Jump to content

User talk:Dr. Blofeld: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/2008/June: How do you determine where to add stub categories?
m Reverted edits by Michael Bednarek (talk) to last version by Blofeld of SPECTRE
Line 262: Line 262:


Extraordinary?? Most of them have well over 100 stubs. [[:Category:Opera structure stubs]] has over twice the minimum for stub categories on wikipedia with 134, perfectly within reason. The opera project is not exempt from the stub sorting project and neither is the reason of a bot a valid reason not to sort it. Surely you have WikiProject Opera articles which categorizes all opera articles in the same way? If not, then again your're not following convention. [[User:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''''The Bald One'''''</font>]]</span> <sup>[[User talk:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <font size="-4"><font color="Black">White cat</font></font color> ]]</sup> 11:00, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
Extraordinary?? Most of them have well over 100 stubs. [[:Category:Opera structure stubs]] has over twice the minimum for stub categories on wikipedia with 134, perfectly within reason. The opera project is not exempt from the stub sorting project and neither is the reason of a bot a valid reason not to sort it. Surely you have WikiProject Opera articles which categorizes all opera articles in the same way? If not, then again your're not following convention. [[User:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''''The Bald One'''''</font>]]</span> <sup>[[User talk:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <font size="-4"><font color="Black">White cat</font></font color> ]]</sup> 11:00, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

:… which is unsurprising given that you seem to categorise articles as stubs were not so categorised before. [[User:Michael Bednarek|Michael Bednarek]] ([[User talk:Michael Bednarek|talk]]) 11:32, 19 September 2008 (UTC)


==Image copyright problem with Image:Khandaan.jpg==
==Image copyright problem with Image:Khandaan.jpg==

Revision as of 11:33, 19 September 2008

WARNING:THIS IS A COPYRIGHTED IMAGE, DELETIONIST + STRESS FREE ZONE!

File:Blofeldevilcat.jpg

ERNST STAVRO BLOFELD

Doctorate in Evil Medicine

"I've been expecting you Meester Bond. I thought they had you assassinated in Hong Kong by Number Three"

File:Blofeldbald.jpg

Mr Bigglesworth


Mrs Bigglesworth


File:Atlantic Spotted Dolphins Bahamas 1139303856.jpg
Blofeld's evil aquarium. "You were admiring my aquarium.
$1,000,000 Meester Bond"
File:Pyranha Pygocentrus piraya group 1280 boosted.jpg
Blofeld's evil pet piranha. "They'll strip a man to the bone in 30 seconds. Let this be a reminder to you all that this organization does not tolerate failure". (The Bald One slowly reaches for the anhilation trap door switch)


Archive
S.P.E.C.T.R.E. Archives

  1. Aug 2006
  2. Sept 2006
  3. Oct 2006
  4. Nov 2006
  5. Dec 2006
  6. Jan 2007
  7. Feb 2007
  8. March 2007
  9. April 2007
  10. May 2007
  11. June 2007
  12. July 2007
  13. August 2007
  14. Sept 2007
  15. Oct 2007
  16. Nov 2007
  17. Dec 2007
  18. Jan 2008
  19. Feb 2008
  20. March 2008
  21. April 2008
  22. May 2008
  23. June 2008
  24. July 2008
  25. August 2008
  26. September 2008
"$ 1 million" or the "Alan Parsons Project" will indeed go into "phasing" [citation needed]. In a Belgian accent with Hungarian dialect "Lock on target veh-icle"
Blofeld's nuclear command center for intercepting NASA, Soviet and "Kreblakistani" rockets. It is operated by my North Korean henchman, an evil nuclear scientist and former world snooker professional Ill lit'le Kim Taylor. Scientific research conducted in Pyongyang in the 1960s confirmed that gigantic spectacles block out harmful nuclear radiation and that snooker balls are indeed radioactive and hazardous to the health. See him in action here demonstrating that the adverse effects can be avoided if adequate eyewear is worn
File:NASA LARGE GPN-2000-001317.jpg
"Bring me that astronaut. You made a mistake my friend. No astronaut enters the capsule wearing his air conditioner"
Before messaging the Bald One please remember to give respect to the "magma" outside in the Japanese lake. Those spies out there can track the new activities of Blofeld by using this


