User talk:Smith609
![]() | This user is not currently active on Wikipedia. Smith609 has not edited Wikipedia since 9 January 2024. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
![]() | Because I have little time to edit Wikipedia, if there one of my edits needs copyediting and you are not able to perform this task yourself, the best thing to do is to tag the offending article with Template:Cleanup, leaving a note on its talk page if required. As I watch pages I edit, this means that I or other editors will be able to fix errors as necessary. |
Please note: to avoid duplication, I'll reply to queries on this page.
![]() Archives |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 |
/DOI bot |
AA Dragons for you.
[edit]đ˛đ GinnyThomas (talk) 22:45, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
For creating User:Citation bot 48JcL48 (talk) (contribs) 00:36, 16 April 2024 (UTC) |
Your edit to Gelman-Rubin statistic
[edit]Hello! I reverted you recent edit to Gelman-Rubin statistic. Your edit was badly formatted, and unencyclopedic. If you feel the given formula is incorrect, I encourage you to discuss this issue on the article's talk page. Thanks! DoctorMatt (talk) 06:36, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Well, the talk page already indicates that the forumla is incorrect. I've restored the edit in a more "encyclopaedic" format â if you feel you can improve the formatting, do please feel free to do so, but I think it's worth keeping the reference in there as in my view, it's better to have badly formatted but correct information than formulae that are perfectly formatted but with no indication that they are misleading! Martin (Smith609 â Talk) 09:45, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Tremendous. Outstanding. 2800:BF0:155:E19:D75:1D68:E8FE:562A (talk) 23:50, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Hello Smith I got a report from an Indonesian Wikipedia contributor on the Discord server that your bot inserted online gambling links in Ousman Rambo Jatta's article. Can the link be changed to a much better reference? Badak Jawa (talk) 02:27, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:IPCC4/wg1/5
[edit]Template:IPCC4/wg1/5 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:15, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:IPCC4/wg1/8
[edit]Template:IPCC4/wg1/8 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:16, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:IPCC4/wg1/10
[edit]Template:IPCC4/wg1/10 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:16, 9 February 2025 (UTC)