User talk:Balintawak/2018/July
Speedy deletion nomination of Higgs Fletcher & Mack
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Higgs Fletcher & Mack requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 04:06, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
Other California Law Firms on Wikipedia:
[edit]California
[edit]- The Cochran Firm, based in Los Angeles
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, based in Los Angeles
- Irell & Manella, based in Los Angeles
- Kabateck Brown Kellner, based in Los Angeles
- Kiesel Boucher Larson, based in Los Angeles
- Latham & Watkins, based in Los Angeles
- Public Counsel, based in Los Angeles
- Los Angeles Dependency Lawyers, based in Los Angeles
- Lyon & Lyon, based in Los Angeles
- Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, based in Los Angeles
- Moxon & Kobrin, based in Los Angeles
- Munger, Tolles & Olson, based in Los Angeles
- Nossaman, based in Los Angeles
- O'Melveny & Myers, based in Los Angeles
- Paul Hastings, based in Los Angeles
- Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, based in Los Angeles
- Trevor Law Group, based in Los Angeles
- Cooley LLP, based in Palo Alto
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, based in Palo Alto
- Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps, based in San Diego
- Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, based in San Diego
- Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, based in San Francisco
- Center on Race, Poverty & the Environment, based in San Francisco
- Gordon & Rees, based in San Francisco
- Graham & James, based in San Francisco
- Halleck, Peachy & Billings, based in San Francisco
- Heller Ehrman, based in San Francisco
- Keker & Van Nest, based in San Francisco
- Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, based in San Francisco
- Littler Mendelson, based in San Francisco
- Morrison & Foerster, based in San Francisco
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, based in San Francisco
- Thelen LLP, based in San Francisco
- Adelson, Testan, Brundo & Jimenez
- Donahue Gallagher Woods
- Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith
- Romero Institute
- Rutan & Tucker
- Silicon Valley Law Group
- Stubbs Alderton & Markiles
Balintawak (talk) 05:49, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
Alternative account
[edit]Why did you create Balintawak2 (talk · contribs · count)?--Bbb23 (talk) 19:25, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
I couldn't log in to my old account. I thought is was deactivated for inactivity. I read that deactivated accounts are dead and I had to create a new one. After I created the new account, I was able to access the old one. I read that additional accounts had to be disclosed, so I disclosed them both with user boxes.
I recently retired and have time on my hands.
If the 2nd account isn't allowed, please deactivate it. Balintawak (talk) 18:55, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- Technically, it's allowed but if there's no longer a purpose for it, I'd rather block it (no such thing as "deactivate"). I'll make it clear in the block log that it is not a block based on sanctions. Is that okay with you.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:08, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
block
[edit]You're right. Blocked. I thought the old account was blocked. I don't need the 2nd account. Thanks. Balintawak (talk) 19:13, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- Done --Bbb23 (talk) 19:32, 22 July 2018 (UTC)