Blofeld's Fembot

Warning. Anybody caught trespassing on the property of His Baldness with malicious intent will be eliminated by placing them in an overly elaborate and easily escapable exotic death situation. If you are visiting with tagging for images or have some "frickin" criticism you are likely to hear an amplified response of my elk or my alligator with irritable bowel syndrome coming out of one of the vents in my Japanese volcano previously owned by Hirohito. This organization does not tolerate bitching and the last thing my evil operation wants to do is attend Wiki Councils and be "extorted" by councillors. For those people without a funny bone in their body and for those out there that are as solemn as dust, I urge you to participate in some bearded Yak racing it'll change you forever. If these rules are not acknowledged I am likely to dispatch my metric tonne weighing henchman Israel Kamakawiwoʻole to sit on you personally and play you a nice relaxing old Hawaiian song to take a chill pill and lighten up.
Other than this His Baldness welcomes you with loving arms.


Images

I agree with you. Sadly, there are literally thousands of pages with policy-violating multiple fair use images on Wikipedia, and far too few people willing to tackle them. this list is well out of date now, but contains well over 1,000 articles - and that's only the articles that have (or used to have) 10 or more images! As for your article, wait until the AfD ends (it'll be kept) and put the Zao image back in. As for Frost, I'm not completely convinced, but some text about her appearance in her article would go some way to helping the image along. Black Kite 18:15, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bruley

Perish the thought of all those Protons being smashed together in the tunnel underneath Switzerland by all those crazy scientists. A "big bang" or just another excuse for "dogging". Stan Collymore step up.

I speedy closed that one, as villages are inherantly notable. I'll see what I can do in expanding and translation the article. Sorry to here about your computer--I had the same problem with mine two years ago, and I had to get it replaced. Recently I've been working on Manu Dibango--he's been credited with the fisrst disco song--and Boumba Bek National Park, Nki (which recently passed GA)'s neighbor. When your computer is working properly could you peer review FHB or Leon M'ba again? --I'm an Editorofthewiki[citation needed] 19:40, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've left some comments at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/1964 Gabon coup d'état. If you have time, I wonder if you would revisit it? Thanks, Ling.Nut (talkWP:3IAR) 00:20, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:FaatKiné.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 04:46, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:FirstMenontheMoon.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 06:30, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images help

Blof, please help. User:Sfan00 IMG keeps tagging images I've uploaded for no reason; I can't get what the CSD criteria has to do with this and what his tags are meant for. I was always trying to address his tags, but that doesn't help, he keeps adding irrelevant tags, and loading my talk page with his automatic messages. At first I added rationales (back in time), then when he asked again, source, then even added templates. Now Mspraveen helped me to add FU rationale, and now he tags the images again. It's annoying. Please see the history of my talk page; I reverted his notices but please see the previous revision and the images.

