User talk:BartBenjamin

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! -- Francs2000 | Talk [[]] 17:29, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Great Work!

I just wanted to thank you for the great job you did on the SS Morro Castle page. I was hoping someone knowledgeable would come along and give that page the attention it needed. Excellent work. I put together a page on the SS Noronic myself, but there are still a lot of maritime disasters that need attention, so I'm glad to know you're around. And hey, if you ever feel like starting a page on the SS Yarmouth Castle fire, go for it! I've been meaning to start that page myself, but just haven't found the time. Thanks again for your valuable contribution. -- Jagvar Apr 7, 2005

More good work

I want just wanted to thank you for getting the information about Titanic's rudder rewritten and corrected. It was the last part of the RMS Titanic aritcle that I felt was still questionable. Getting the technicalities down was beyond my ability. Thanks again and keep up the good work. MechBrowman 04:00, Apr 7, 2005 (UTC)

Illinois community college system

Bart, I noticed that you work at Triton College and did the article on that college. Would you mind taking a look at my new article Illinois community college system and see if it sounds right to you? DS1953 06:35, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Images related to Titanic

Hi BartBenjamin, could you put the copyright information for Image:Californian.jpg and Image:Carpathia.jpg?

Thanks MechBrowman July 7, 2005 15:31 (UTC)

Gettysburg Address

I made some "peer review" suggestions. Hope they're helpful. Kaisershatner 18:35, 18 October 2005 (UTC) Thanks for cleaning up this page and replacing my HTML with Wiki. It looks and reads much better with fewer line spaces. Bart 00:18, Apr 19, 2005 (UTC) You're welcome. It's good to keep articles in a roughly common style and using the Wiki markup instead of raw HTML helps to do that. Hal Jespersen 00:30, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I made some copyedits/structural changes. Hope you like them. Also, can you provide a source for the "Wills invited Lincoln as an afterthought" statement? That's fascinating and readers should know where that comes from. Kaisershatner 19:39, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your spelling correction of "battle-field" because that is how Lincoln spelled it. I recall seeing this specifically referenced in a discussion of how the English language and spelling evolves over time. I, unfortunately, do not own an original manuscript of the Gettysburg Address to verify this, though the fact that it was originally transcribed with the hyphen would tend to back my sometimes faulty memory. The modern spelling is used in the text of the article, of course, but Lincoln's spelling should be used in the transcription of the document itself. Thanks. -- Kbh3rd 04:33, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I left a note at Talk:Gettysburg Address regarding how to archive old talk categories. No big deal, but just FYI. The article is looking better and better - we should aim for WP:FAC soon. Kaisershatner 16:23, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note. The article is really getting better. We need to refer to WP:FAC and the guidelines for FA's. There are lots of details that count, like making sure the references are properly formatted. I would recommend looking at some of the current FA candidates to see what kind of vetting they go through and to see if we can head off some of the easy ones. I'll look for more sources we could potentially include to give some different viewpoints. I'm glad you drew my attention to this article - it's a great subject and you've done a nice job with it. Kaisershatner 19:38, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

OMG you're going to love what I just found in the public domain. Kaisershatner 19:45, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hey - I saw your recent edit so I know you're around. I think it's time to resubmit to Peer review, and hopefully make a final push toward FA status. (see my notes at Talk:Gettysburg Address). You agree? Kaisershatner 19:01, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - tomorrow will be 1 week of Peer review and there haven't been new comments since the references were fixed. As noted on Talk, I've already run it against WP:FAC and I think we look good. Want to do the honors of nominating it, or shall I? Kaisershatner 18:27, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hooray, we're looking good, and happy holidays to you too. Re: your questions, I have to admit I've been wondering the same thing. I'll poke around the wikifaqs a bit, but basically the answer isn't clear to me either! FYI once we do get FA status, I have in mind as our next step to request to be the front page article on either Presidents' Day or Lincoln's Birthday or something coming up soon, rather than waiting around for next November. Best, Kaisershatner 18:07, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

CONGRATS, and happy new year. As of this edit:[1] GA was removed from FAC and Talk:Gettysburg Address now indicates it is a Featured Article! Update your user page. I'm going to see if we can get GA onto the Main Page, as I noted above. It was really fun working on this with you - I learned a tremendous amount about a fascinating subject - one of the major reasons I enjoy using the wikipedia. Hope to see you around - Kaisershatner 14:04, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note! See our nomination at Wikipedia_talk:Tomorrow's_featured_article Kaisershatner 16:54, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:VtransitsJ.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:VtransitsJ.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Admrb♉ltz (T | C) 08:53, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Occultation.jpg

This image may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Occultation.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --OrphanBot 02:58, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Occultation.jpg

I have clarified the copyright information for this photograph, per your request. Please note that this is a shared image file from the Wikimedia Commons website.

I am not particularly pleased that a) you deleted the picture the same day that you issued a warning thereby giving me virtually no time to address the issue, b) a copyright notice "self|cc-by-sa-2.5" had existed on that page since December 13th, so I don't understand why "the copyright status was unclear," and c) it should have also been clear from reading my caption that this photograph taken by the same person who posted it -- namely me, User:BartBenjamin.

I am still rather new to Wikipedia and therefore do not always know the best designation that various images should carry. Perhaps the following designation that I have changed it to will more meet with your approval than the previous designation. Bart 01:45, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I, the creator of this work, hereby grant the permission to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. Subject to disclaimers.

If this file is eligible for relicensing, it may also be used under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license.
The relicensing status of this image has not yet been reviewed. You can help.

