Jump to content

User talk:DIVINE

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Azkord)

Unblock

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DIVINE (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please check UTRS appeal #87097 too as my TPA was revoked before. Just to note that most of the users to whom my tagged at COI notice has been found using multiple accounts and has been blocked by CU. About legal threats I have personally apologized user:usedtobecool about my actions and behavior. About their all concerns which they mentioned on AN I have made them clear that I haven’t filed any official complaint against them anywhere and will not do that also you can verify that in my talk page. Also, I request you to note that whenever I get into AN my anxiety level rises too much which I had also mentioned in AN. While user: Bivhuti45 was dragging me off being a sock puppet and was making personal attacks at me, I requested admins to check them out multiple times but finally rogusill has blocked them too due to their UPE and ignoring multiple COI warnings. Also, I cannot deny that I haven’t made mistakes. I Have done many, but I want to contribute further to keep those mistakes in my mind and disclosing all of my previous coi/upe editing which I have done. Please consider my unblock request thankyou. DIVINE 20:53, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per the consensus at this AN discussion, the community has declined your appeal and imposed a six-month moratorium on future appeals. Do not appeal your sanction, here or at UTRS, before October 12, 2024. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 01:36, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Tech News: 2024-15

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-16

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:27, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-17

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:25, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-18

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 03:31, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-19

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 16:42, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-20

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-21

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:02, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-22

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:13, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-23

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 22:32, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-24

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:18, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-25

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:46, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-26

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 22:30, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Bongkosh Rittichainuwat has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

On second thought, this ought to just be deleted as a non-notable UPE/COI creation

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JoelleJay (talk) 03:33, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-27

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:57, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-28

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 21:29, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-29

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 01:29, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-30

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:02, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-31

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:08, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-32

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:41, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-33

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:19, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-34

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:50, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-35

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:29, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-36

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 01:04, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-37

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 18:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-38

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:59, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-39

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:33, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-40

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 22:16, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-41

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:39, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Unblock Request

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DIVINE (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am requesting the unblocking administrator or the community to unblock me because I have understood the cause of my blockage. Why did I get blocked, and how would I have dealt with the situation calmly without providing legal threats already resolved long before, yeah more than six months if I recall it might be seven. I accepted that I was paid to vote for [AFD] and I revealed it myself which helped to block larger PR firms even after I got blocked I supplied information to concerned users and someone who claims to be an invisible administrator which I had submitted evidence long back to administrators.

In the period, I get blocked, I haven't used multiple IDs nor have I edited from any IP or any new ID i.e. CU can verify this humble request first before anyone reviews my unblocking request because, in the past, I have faced many failed SPI requests against me.

Within a pperiod of Six months after getting blocked, I have contributed to SimpleWiki which is kind of similar to Enwiki and I believe I have improved my English skills by learning and contributing via simple English.

To make this request short:

1) I understand why I was blocked and I will avoid those mistakes again and will only submit WP:BLP via WP:DRAFT and will follow further to get unblock from Mainspace WP:BLP in the future. 2) I won't vote in AFD for an additional Six months and request to community later 3) I love Wikipedia thus I have been here for 10 years and I still want to make an effective contribution and help Wikipedia as an individual volunteer once again 4)I have never doxed anyone's identity, but I was the victim of doxing before from few Nepali administrators which I will keep confidential and I have proof of how they misused their power.

Thankyou for considering this request :) DIVINE 08:42, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

AN request closed as unsuccessful in tandem with DIVINE seemingly withdrawing their request Star Mississippi 21:59, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • For reviewer convenience, AN appeal in April, this version of their Talk which has the parallel discussion. Star Mississippi 13:32, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    As this block was considered by the community at AN, DIVINE is considered WP:CBAN and needs to appeal to AN. DIVINE, do you want this entire message to be carried over to AN as your appeal, do you only want a part to be carried over to AN, or do you want to compose a fresh appeal?