I also see in his talk page editors' warnings to stop tagging images. Please help Blof. ShahidTalk2me 17:01, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What to you mean by copyright holder? I generally use your Filmr tanplate and Mspraveen used the traditional Template:Non-free use rationale. they should cover that all. ShahidTalk2me 17:34, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
LOL - I know what copyright holder is. I mean that neither your nor the other template have such a field. ShahidTalk2me 20:56, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Blof, please see this section: Talk:Preity Zinta#Reviews. I wanted to archive it but as you know this is a research of all the reviews that she's received for her notable films, in order to find out the majority view. I'd worked on it to prevent any case of editors questioning the neutrality of the reviews (remember why I started this research?). I know in the FAC nobody questioned the neutrality of the article (well if they didn't question Reese W's reviews, why would they do that with Zinta's?) because I worked very hard to present reviews which represent the majority view, but anyway, I think it should be kept for everybody to see (that's why I don't want to archive it and leave it on the taslk page).
I have a request and a question:
A) If anybody questions that when I'm not here, please refer them to this analysis.
B) Secondly, what do you think about creating a subpage for that? Something like <Talk:Preity Zinta/Reviews> and link that in the section? Or do you think it's better to leave the section in the way it is now? ShahidTalk2me 07:41, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Right. Nonetheless, since the FAC, I have added some negative quotes as well. But the research is good, so I don't whether archive or not. ShahidTalk2me 12:01, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"Zinta has stated that the tragic accident and her father's death was a significant turning point in her life" - is the grammar here correct? ShahidTalk2me 13:20, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
LOL I know. It's not that though. Well I thought it should be "were" because it refers to the "the tragic accident and her father's death"... You know I'm often very critical of my work. I'm yet to restart our unclosed discussion about something that concerns me. I have so many things to do before I leave, but I have no time - that's what saddens me. ShahidTalk2me 14:08, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Here you have one of the strongest scenes in Khoon Bhari Maang! Brrr CROCODILE!!! ShahidTalk2me 14:53, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
And here's her transformation into a beautiful lass post the plastic surgery. I'm so happy Youtube have uploaded it! ShahidTalk2me 14:57, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
R you serious? Had I shown you that already? And the second part? ShahidTalk2me 15:05, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeh LOL it is after the plastic surgery (yak!)... You must see that. The operation part is disgusting, but the most exciting part is at the end of the video, when Kabir Bedi slaps her son and she discovers her new face. It's amazing. Btw, this surgeon is a famous actor isn't he? What do you think about this part? ShahidTalk2me 15:15, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The only thing I can say is that you are one crazy editor. Only crazy editors like you can work so extensively. Great really. Did you see the plastic surgery? And if yes, did you vomit afterwards? LOL! The surgeon is a British actor isn't he? ShahidTalk2me 21:30, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
hmm interesting, why did you think so? Is it somehow related to the surgery? And this surgeon is he British or not? His face looks so familiar to me... ShahidTalk2me 21:38, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh no it's Tom Alter - he is an Indian of American descent. ShahidTalk2me 21:40, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I mean that I saw him in foreign movies - one of which is Gandhi (film). ShahidTalk2me 21:45, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh yeh forgot about it completely. It's probably one of the most amazing films I've ever seen. It talks about values, conventions, religion, love, childhood, infidelity, helplessness and despair, hope, friendship, dedication. I miss this film so much, I must see it soon. When I have time, I promise to expand it. ShahidTalk2me 21:53, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Beautiful women. Lawson in particular is gorgeous and I like her accent too! ;) Sarah is hot, and a good singer too. I'm now having a fight with some user on the Salman Khan page - he added one little controversy with four references (two of which are unreliable) - I shortened it, as it went to unnecessary detail and unneeded blog sentences. In between, I made some changes on the article, reverted vandalism - and the guy... he fully reverted all my edits to his last version!! Do you know him? I've sent his a message now. ShahidTalk2me 23:28, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
She's HOT!! ShahidTalk2me 22:30, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

General editing

I'm not feeling all that motivated to edit right now since apparently we can't translate anything from another Wikipedia unless we personally access the sources. If this is the case, goodbye. --I'm an Editorofthewiki[citation needed] 22:27, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Technically, the only images allowed for the only purpose of "identification" are the ones you find in an infobox in an article devoted to one character. It is not necessary to visually identify all, or even most characters in any film. Now, if there is real world information present that describes the look of a specific character, and an image would help the understanding (i.e. a source discussing..this discussing, not describing, Jaws's metal teeth..then an image would be well appropriate). If they are removing images from the List of Bond... articles, and those images fail the criteria then there is nothing to do except find the relevant real world information to support the image, or say goodbye to it.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 20:56, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Moving Central American departments

I reported you for supporting, like me, a common naming scheme for country subdivision articles. [1] TopoCode (talk) 04:04, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BotStar!

