User talk:TerminalPreppie

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.

Archives

Linus Omark

The Oilogosphere is the most active hockey blog community on the Internet. When someone posts something in reference to a player named "Youtube", the player they are talking about is Linus Omark. Just like Dustin Penner is the Flying Fridge. I pointed to a blog on the Oilogosphere that demonstrated the use of this nickname, so I don't know why you declared that to be insufficient proof of his nickname. Or are you saying that Youtube isn't his nickname? Genius McSmarts (talk) 20:44, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

see reply at your talk page. TerminalPreppie (talk) 21:06, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

lauren o'connell

i moved the page for lauren o'connell back to my user space so i can fix it and it won't be deleted... thanks for letting me know that i need to fix the references... it's my first article so i wasn't sure on what i needed... hopefully i get it right this time... sorry if this is in the wrong place... still a little new to wikipedia... if it is i'm sure you'll delete this after you read it... thanks again Max bemis is pretty cool (talk) 22:42, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BIA

Okay, sorry, I'm new to Wikipedia, and I didn't understand that you're in Pennsylvania.

I'll do my homework and learn more about how it works.

BIA means 'Business Improvement Area' - it's an unholy alliance of local businesses and politicians common in Ottawa.

It seems weird that I have to convince YOU that my community link is legitimate, but I can see why it's necessary.

So I'll get to work on that.

Thanks and have a nice day, Craig — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ottawaowl2 (talk • contribs) 15:55, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

open and shut case

Yes, it certainly appears that way. But such is not the case.

Thanks for info. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ottawaowl2 (talk • contribs) 20:25, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Error in Template:Infobox NHL Draft

The error seems to be in the last line of the template which creates the link to the following year:

{{#ifeq:{{{year}}}|{{CURRENTYEAR}}| |'''[[{{#expr:{{{year|{{CURRENTYEAR}}}}}+1}} {{#ifexpr:{{{year|{{CURRENTYEAR}}}}} > 1948|NHL|BAA}} Entry Draft|{{#expr:{{{year|{{CURRENTYEAR}}}}}+1}} > ]]'''}}

It looks wrong at the first place, because the default behavior should be to generate the link to the following year, not to do nothing. It should be replaced by some expressing using {{#ifexist: page title | value if exists | value if doesn't exist }} as a base. --Soccer-holic^{I hear voices in my head...} 22:27, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. ^^ --Soccer-holic^{I hear voices in my head...} 22:33, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Suspended NHL players

At the time, I did not know suspended NHL players were still active; I was following the NFL when their players are suspended they can be replaced on the active roster. There was no way to include their suspended status on the roster itself (like the injury status) so I just hid them. But you be assured that if another editor had reverted those players, it would have remain unchange (especially after I saw the Devils & Islanders' gameday rosters). Thanks1 Raul17 (talk) 00:13, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

lauren o'connell

hello... trying to work out how my article doesn't meet wp:music... i know that city newspaper is a weekly publication localized to northwestern new york state but it's notable enough to be included in wikipedia so i though that it was good enough to use as a source... the other sources are national... the article in the atlantic refers to her collaboration with nataly dawn and does mention her in the first paragraph... since dawn is a notable musician associated with a notable band according to wikipedia i thought that was good enough to use as a source... filter magazine is a noted national music magazine published quarterly... the word is a well established music magazine in the uk... noisenoisenoise is an online music magazine from the uk... as far as i can tell all are reliable sources... i believe she meets criteria for a major music competition as she placed in the top finalists in the 2010 newsong contest which is a major national songwriting and performance competition for independent artists in america and canada... and she was mentioned in press releases made by the contest sponsor newsong recordings which is an established independent label as well as press release by the venue where the contest was held and one by broadcast music inc which is a well known and respected music representation firm... since none of them are reprints or advertising but original press releases that have no self promotion by her or any of the musicians featured in them i thought that they were acceptable... i also sourced an international contest held by musician am that she won... i'm fairly certain that it doesn't count as a major competition but he is another notable musician according to wikipedia so again i thought that it would be acceptable... the other sources are partially youtube videos that i used to reference instrumentation and musical style as well as a video interview... i thought that with all of the other references these would be ok to use... if i'm not mistaken you marked the article for deletion the first time before i moved it to my user page to fix it... since you seem to know more about this than me how can i keep my article from being considered for deletion... i've read the music notability page and it appears to me that she meets the criteria if only for the newsong contest... i've seen articles that have way less notability that haven't been deleted or even considered for deletion so i'm confused about this... if you could please let me know how to fix this or who i need to talk to i'd really appreciate it Max bemis is pretty cool (talk) 17:39, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Carter Hutton

