User talk:AnuragBisht108

Welcome!

Hi AnuragBisht108! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Kj cheetham (talk) 11:55, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sahitya AajTak (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Storchy were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sahitya AajTak and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Storchy (talk) 20:14, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AnuragBisht108! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Storchy (talk) 20:14, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sahitya AajTak

Hello, AnuragBisht108. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sahitya AajTak, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:10, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sahitya AajTak

Hello, AnuragBisht108. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sahitya AajTak".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:21, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Aaj Tak. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ratnahastin (talk) 04:34, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you're doing well. I wanted to bring up a small concern regarding the introduction. The way it's currently phrased makes it seem like the channel is directly associated with the BJP, which could be misleading to readers at first glance.

I think it's fine to add any relevant details about the BJP later in the article, but in the introduction, it's important to keep it neutral to avoid any confusion. Could you please revise that section accordingly?

Thanks for your understanding and cooperation! AnuragBisht108 (talk) 04:54, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Aaj Tak shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ratnahastin (talk) 17:11, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was editing cause i have not found anything related that AajTak is working for the BJP, yes it has been pinlaised several times in the past but none of the citation is directly saying that AajTak is working for the BJP. Therefore want to remove this from the intro line as it is all mention the reception area below.

Kinldy revert AnuragBisht108 (talk) 17:56, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Give me reply, i don't think you all editing in the right way. I think you all are doing this in influence of something, i just want a new write up where BJP should not be use, because none of the citation have that proof. On behalf of which you are doing all this AnuragBisht108 (talk) 04:36, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Editors do not have permission to do any article-content editing or discussion while they are blocked. Likewise, other editors typically ignore them. DMacks (talk) 15:32, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Ratnahastin (talk) 04:34, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked User:AnuBisht21. Any future violation of our account policies, such as by use of multiple accounts, will lead to an immediate and indefinite block of this account here as well. DMacks (talk) 04:58, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, AnuragBisht108. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Aaj Tak, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. You have created Sahitya AajTak in past, if you are associated with the channel, you might want to disclose that. Ratnahastin (talk) 05:10, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I created because while surfing through the google i found out that the that is a very good event but unfortunately we don't have that page with us on Wikipedia so i just did my part my adding information for the Wikipedia, plus for the AajTak channel i am not saying you should remove that i just wanted you to add that BJP favouring line in the later section as someone has already added in the reception part with the ciatation. AnuragBisht108 (talk) 05:21, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also using COI template, thanks for telling AnuragBisht108 (talk) 06:13, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Ahri Boy (talk) 06:33, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Can you tell me why you are adding that without any citation as you don't have any proof for that. Add with citation i will not remove the edit. AnuragBisht108 (talk) 06:35, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:12, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Borgenland (talk) 02:11, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]