Thank you! That was very kind. Alai (talk) 14:56, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Youcanthankmelaterdvd.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Youcanthankmelaterdvd.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:51, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Hatem El Mekki.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 11:38, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A. E. Smith (violin maker)

Boy, THAT was quick!! Good to see someone's on their toes. Cheers. -- JackofOz (talk) 13:43, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About my article: Anastasiya Markovich

Hi Blofeld of SPECTRE

Give me some time. In about 3 weeks I go to the Ukraine and will search for third- party sources about her. The outcome of this research I will use in the article.

About the section: Culture impact of her living- and working town. I will rewrite this part in a way that the information will be clear and relevant for this article. I think the environment is important for a certain development in (artistic) live. You are right this part is now not ok for that purposes.

About the category Time etc. Under the images I place this, also Time in Art, This category is in Wikimedia Commons where my images are. I was already surprised that in the Sandbox from Wikipedia this changed in red, I deleted then Time in Art. You are right for the article this not ok, I think for an images its ok.

Two Questions:

When I have rewritten these two parts can I send then the two rewritten parts to you, the old boy (I’m 68) can always learn! Or I can publish then these two parts and wait its good or not.

When the article is ready can I translate this article in German, French, Dutch and Italian and published in the other Wikipedia or is that not a good idea? Labberté K.J. (talk) 18:41, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There's deliberately not, on the theory that geographical features are better split by location than by type. Feel free to propose it, but I'm fairly sure there will be opposition from at least one of the "regulars". For myself, I think it depends on how many "landform specialist" editors there are out there, and how useful such a type would be to them. Alai (talk) 20:36, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:FlynnSaunders1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:FlynnSaunders1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:10, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, B. of S.

I have a lot of pictures, landscape, towns etc. It’s not a problem for me to publish these. The only think is, this uploading form is like filling in a tax form! I use now already Word, copy and its ready, but that’s not working in the category! I use already the trick uploading without this part and then editing from Word (don't tell anybody, my hunting dog is coming)! Is there not a quicker way? Can I make a new tap on my user page, if yes how? How I can edit, for example, under the M the painters name from my article? Thanks and Regards, The old boy from Holland. Labberté K.J. (talk) 10:41, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Districts of Laos

Talk:Districts of Laos TopoCode (talk) 16:45, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Danish film

Alas, only 46 thus far. Start editing. Her Pegship (tis herself) 17:32, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re: Worst film ever

Hi mate. A few contenders for me: Crash, Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas and Police Academy 7. All very, very bad. Lugnuts (talk) 17:42, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

Thank you for the completely unexpected barnstar. I appreciate it, and so will my wonderful dentist when I tell her. Finetooth (talk) 19:21, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

VDCs

Hmm. I wonder why we didn't think of that sooner, since it was right on the government page! Your friend Eddy of the wiki[citation needed] 20:29, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have recently nominated this category, which you created, for deletion. Please see the discussion here. --Eliyak T·C 21:55, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Morzeny.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Morzeny.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:22, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bengali film

Thanks for advice...I should obey this. I want to complete all red to blue and all past Bengali Movie.I think I can help from you. Here is a problem. There are no good online reference of the Bengali film and Bengali film Industry. Only www.gomolo.in and The telegraph newspaper reference available. But betwen past 1940 to 1990 years no data avalabe on web. The there have many books avalable on market. Bengali film and Bengali film Industry related people are popular in eastern India, Bangladesh, Assam and Tripura. If I refere those (books,magazine,etc) reference, it is accepted in wiki? Few days ago I started an article Rudranil Ghosh, But it taged as Deletion. So I afraid. --Jayanta Nath 05:27, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:HobieBuchannon.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:HobieBuchannon.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:27, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, this image is not of the Arzoo 1950 film, all the cast on the cover acted in 1960's era movies and none of the film's cast shows up on the cover.Haphar (talk) 12:38, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure will work on them, but might not be able to work at the same rate as I once did on the Hindi movie articles ( and that was dextrous of you to change "Bollywood" to Hindi movie, remembered that I do not like the term Bollywood eh ;-).) Haphar (talk) 12:47, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Country subdivisions