    Before we do anything, {{Checkuser needed}} to confirm if there has been any evasion? HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:08, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Thankyou @HouseBlaster. I want this entire request to be forwarded to AN as my appeal. DIVINE 03:57, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    No block evasion found in a checkuser check. PhilKnight (talk) 11:29, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Carried over to AN. Let me know if you need anything else carried over, and I would be happy to help. Best, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 23:44, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks @HouseBlaster Can you pass this:
    Reply to Deepfriendokra & Liz:
    To Okra, Yes, I was involved in multiple UPEs (three Wikipedia pages). I had done a few COI edits. When I am unblocked, I will declare all of the in my user page. But all I want is one more chance, and I want to change myself and my contributions to enwiki. If SimpleWiki is the best fit for me, then why not enwiki, where I have been contributing for 10 years?
    Keeping your hesitation and concern in my mind, I will effectively contribute in the future, and I need that chance. If you suspect or feel anything like if I am being involved in COI or anything again, then you always have the tools in your power to block me without any hesitation. Thank you.
    To Liz, I accept your suggestions and will follow those. I will focus on anti-vandalism. I was a rollbacker before, and I do have ideas regarding that. Thank you.
    For English proficiency, I can present my English test certificates. I won’t say that I’m the best in English, but my CEFR score is B2 level for now, including reading, writing, & listening. I do have good communication skills in speaking, which is not useful while editing.
    The previous issue with my English was there because that day I was kind of under the influence of beer, and I was sad that I got blocked. And I wrote “gibberish” whatever I could without checking again.
    If the community feels keeping me away from Wikipedia is the best solution. So be it, I will accept the consequences and decision of the community. DIVINE 09:32, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Spicy Thank you for your comment on AN regarding my unblock request. When my permission was revoked due to my request regarding the 4th level warning. I requested to remove other permissions like rollback and PCR after that, as I am never a fan of PERMS; I keep them when I feel like I need them. In simplewiki, I slap with speedy deletion because I follow Wikipedia rules to slap because they create pages that are supposed to get deleted by me or any other reviewer that won’t change the fact. Additionally, I have created 70 pages. Helped more than 100 pages to add references on them and have fixed them. Have filed multiple SPIs with 100% accuracy if I believe and have fought against in anti-vandalism. Anyway, I don’t want to waste my time and yours writing this long essay.
    Let’s me break this down:
    1. The day I was blocked, my identity, my university, and even my professor's name were doxxed publicly in AN, and nobody cares, but I was blamed for doxxing another user's identity. And editors were praising another editor, calling them Sherlock.
    2. I am human, not a saint; i feel bad and i do have feelings too. Yes, I reacted every time. That’s why I am here requesting to get unblocked after 8 months, and I was punished with an indefinite block.
    3. What you need to accept is that I have made effective contributions, but what I will accept is that I had some attitude problems, but I never meant to do personal attacks against someone.
    4. I have already mentioned that if you want to block me forever, there is no problem; I will accept that, and don’t think I came here to get unblocked after slapping multiple CSDs on SimpleWiki. I was editing there before getting blocked on EnWiki, but I came to seek one more chance.
    5. Wikipedia is an open community for all, and yes, of course there will be debates and arguments, but when I come to seek help in AN for getting a 4th level warning, it comes from nowhere towards me like an arrow that turned out into personal attacks.
    6. I have already submitted multiple unblock requests previously mentioning all of those things before; that’s why I didn’t add much into this fresh request, as I wanted to forget all of those and move forward with positive thoughts and positive attitudes.
    7. I feel like I was tricked; I got blocked by Ivanvector, but it wasn’t per community vote, but when I requested to get unblocked, it was passed to the community, and I got six months to appeal the block, and when I am requesting now, I am facing more brutal charges than before.
    Anyway Thankyou for your kind comment but we never encountered previously. DIVINE 21:56, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks Giraffe, btw, I didn't demand I produce facts while everyone here was so concerned or confused with my csd tags.
    I presented useful contributions and facts about simplewiki, and yes, I am being WP:BOLD. If you think I will beg for it, nah, never not a cup of my tea.
    What I knew was this was coming; my unblock request was ignored for 1 month and 18 days, while the Tulsi request was procedurally decided within two weeks.
    I also mentioned about getting tricked which is fact, so do you have any explanation about that?
    Can you go behind and check the previous AN where my identity was doxed?
    Does anyone of you have the ability or will to talk in that? No, you will never, because at first you blocked me for legal threats.
    Second, language fluency.
    Third, person behavior.
    Now you are being “mortuary archaeologists.”.
    I love Wikipedia and its not owned by you or anyone as it is owned by editors like you and me.
    I will be admin within 5 years. Note it down; I am leaving it here.
    I withdraw my unblock request here.
    I would like to thank @Ivanvector. I was worried if he would go with decline as he was blocking administrator, but I always admired him, and @Liz was always supportive, whatever my past or present was, as she always requested me not to add too much CSD tags on WP:ADV drafts, but I ignored her and moved on by slapping and cleaning.
    I will request to revoke all of my simplewiki rights today too.
    I know how well your CU works. Telling that I have never used multiple accounts though.
    Love you all, no hate. Peace, I don't want you to disturb me.
    For COI declaration, Bongkosh Rittichainuwat, KP Khanal, Prakash Bahadur Deuba, Tulsi Bhagat, Sangeeta Swechcha, and myself [132].
    I am happy of who i am. Make Wikipedia better now it’s in your hands which never can.
    I love you all. Take care and peace.
    For UPE Pudgy Penguins, the founder of Pudgy and one listed on my profile. Happy Now?
    Take care. I would like to request you to ban me here permanently. ❤️ DIVINE 17:30, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-42

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 21:18, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-43

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:49, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-44

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:53, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-45

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:47, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-46

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:04, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]