Jump to content

User talk:Jalapeño

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:BenzoAid)

It is 07:46, on Sunday, 23 February 2025

User:Jalapeño
User:Jalapeño
User talk:Jalapeño
User talk:Jalapeño
User:Jalapeño/Gallery
User:Jalapeño/Gallery
User:Jalapeño/WIP
User:Jalapeño/WIP
Special:Contributions/Jalapeño
Special:Contributions/Jalapeño
Special:Emailuser/Jalapeño
Special:Emailuser/Jalapeño
User:Jalapeño/Barnstars
User:Jalapeño/Barnstars



Remember to put your signature after your message with 4 tildes (~~~~). Thank you. 🔥Jalapeño🔥











IMPORTANT

[edit]

Please use "New section"/"Add topic" instead of "Edit"/"Edit source" on this page, so you can read the page notice. I moved the page notice from the talk page to its special page because it looks tacky on the start of my talk page. So please, read it.

Thank you, 🔥Jalapeño🔥

WHO members

[edit]

I reverted your edits to WHO changing the membership map to exclude the US. The executive order does not have international effect. It only starts US internal process. AncientWalrus (talk) 09:51, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Actually the SVG change was fine. You didn't change membership, it just coincided with a vandalistic edit to the map on commons. Apologies for reverting that. I still wouldn't add a map under edit warring to the infobox when it's already in the article though. AncientWalrus (talk) 10:05, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, thanks for the info. I've changed the SVG map to list the US as "in process of withdrawal". 🔥Jalapeño🔥 contribs 11:20, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That's not a membership status the WHO has. The US is and remains a full member legally. Withdrawal process is entirely US-internal at this point with no international effect hence such an edit would be incorrect. AncientWalrus (talk) 02:30, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Non-attributed translations

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from nl:Academie Tien to Academie Tien. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. Sample wording for this is given here. If you forgot, or were not aware of this requirement, attribution must be given retroactively, for example:

NOTE: Content in the edit of 01:25, January 25, 2023 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

Retroactive attribution may be added using a dummy edit; see Repairing insufficient attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Reconrabbit 14:32, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Warfare Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Battle of the Basya River on a "Warfare" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Warfare Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:2014 Southern Yemen offensive on a "Warfare" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Warfare Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Battle of Bharali (1615) on a "Warfare" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:30, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The CSD was declined by another user because the article had been up for years: you may need to use the regular deletion procedure to nominate said article for deletion. I think the whole article needs rewriting at the very least because it appears to have received a lot of undisclosed COI editing, and some of the references used are questionable. --Minoa (talk) 01:44, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]