Maybe I get blocked soon and then cannot go on with the work easily and cannot talk to you anymore. So here a small reference to Wikipedia:WikiProject_Country_subdivisions#Current_tasks - maybe it would be good to have only one Infobox template. Bots could convert the data. Also the NC would be good to be improved and made into a policy so that people converting "Copenhague municipality" to "Copenhague Municipality" have it easier. TopoCode (talk) 13:17, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Translating Tarnowskie Góry

I would if I had more time; try asking at WP:PWNB for more volunteers (I still may help at some point).--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 16:47, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sia, le rêve du python

Hey there, I am back on Wikipedia for the long haul. And I have new article you might like, with a Burkina Faso heritage: Sia, le rêve du python. I shared this with EotW, too -- you guys are keeping Burkina Faso front-and-center on Wikipedia. Cheers! Ecoleetage (talk) 02:36, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films coordinator elections - voting now open!

Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 20:27, 17 September 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Senegal

Good--I noticed that site earlier, though I put it on the back burner in favor of Burkina. I'll look into the Cinema of Senegal, though I'm currently occupied with 1964 Gabon's FAC. Regards Your friend Eddy of the wiki[citation needed]

Grutness and I are wondering if you might like to close this long proposal that dates from June, but still hasn't been closed by the Stubs Project. Regards and many thanks if you have a spare moment to attend to this! --Kleinzach 00:49, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah - sorry to dump this with you (please don't set your evil henchmen onto me!), but all the regular proposals-closers seem to have been involved in this debate, so it was a case of finding a reliable experienced stub regular who'd be able to do the job. Kleinzach and Pegship's comments at the end of the debate seem to sum it up quite well. Grutness...wha? 03:14, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see you have closed the discussion to the effect that WikiProject Stub sorting will now create the following new stubs:

Um... could you please post to the Opera Project Talk Page about how these are supposed to work? For example, what sort of stub are we supposed to use for operas in other languages? Like Russian, Czech, Polish, Spanish etc.? Do we continue with this one {{Opera-stub}} for those? OP members may have other questions as well. We'd really appreciate your input. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 21:48, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes please can you explain these extraordinary decisions to the Opera Project? At the end of the discussion I suggested that no action was required now and this seems to have been accepted as a final view. --Kleinzach 23:08, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Extraordinary?? Most of them have well over 100 stubs. Category:Opera structure stubs has over twice the minimum for stub categories on wikipedia with 134, perfectly within reason. The opera project is not exempt from the stub sorting project and neither is the reason of a bot a valid reason not to sort it. Surely you have WikiProject Opera articles which categorizes all opera articles in the same way? If not, then again your're not following convention. The Bald One White cat 11:00, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Khandaan.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 02:43, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:RobertGouletasHabsburg.jpg

Ho Blofeld. The image you uploaded, Image:RobertGouletasHabsburg.jpg, doesn't seem to be working. -- Suntag 03:00, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was corrupted badly, wouldn't give a regular image in firefox, wouldn't thumbnail in ie7. SkierRMH (talk) 04:08, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:La Beauté du diable.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 09:22, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Hey Blof! How're you doing? It's been a while. What's going on? Mspraveen (talk) 16:20, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LOL? Do I crack you up or something? :)) Well, it's just been fine. DYK'ing some Indian cinema articles and that's pretty much it these days. What's with you? Mspraveen (talk) 04:48, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Re: Closing Opera-stub

Sounds fine to me, but no doubt there will be arguments from some sources no matter what is done (as you may have already found out, by the looks of comments further up this page - sorry!) Thanks. Grutness...wha? 00:43, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]