The article Carter Hutton has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The subject of this article does not appear to meet the general notability guideline or the WP:NHOCKEY guideline for ice hockey players. I am unable to find significant coverage of this person in third party sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onthegogo (talk) 14:45, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AfD of Michael Chaput speedily closed

I closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Chaput in accordance with WP:NAC on the grounds that it was opened in the wrong forum. Deletion discussions for redirect pages are done at Redirects for discussion.

In the interest of full disclosure, I discovered after closing the AfD that I contested a prod on this page on 19 February 2011 on the grounds that notability guidelines do not apply to redirect pages. Per WP:R it is perfectly acceptable to have a redirect page from a person or subject that does not meet notability guidelines to a related person or subject that does meet notability guidelines. For this reason I will not procedurally list this at RfD as I ordinarily do when I come across deletion discussions in the wrong forum. If you still believe this redirect should be deleted you may list it at WP:RFD, but please read WP:RFD#DELETE before doing so. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 16:53, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: 2013 NHL Entry Draft

Yup, User:Soccer-holic/Draft picks. We've got a pair of third-round picks having changed teams so far, plus two-and-a-half conditional picks. --Soccer-holic^{I hear voices in my head...} 17:23, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Zigi Palffy and other Slovak personalities

Hello, thank you for your opinion in the article about Zigmund Palffy. But pushing fake origin from obscure sources is not only case of Zigmund Palffy. Hungarian sources usualy mark as Hungarian all persons with Hungarian surname, but these people are often from Slovak families with Slovak ancestors. For example ice-hockey player Ladislav Nagy is from Saca (only 60 hungarians in town and 4300 slovaks), his family is Slovak, just his surname is Hungarian. Similary disputes are in articles about Balázs Borbély, Krisztián Németh (Slovak footballer), Attila Szabó (Slovak canoer), Péter Molnár (footballer). Similary disputes about Slovak politicians of Hungarian origin: [1], [2], [3]. It also affect the Slovak historical personalities. On the other hand if we have a people from present day Slovakia with 100% Slovak ethnicity than Hungarian editors delete it, for example Alajos Szokolyi or Tamás Priskin, who gained Hungarian citizenship only in 2005. Result is, that here is just a few Slovakian editors, and planty of Hungarian editors whose spetialization are such disputes. The have a double measure. On the one hand, for them are all persons from historical Hungarian Kingdom (present day Hungary, Slovakia, Serbia, Romania and Croatia) Hungarians. On the other hand each person from Slovakia, Romania, Serbia and Croatia with Hungarian surnames are Hungarians. This situation is here from 2008, when started economical crisis in Hungary and rise of nationalism. Slovaks are here in small minority, coz history and ethnic disputes (often fakeing) is probably national sport in Hungary. Its not such country that about 10-20 editors are specialized to find Hungarian ancestors of Slovaks, changeing Slovak geographical names to Hungarian. They often contact admins if Slovak editors has an different opinion [4] and canvassing. Now almost all Slovak editors are banned or topic banned. Its good future for Wikipedia if 10-20 editors has a monopol for Point of View and neutrality is forgotten. --Samofi (talk) 08:19, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 6

