User talk:Arkelna

Nonsense of Unsigh

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Unsigh, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Unsigh provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Unsigh, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 02:32, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Unsigh, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

non-notable neologism

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Improbcat 15:52, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do not removed deletion tags from articles you have created, as you did with Unsigh. This is considered vandalism and may result in your being blocked from editing wikipedia. If you wish to dispute the tag, the means to do so are noted in the tag. Improbcat 16:35, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note

Stop it or you're blocked. DS 20:59, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Arkelna for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Blanchardb 21:04, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]