4 | Arthistorian1977 (talk) | 5,562 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 5 | DannyS712 (talk) | 4,866 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 6 | CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk) | 3,995 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 7 | DragonflySixtyseven (talk) | 3,812 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 8 | Boleyn (talk) | 3,655 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 9 | Ymblanter (talk) | 3,553 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 10 | Cwmhiraeth (talk) | 3,522 | Patrol Page Curation |
(The top 100 reviewers of the year can be found here)
- Redirect autopatrol
A recent Request for Comment on creating a new redirect autopatrol pseduo-permission was closed early. New Page Reviewers are now able to nominate editors who have an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects. At the individual discretion of any administrator or after 24 hours and a consensus of at least 3 New Page Reviewers an editor may be added to a list of users whose redirects will be patrolled automatically by DannyS712 bot III.
- Source Guide Discussion
Set to launch early in the new year is our first New Page Patrol Source Guide discussion. These discussions are designed to solicit input on sources in places and topic areas that might otherwise be harder for reviewers to evaluate. The hope is that this will allow us to improve the accuracy of our patrols for articles using these sources (and/or give us places to perform a WP:BEFORE prior to nominating for deletion). Please watch the New Page Patrol talk page for more information.
- This month's refresher course
While New Page Reviewers are an experienced set of editors, we all benefit from an occasional review. This month consider refreshing yourself on Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features). Also consider how we can take the time for quality in this area. For instance, sources to verify human settlements, which are presumed notable, can often be found in seconds. This lets us avoid the (ugly) 'Needs more refs' tag.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:10, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
January 2020 at Women in Red
|
Seasons greetings from Australia!
.jpg)
Hello Citrivescence: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, RebeccaGreen (talk) 13:37, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
.jpg)
(Adapted from Template:Season's Greetings1)
- @RebeccaGreen: Thanks so much! Happy New Year from the States. :) Citrivescence (talk) 22:16, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
A brownie for you!
|
For creating Election Night (Veep). Keep up the good work! Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 08:26, 4 January 2020 (UTC) |
- @CaptainEek: I appreciate this! It's my first Wiki brownie (and it's making me hungry...)! Citrivescence (talk) 22:17, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
February with Women in Red
.jpg)
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for February 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Read with Kid Fury and Crissle West, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chika (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:17, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
New Page Reviewer newsletter February 2020
Hello Citrivescence,
- Source Guide Discussion
The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.
- Redirects
New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.
- Discussions and Resources
- There is an ongoing discussion around changing notifications for new editors who attempt to write articles.
- A recent discussion of whether Michelin starred restraunts are notable was archived without closure.
- A resource page with links pertinent for reviewers was created this month.
- A proposal to increase the scope of G5 was withdrawn.
- Refresher
Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
March 2020
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. CapnZapp (talk) 09:57, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
If you have any objections to the article, detail them at its talk page so they can be addressed. CapnZapp (talk) 10:19, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Be civil
You posted a message on my talk page saying Welcome to Wikipedia!
even though you know I am an established user not new to Wikipedia at all.
Please don't talk down to your fellow editors. Don't use boilerplate templates inappropriate for the recipient you're addressing. CapnZapp (talk) 08:51, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- @CapnZapp: That message runs automatically through a script on the page curation toolbar. I never talk down to my fellow editors. Citrivescence (talk) 02:59, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
April 2020 at Women in Red
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:58, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for March 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Front Cover, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Chen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Camryn Garrett for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Camryn Garrett is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camryn Garrett until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 05:35, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
AfD
Hi, I recommended the proposed deletion of There's No Business... (1994 film).
