User talk:Buzzards-Watch Me Work
(Redirected from User talk:B-watchmework)
Retired
This user is no longer active on Wikipedia as of March 2020 (Due to credibility and dissatisfaction with reporting systems).
Sockpuppet investigation
[edit]You've been mentioned here: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Buzzards-Watch_Me_Work Snooganssnoogans (talk) 03:10, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry
[edit] | This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Buzzards-Watch Me Work. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. TonyBallioni (talk) 06:38, 18 May 2020 (UTC) |
Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 00:37, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation (March 2022)
[edit]You have been mentioned here: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Buzzards-Watch_Me_Work Snooganssnoogans (talk) 20:49, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation (2x March 2022)
[edit]You have been mentioned here: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Buzzards-Watch_Me_Work Snooganssnoogans (talk) 15:01, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry
[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Buzzards-Watch Me Work. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:31, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.