Hi. When you recently edited 2011–12 Philadelphia Flyers season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WHL (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RHEL Desktop

Hi! What's the name of this wallpaper? TIA --129.143.161.27 (talk) 17:15, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Found - the dawn/day/dusk/night series ... --78.53.212.255 (talk) 18:36, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Traded picks for 2014 NHL Entry Draft and beyond

Aside from the SJS-DET conditional pick, there were no other trades involving 2014 picks yet. As usual, if the odd trade of such pick(s) happens, feel free to add it to User:Soccer-holic/Draft picks until there is enough stuff for a new article. Cheers, Soccer-holic^{I hear voices in my head...} 18:07, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, TerminalPreppie. You have new messages at User:Hazard-Bot/Requests.
Message added 23:17, 20 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hazard-SJ ✈ 23:17, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion

You proposed that Peter Stoykewych be deleted, but you failed to give a reason why. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:16, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Bobrovsky trade

Thanks for the heads-up. Deadman137 (talk · contribs) already did the necessary work, so I had just to clean up a little.

As a sidenote – in contrast to previous years, I will not be able to contribute "live" tonight (a radically changed sleeping pattern is to blame) and thus will focus on clean up work instead. Enjoy the draft tonight! Cheers, Soccer-holic^{I hear voices in my head...} 18:15, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Stoykewych

I just wanted to move this off of the ice hockey project and to your talk page. First, I am in no way offended by you deleting, or requesting deletion of my page. As I have said before and as I believe: Wikipedia exists for the benefit of all. Not everything in the world can be notable. So I am in no way offended. Second, on the bottom of the prod tag that you issued is a statement which directs you to leave information regarding the prod on the creators talk page. Lastly, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I appreciate it and look forward to working on projects involving ice hockey in the future. Good day! keystoneridin! (talk) 08:18, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

NHL free agency

Patience is a virtue. Please, be virtuous. GoodDay (talk) 18:06, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'll wait until you're blocked. TerminalPreppie (talk) 18:17, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Be patient, the contracts-in-question don't expire until the end of June. GoodDay (talk) 18:32, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

They should probably be on there from the time the seasons games end. The tag doesn't necessarily have to mean that they are free agents. But that they will be free agents. I suggest mentioning at the wikiproject. -DJSasso (talk) 18:38, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. TerminalPreppie (talk) 19:24, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Spezza

But almost every notable hockey player has statistics like these, especially if your "top 5" in certains categories (past or present). Spezza is top in the list of achievements for those seasons. It's not a directory, and it's not violating any rules I see, and is notable. (See also Sidney Crosby, Joe Sakic, Wayne Gretzky, etc, etc.) If you want to omit anything not in the Top 5 for Spezza, sounds good. But being in the Top 5 for scoring or ppg is significant enough to mention.

HonestopL 16:11, 06 Sepetmber 2012 (UTC)

Your kind of splitting hairs here - you have on most notable Hockey Players pages with Statistics like these (which doesn't mean it violates the "Wikipedia:NOT#Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information and guidelines Wikipedia:WikiProject_Ice_Hockey/Structure".

That's pretty vague, as it could include all or none of the stats dealing with ANYTHING. If you feel that none of these types of stats should belong (including all-time stats, with these lists like with Mario, Wayne, etc), I suggest you bring it up at up and set clearer definitions (that are acceptable and comply with wikipeidia's own definitions)

Plus wikipedia is not a playground to say "one" is acceptable, while "the others" aren't, it's clearly written in what in states. You just can't list every little stat, I get that, but important ones are (and always have been) notable.

What you're describing and I am, are one in the same. Having some achievements that lists "(Top 5)" statistics is not an "indiscriminate collection of information and guidelines", you could say that about all these Hockey Players pages that include any type of statistic or information. That's the way I look at it, but let's find some middle ground :) I see your perspective and just telling you mine. HonestopL 23:25, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be connected to ChakaKong, maybe your second account? Look so. Very Troubling indeed. Registers and starts editing the day after your last edits almost 2 weeks ago? On the same pages, in the same way? Very, VERY suspicious, maybe a Sockpuppet? HonestopL 1:25, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Lake Erie Monsters

Regarding the Monsters...