I randomly clicked on one or two of the articles you created, and coincidentally we have both written articles about editors of Harvard Lampoon: you with Alexis Wilkinson, and I with Harold Everett Porter, but he's just another dead white guy. Rainbow greetings, MinorProphet (talk) 01:35, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- @MinorProphet and MinorProphet: Haha, that's so funny! Thank you for saying hello, and rainbow greetings to you as well! Citrivescence (talk) 22:14, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Please don't use exclamation marks all the time. It makes you come across as someone who is permanently surprised. And when something really unusual happens, how will you describe it? Maybe it just went
BANG!
MinorProphet (talk) 03:42, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- @MinorProphet: I don't appreciate this response as it is condescending and off-putting. Please don't leave me any more messages like this.Citrivescence (talk) 04:34, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
May 2020 at Women in Red
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 20:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Scottie Beam Article
Hello Citricescence!
First and foremost, I want to compliment you for creating several pages of prominent figures in Black culture. You did an amazing job on the Scottie Beam article! I added a piece at the end regarding her new podcast announcement with Netflix and Strong Black Lead.
I'm curious to know what your process is with moving articles from a draft into the mainspace. I've had so many issues with this in the past and would love some insight.
Thank you in advance!
Mary Wollstonecraft Award
.jpg)
|
Mary Wollstonecraft Award | |
| On behalf of WP:WPWW, thank you for creating the recent new article on Camonghne Felix, who in 2015, was appointed as Governor Andrew Cuomo's speechwriter, and was the first African-American woman to serve in the role. --Rosiestep (talk) 18:45, 1 May 2020 (UTC) |
- @Rosiestep: What an honor. Thank you so much! Citrivescence (talk) 20:56, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Citrivescence
Thank you for creating Testimony (Veep).
User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Nice work!
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 11:28, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
June 2020 at Women in Red
June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 17:10, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
New Page Reviewer newsletter June 2020
Hello Citrivescence,
- Your help can make a difference
NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.
- Google Adds New Languages to Google Translate
In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.
- Discussions and Resources
- A discussion on handling new article creation by paid editors is ongoing at the Village Pump.
- Also at the Village Pump is a discussion about limiting participation at Articles for Deletion discussion.
- A proposed new speedy deletion criteria for certain kinds of redirects ended with no consensus.
- Also ending with no change was a proposal to change how we handle certain kinds of vector images.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Please edit pages per Wikipedia guidelines and policies
Template:Refname rules: "Names should have semantic value, so that they can be more easily distinguished from each other by human editors who are looking at the wikitext. This means that ref names like "Nguyen 2010" are preferred to names like ":1"." I can understand not being aware of refname rules. But after it's brought to your attention, using :0, :1, :2, etc., refnames again (e.g. Nneka Onuorah bio) is either stubbornness or carelessness. Pyxis Solitary (yak). L not Q. 17:41, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Pyxis Solitary: I am neither careless nor stubborn and don't appreciate being called either. This is far from good faith and is very insulting. This is a direct request for you to not call me any more names or suggest that I don't know what I'm doing. Also, the example where it was "brought to my attention" is truly baffling. Why would you assume I had seen that? You chose to call me names instead of calmly bringing it to my attention?--Citrivescence (talk) 22:48, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- "
Why would you assume I had seen that?
" — because you created the 195 Lewis article and, therefore, it's on your watchlist. But if you're not looking at article edit summaries, then it makes sense that you didn't see my summary. So if you don't, then I apologize for thinking the reason you ignore refname rules is due to "stubbornness or carelessness". Pyxis Solitary (yak). L not Q. 01:35, 27 June 2020 (UTC)- @Pyxis Solitary: That rule you cite says that custom refnames are "preferred" not "required". I use the visual text editor to autocreate citations and will continue to do so. Also, your failure to acknowledge that speaking to me this way is in fact, disrespectful, and not in good faith tells me what I need to know about you. I have to say, I've experienced this inexplicable nastiness more than I care to on Wiki, but for it to come from someone from the same Wikiproject as me is just disappointing.--Citrivescence (talk) 04:40, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry that you saw my reply as you do. Just so you know, using VisualEditor is easy, but VE is incompatible for many edits. As for "
That rule you cite says that custom refnames are "preferred" not "required". I use the visual text editor to autocreate citations and will continue to do so.
