User talk:Alice Purcell
Snapshot isolation (bias?)
[edit]Is it necessary to list some of the RDMS that implement Snapshot isolation? It's a horribly incomplete list, for example MS Sql Server implements it. Having an incomplete list looks like a bias to me. --Blowdart 18:23, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
That's just incomplete knowledge on my part. Please do add more. Taking it out may create the false impression that SI is only a theoretical tool, and not of practical use.
I took the list from Multiversion concurrency control, removing MySQL as I don't know whether the InnoDB engine implements only SI or is truly serializable. Should SQL Server be added there, too? --Chris Purcell 18:29, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Oh heavens yes, SQL Server has had snapshot isolution since at least 6.5 :) This does bring the argument around listing software like this, as missing software out may give a false impression (?) --Blowdart 18:31, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
- No, I don't think that's right. SQL Server had something that it called snapshot isolation in 6.5, but it wasn't actual snapshot isolation! To my knowledge it didn't get real snapshots until it got MCC in 2005. I don't recall the particulars, but ISTR that if you deleted a record from another transaction it would disappear inside the "snapshot." --Craig Stuntz 19:37, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Ah yes, I see the list in Multiversion concurrency control. I've added Microsoft Sql Server to it, and the Snapshot isolation page. MS Sql Server did only get MCC in 2005 though. --Blowdart 18:36, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Technically, Axion should be on the list, too. However, I don't see a WP page for it. I think "such as" should be an indication to the enterprising reader that a list does not aim for completeness ;) --Chris Purcell 18:40, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
I object to being labelled as not enterprising :p --Blowdart 18:43, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Heheh :) Thanks for the peer review. Pretty fast, too! I'd barely had time to reload the page before you commented... --Chris Purcell 18:44, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Wikiproject Computer science
[edit]Hi Chris, and welcome to WikiProject Computer science! Glad to have someone else with an interest in concurrency onboard (although my own interests lie more in the area of process algebras than lock-free data structures). --Allan McInnes (talk) 16:36, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
Integrated banner for WikiProject Computer science
[edit]I have made a proposal for a integrated banner for the project here . I invite you for your valuable comments in the discussion. You are receiving this note as you are a member of the project. Thanks -- Tinu Cherian - 09:49, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Chris Purcell. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Chris Purcell. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Both Tonelli-Shanks and Cipolla's modular square root algorithms can handle powers of prime modula (not just primes)
[edit]I looked up Dickson's History of Numbers vol 1 p215(Tonelli) and p218(Cipolla) and Dickson clearly shows that both modular square root algorithms can handle powers of prime modula (whereas the Wiki articles say they can only do prime modula).
I've updated the TALK pages of both articles with the relevant Dickson math, along with numeric runthroughs with Mathematica code.
However, I am not a professional mathematician so I hesitate to update the articles.
Perhaps yourself, or someone else in the Computer science field could update the relevant articles with this information from Dickson.
The articles in question are:
Endo999 (talk) 20:18, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Alice Purcell. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Alice Purcell. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)