The AHL and the Monsters themselves recognize the franchise as beginning in 2007 as an expansion team, with all of the Utah Grizzlies records and history ataached to the ECHL team of the same name.

This is like the situation with the Browns and Ravens in the NFL. All of the Browns' history/records are attached to the current Browns, and the Ravens are recognized by the NFL and the team itself as a 1996 expansion team.

Wikipedia policy is to honor the wishes of the teams and reflect their records and histories. Wiki does so with the Browns and Ravens, and it's the same deal here with the Monsters and Grizzlies.

Whatever the team and league says is law, because it's their histories and records, and it's not Wikipedias job to counter it.

Thank you.

Vjmlhds 19:27, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have showed me enough evidence to where I will stand down. The Monsters have never publically acknowledged their connections to Utah, which is where the confusion came from. I was of the belief that it was a similar situation like the Browns/Ravens in the NFL. But I have seen enough to be convinced otherwise. Vjmlhds 18:52, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited American Hockey League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orlando Solar Bears (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:54, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Peoria Rivermen players

Category:Peoria Rivermen players, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Closeapple (talk) 10:43, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit in Binghamton, New York article

Hi! I see you have reverted an edit in the Binghamton, New York article that we are currently discussing. I'd like to invite you to the discussion so we can come to a mutual consensus on the matter. Thank you! Vmanjr (talk) 14:04, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Peoria prancers 200x200.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Peoria prancers 200x200.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 16:47, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cleveland barons 200x200.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cleveland barons 200x200.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Malpass⁹₃! (what I've been ^up to/_drop me a ^___) 21:58, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, TerminalPreppie. You have new messages at Malpass93's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Malpass⁹₃! (what I've been ^up to/_drop me a ^___) 20:32, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Ice Hockey/League assessment

As an active member of the WikiProject Ice Hockey, you should be aware that there has been a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ice Hockey/League assessment concerning how NHOCKEY will be interpreted. Dolovis (talk) 14:36, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

IIHF WC 2015

Hi, Latvia still can be relegated, from 7th place in the group because the Czech Republic cannot be relegated as a host. IF CZE finishes last in its group :-) then one of the 7th placed teams relegates. --CZMajkl (talk) 18:11, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you to ccwaters

It has been a while since I did any editing and I promise to be careful. I do understand that it may not be a good idea for a family member to make edits, being too close to the subject and all, but I do know that Wizard of Id does not have a "The" and that my father joined the Nineveh church in 1984. Dad also created both strips and asked Brant Parker to co-produce Wizard with him. Thanks for your help! Ppom55 (talk) 23:40, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New to WIKI, NHL Hockey stat updates

Hello, how do we contact someone who updates and edits certain players or teams pages?? I have numbers/stats that would be of good interest and help certain players that need updating on their page, thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.181.190.136 (talk) 21:12, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, TerminalPreppie. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Worcester icecats 200x200.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Worcester icecats 200x200.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:23, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello TerminalPreppie! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 20:36, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ryan Dingle for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ryan Dingle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Dingle until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Yosemiter (talk) 21:54, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American Hockey League Hall of Fame members has been nominated for discussion

Category:American Hockey League Hall of Fame members, which you created, has been nominated for conversion into a list. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:36, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Milwaukee admirals 200x200.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Milwaukee admirals 200x200.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ★ Bigr Tex 20:23, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Omaha ak-sar-ben knights 200x200.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Omaha ak-sar-ben knights 200x200.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:45, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cape breton oilers 200x200.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cape breton oilers 200x200.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Lowell lock monsters 200x200.png

Thank you for uploading File:Lowell lock monsters 200x200.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 13:18, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]