User talk:Bianca7479

Revisions to List of people killed by dogs in the United States

I have reverted your edits that deleted the entries for Ernie Assad and James Chapple. If the newspapers have misreported the cause of death for these two individuals then you will need to make available verified evidence (per WP:RS) to back up your assertion. A mere assertion of what the medical examiners found (or did not find) is insufficient to delete information backed up by sources that are considered reliable under WP:RS guidelines. Thanks! Astro$01 (talk) 23:36, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Please read the citations you have listed for James Chapple - none of the citations you list claim or state that Mr. Chapple died from the results of the dog attack 2 months previous. It merely says he died two months after the attack.

Mr. Chapple died of natural causes totally unrelated to any dog bite injuries he suffered 2 months earlier.

As for Mr. Assad - Mr. Assad received superficial bites only - he was was taken to the hospital and released the same day as the "attack." Mr. Assad was re-admitted to the hospital the next day and subsequently had a stroke and died as the result of an pulmonary edema. (unrelated to dog bites) Autopsy reports are not available on the internet, but that does not negate their findings as a reference- The articles you cite on Mr. Assad do not claim that the coroner ruled Mr. Assad's death to be a result of dog bites.

January 2010

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 98.248.32.44 (talk) 03:31, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

POV edits

It's become obvious that your edits are all focused on one thing - making pit bulls look better. You make claims that are not supported by the citations or put your own spin on them. This edit in particular is a blatant POV edit since the source cannot be verified either way. Unless you can provide proper, reliable and verifiable sources, your edits will be reverted and you'll end up being blocked. 98.248.41.72 (talk) 22:15, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

You have deleted added references and citations (including newspaper articles and links to websites) with no explanation other than "whitewash." You obviously did not bother to read any of the references before deleting them in mass or you would have found "proper, reliable, and verifiable sources" for the additons and for the rearranging of material by this user.

No deletions to the webpage or material was made by this user.

You deleted all added references in mass with no explanation other than "whitewash" - this constitutes vandalism.

Perhaps each addition I made was not explained in the byline, but if you bother to read the original citation or the added citations you would have seen proper documentation.

You did not. YOu simply deleted all changes made without explanation.

Please follow your own quoted rules before admonishing othersBianca7479 (talk) 00:29, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Blocked as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. (blocked by –MuZemike 19:51, 24 January 2010 (UTC))
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.