User talk:Bann Smaori
Welcome
[edit]
|
Bann Smaori, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi Bann Smaori! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:06, 12 March 2017 (UTC) |
March 2017
[edit]Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! L3X1 (distant write) 16:27, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Aiken Barracks
[edit]Hi - Thanks for your edits to Aiken Barracks. Your edits did not included citations as required by WP:CITE and have therefore been partially reverted. It is very important that all information is properly cited. Thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 23:14, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
March 2017
[edit]Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Axe murder incident. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. L3X1 (distant write) 22:37, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
May 2017
[edit]Hello, I'm Editor abcdef. Your recent edit to the page al-Nusra Front appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Editor abcdef (talk) 06:28, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Sikorsky SH-60 Seahawk. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. -Fnlayson (talk) 18:45, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
Removal of cited material (and/or replacement with material which doesn't align with cites)
[edit]Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to National Maternity Hospital, Dublin. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Similar issues are evident on other articles. Including List of Irish military installations. After approaching 8 years of similar discussions, it will also come as no surprise that abuse of multiple-accounts, tendentious editing and tagging, and failure to use an appropriate edit summary are also not in-line with norms expected of project participants. Guliolopez (talk) 19:05, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
- The same issue applies to your edit to Carrauntoohil. Please don't reinterpret cited sources. Thanks ww2censor (talk) 17:57, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
SCW sanctions
[edit]Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.
General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. Editor abcdef (talk) 05:25, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Bann_Smaori reported by User:Editor abcdef (Result: ). Thank you. Editor abcdef (talk) 02:37, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. DrKay (talk) 09:10, 13 May 2017 (UTC)