What happened is a bit complicated: It looks like the image existed on both Wikipedia and Commons. The Wikipedia version didn't have any source information, and was tagged as such. The Commons version was tagged as {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}}, and indicated the source. Because of the way the Wikipedia software works, the image shown was the copy from the English Wikipedia, while the description was a combination of the two, indicating that the image was unsourced, but under the cc-by-sa license (not that unusual, people often upload images and indicate a free license, but don't give enough information to verify it).

At this point, OrphanBot, a program I wrote to try to clean up the mess of unsourced images, came along and spotted the {{nosource}} tag on the Wikipedia copy of the image. Since it thought the image had no source information, it removed it from Occultation. Shortly afterwards, User:Nv8200p deleted the Wikipedia copy of the image, since it had been tagged as {{nosource}} for over a week. The copy of the image on Commons appears to be just fine. --Carnildo 05:04, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Awards received\Barnstars

I added a new section to your userpage which I found missing, Awards Received, so I could give you the 2 barnstars I thought you deserved for your work on the Gettysburg Address article, please, do re-edit it to fit your page scheme. Once again gratz on your great work :) --Chaos Reaver 01:08, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're very much so welcome :)

About the barnstars, you're welcome :) It's my duty as wikipedian to recgnize those who do particularly fine works to the community, and yours was one of the best I have seen of late. Keep up the good work! Two thumbs up :) --Chaos Reaver 01:19, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Main Page

Yes, I saw it too! I'm delighted. Great work on that article & all the best. Kaisershatner 20:31, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A new project for us?

Bart, hope all's well. Trolling WP:FAC I noticed the (atrocious) United States Bill of Rights, and have launched into a major rewrite. Given the similarity of the subject to our previously successful collaboration, I thought you might want to take a look, and would welcome your contributions. Obviously, it's going to be much broader than the good old GA was, but that means more help will be required. All the best, Kaisershatner 16:08, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bart, I'm trying to get this one over the goal line: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates#United States Bill of Rights. I'm just asking that in the event the article meets criteria you would vote to support - if you don't think it's ready, then vote against, I won't take it personally. Regards, Kaisershatner 16:57, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Morro Castle 1.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Morro Castle 1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stan 03:39, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Venus transit BB.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Venus transit BB.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 19:59, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I just stopped by to say hello. Have a nice day Ω Anonymous anonymous Ψ: ''Have A Nice Day'' 22:25, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sheryl Crow image

Do you know what the original picture of Crow that was deemed inappropriate was? Hyacinth 19:20, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

re: warning anons about vandalism

Hello there, I was looking at the Recent Changes page and noticed your alert on the Admin. page on vandalism.

While I'm not an admin, I did want to let you know that if you do encounter an anonymous user who is vandalising articles, but who lacks a talk page, you are welcome to start a talk page for that user by clicking on the "discussion" tab and typing out your warning. I hope this helps. --Tachikoma 02:25, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Century of Progress

Hi! It seems that on 17 April 2005 you added an external link to said article about the controversy between Germans and Americans over the Zeppelin and German Politics. Unfortunately the link has become broken. If you can find the page again please let me know, as I'm interested in all things Zeppelin, and also in all things "Bucky/dymaxion". --BjKa 13:47, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Morro Castle 2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Morro Castle 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:52, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Morro Castle 1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Morro Castle 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:31, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Sidescover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sidescover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:57, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sidescover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sidescover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:56, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gettysburg Address FAR

Gettysburg Address has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. KnightLago (talk) 16:04, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Cachet.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Cachet.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:21, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Since my planetarium produced this postal cachet, I fail to see how I could be infringing on anyone else's copyright. Unfortunately, I do not have time to write a legal brief on this subject, so feel free to delete the image. You and your kin are ruining Wikipedia. Soon, only lawyers will possess the skills needed to negotiate the maze of Wikipedia rules and inconsistencies. Bart (talk) 03:01, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Stories Project

Aloha!

My name is Victor Grigas, I’m a storyteller at the Wikimedia Foundation in San Francisco working on collecting stories of interesting Wikipedians that can be used to compel donations for the 2011 fundraiser.

I'm originally from Chicago and have edited a far bit about my home city. I found your user name on this list: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Category:Wikipedians_in_Chicago

If you are interested in participating, and would like to schedule a telephone or Skype interview with me, please send me an email (vgrigas@wikimedia.org) along with any questions or concerns you may have.

Thanks for your time!

Victor, User:Victorgrigas

PS If you know of anyone with whom I should speak please let me know :) Victor Grigas (talk) 18:48, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SherylCrow-Memphis.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SherylCrow-Memphis.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:00, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:VeryBest cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:VeryBest cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:07, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Morro Castle 1.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Morro Castle 1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:02, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:77thflag.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:16, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited: Art & Feminism Edit-a-thon

Art & Feminism Edit-a-Thon - In a city near you! - You are invited!

File:Csaky madonna.jpg

The first ever Art and Feminism Edit-a-thon will be held on Saturday, February 1, 2014 across the United States and Canada - including Chicago! Wikipedians of all experience levels are welcome to join!

Any editors interested in the intersection of feminism and art are welcome. Experienced editors will be on hand to help new editors.
Bring a friend and a laptop! Come one, come all! Learn more here!

SarahStierch (talk) 05:35, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GlobeSessions cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GlobeSessions cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:49, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SherylCrow cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SherylCrow cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:02, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, BartBenjamin. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cernan (disambiguation)

The article Cernan (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:PTM and WP:3DABS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Nevé –selbert 18:52, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, BartBenjamin. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, BartBenjamin. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gettysburg Address Featured article review

I have nominated Gettysburg Address for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:09, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wildflower cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wildflower cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:57, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CoP-photo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CoP-photo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:CESC planetarium.png

The file File:CESC planetarium.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, redundant to File:Cernan Earth and Space Center.jpg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 07:21, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]