" -- that tells me a lot more. Too bad. Pyxis Solitary (yak). L not Q. 04:49, 27 June 2020 (UTC)- "Sorry that you saw my reply as you do." Okay, got it. At this point, I don't see any reason for future contact. --Citrivescence (talk) 04:54, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry that you saw my reply as you do. Just so you know, using VisualEditor is easy, but VE is incompatible for many edits. As for "
- @Pyxis Solitary: That rule you cite says that custom refnames are "preferred" not "required". I use the visual text editor to autocreate citations and will continue to do so. Also, your failure to acknowledge that speaking to me this way is in fact, disrespectful, and not in good faith tells me what I need to know about you. I have to say, I've experienced this inexplicable nastiness more than I care to on Wiki, but for it to come from someone from the same Wikiproject as me is just disappointing.--Citrivescence (talk) 04:40, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
- "
July 2020 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:10, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Orphaned non-free image File:The Haunting of Lin-Manuel Miranda official poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Haunting of Lin-Manuel Miranda official poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:54, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:I May Destroy You tv.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:I May Destroy You tv.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:00, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
August 2020 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:50, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Awards "snubs" section on Pose (TV series)
Hi there, Citrivescence! I began a discussion on the Pose (TV series) talk page about your inclusion of the awards "snubs" section. I believed it contained novel syntheses, therefore, I have removed it from the article for now but would love to continue discussing its inclusion. I also noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Help:Minor edit has all of this information if you'd like a further read. Cheers! KyleJoantalk 02:15, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Citrivescence
Thank you for creating Chapter One: Make Your Mark.
User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Nice work!
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 01:39, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Citrivescence
Thank you for creating Dime Davis.
User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good start
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 01:22, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Citrivescence
Thank you for creating Antonia Hylton.
User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good start
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 14:34, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
September Women in Red edithons
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:54, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for September 13
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jenn White, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1A.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
October editathons from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Thanks for joining our Latinx heritage edit-a-thon
Hi Citrivescence!
Just wanted to say thanks for signing on to the Latinx heritage edit-a-thon we've been hosting via the Libraries at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. So glad to have you editing with us!
--Sodapopinski7 (talk) 08:09, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Sodapopinski7: Sure, thank you for organizing it! I'm planning to develop a couple of articles in the next few days. (Also, I noticed my unrelated edits are showing up in the tally of Articles Edited. Not sure why that's happening.) ---Citrivescence (talk) 01:03, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Citrivescence: I'm not 100% sure, but I think the dashboard just counts all the edits made by each enrolled editor during the timespan specified in the program. And since ours had a timespan of a couple weeks, it just kept counting! ----Sodapopinski7 (talk) 02:18, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Miss Juneteenth
Per WP:CATV, categorization must be verifiable and we should avoid it "if the article gives no clear indication for inclusion in a category". Granted, you have shown the category is indicated in the sources, make sure that the article also says that information. BOVINEBOY2008 21:31, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
- Also doing a bit more digging, it appears that this is People's first FEATURE film, but not her first film she directed. See this tweet thread where it says "Previous to "Miss Juneteenth," Peoples directed Carry Me Home (2009), a documentary short; and two other short films, Red (2013) and Doretha's Blues (2019)." BOVINEBOY2008 21:35, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Bovineboy2008: To your first comment, I did in fact have a sentence that said it was her debut in the body of the article. I got the information from the Variety article that used the word "directorial debut" in the title. As for your second comment, I assume you went looking on her IMDb page, or somewhere, to find this other film. I stick to reliable sources when writing and citing my articles. --Citrivescence (talk) 00:50, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
SPI
|
This quick case is open. |
- Sinlu22 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
November edit-a-thons from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:00, 11 November 2020 (UTC)