User talk:Bhashaji

This is Bhashaji's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sheru Say Cheese (October 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submiEjaz Afzal Khanssion, go to Draft:Sheru Say Cheese and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:11, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bhashaji! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:11, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SafariScribeThank you for your feedback. I have reviewed the article and added additional reliable sources to ensure that the information can be fully verified. These sources meet Wikipedia's standards for notability and reliability, as they include coverage from independent, reputable publications. Could you please review the updated draft and check the references for verification? Additionally, if you have any further suggestions for improving the article to meet Wikipedia’s criteria, I would be grateful for your guidance. Thank you for your assistance. Bhashaji (talk) 19:40, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COI

Hi, you had added a COI edit request template to Draft:Thetrendingpeople. This template is used to make edit requests via a published article's talk page. If you instead would like to disclose your conflict of interest in Draft:Thetrendingpeople, please either place the {{User COI}} template on your own user page, or the {{connected}} template on the draft talk page, or both. Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:17, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @DoubleGrazing

Thank you for clarifying! I’ve added the template in my draft Thetrendingpeople as you suggested. I really greatfull for your guidance and support.

Thanks again! Bhashaji (talk) 18:19, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but that's not the right template to use. You need to use either of the two templates I mentioned in my post above. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:15, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PS: I should also add that if the nature of your COI is such that you are being paid or otherwise rewarded for your edits, then instead of the generic COI disclosure you should disclose the more specific paid-editing one, by placing the {{paid}} template, duly completed, on your talk page. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:21, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thetrendingpeople (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thetrendingpeople and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:23, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mentor, @DoubleGrazing

Thank you for your review and feedback on my draft. I understand the importance of ensuring that all sources meet Wikipedia’s notability and reliability standards. I believe I have included multiple published sources that provide in-depth, independent, and secondary coverage of the subject.

Could you please take another cheak look and cheak on Google and let me know if there are any specific areas where the references fall short? Your guidance would be invaluable as I work to meet the requirements for moving this article into the main space.

Best regards, Bhashaji (talk) 11:51, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thetrendingpeople (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thetrendingpeople and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 18:31, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sheru Say Cheese (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RachelTensions was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Article doesn't show how the subject meets film notability criteria at WP:NFILM

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sheru Say Cheese and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RachelTensions (talk) 00:31, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Say Cheese (November 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CFA was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Say Cheese and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

C F A 💬 22:11, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @CFA Thank you for your review and feedback. I am actively working on finding more reliable and independent secondary sources to establish the notability of the subject. Once I have researched the additional references that meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines, I will update the submission accordingly. I will notify you once the revisions are complete from my end. Thank you for your support and help Bhashaji (talk) 09:49, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Bhashaji! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Request for Help with Declined Submission, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:16, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eyre family, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Estate. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DPL bot Hello, and thank you for the notification. I appreciate the automated process catching this. I will review the link and ensure it points to the correct page instead of the disambiguation page for Estate. Please let me know if there are any further issues. Bhashaji (talk) 09:16, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amel Larrieux, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DPL bot Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I appreciate the notice regarding the link pointing to the disambiguation page Amel Larrieux I will review the edit and update the link to point directly to the intended article for clarity and accuracy. Bhashaji (talk) 06:05, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COI declarations are required from paid/involved editors

Hello, Bhashaji. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:43, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ohnoitsjamie,

Thank you for your message and for reminding me of the important points regarding Wikipedia's conflict of interest guidelines. I appreciate your efforts to ensure compliance and integrity in editing.

Please rest assured that I am currently undergoing training with Wiki Education and am committed to contributing in good faith while adhering to Wikipedia’s policies. I value your guidance and will continue to approach my contributions with professionalism and respect for community standards.

Best regards, Bhashaji (talk) 06:17, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop rejecting/accepting AFC articles until you are more experienced

Only seasoned and experienced users should be rejecting or accepting AFC articles; it's clear from this edit that you don't have sufficient understanding of this area to be doing that. That subject of that article was a member of the highest court in Pakistan; per Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Politicians_and_judges, there's a good chance they meet our notability guidelines. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:43, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your feedback and for pointing out the importance of careful consideration when reviewing AFC submissions, particularly for topics of significant notability like this one. I appreciate you bringing this guideline to my attention and will take it into account going forward.

Your guidance helps me better understand the nuances of Wikipedia's notability criteria, especially for judges and politicians, and I will strive to improve my evaluations to align with community expectations.

Best regards, Bhashaji (talk) 06:22, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]