User talk:Baseball023
June 2015
[edit]
Your recent editing history at Mike Trout shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
While I can see why you would like to restore your content, Wikipedia has a three-revert rule which prevents anyone from makes more than three reverts within 24 hours, except when dealing with obvious vandalism, which does not include the removal of content in an article. I do realise that it may be frustrating but it would be great if you could at least attempt to discuss the issue on Talk:Mike_Trout. — Andrew Y talk contrib 21:54, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
[edit]
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Baseball023, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
– Muboshgu (talk) 21:57, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
I only have one account
Block Notice
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mike V • Talk 22:45, 11 June 2015 (UTC)